Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:43:04.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dual-band all textile antenna with AMC for heartbeat monitor and pacemaker control applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2021

Farah R. Kareem*
Affiliation:
Communication and Electronics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia, Elminia, 61512, Egypt Electrical Communication and Electronic Systems Engineering Department, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, Giza 12563, Egypt
Mohamed El Atrash
Affiliation:
Electrical Communication and Electronic Systems Engineering Department, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, Giza 12563, Egypt
Ahmed A. Ibrahim
Affiliation:
Communication and Electronics Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia, Elminia, 61512, Egypt
Mahmoud A. Abdalla
Affiliation:
Electronic Engineering Department, Military Technical College, Cairo 11787, Egypt
*
Author for correspondence: Farah R. Kareem, E-mail: fkareem@msa.edu.eg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

All textile integrated dual-band monopole antenna with an artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) is proposed. The proposed design operates at 2.4 and 5.8 GHz for wearable medical applications to monitor the heartbeat. A flexible and low-profile E- shaped CPW dual-band textile antenna is integrated with a 4 × 4 dual-band textile AMC reflector to enhance the gain and specific absorption rate (SAR). The SAR is reduced by nearly 95% at both 1 and 10 g. The design was measured on the body with a 2 mm separation. The simulated and measured results appear in high agreement in the case of with and without AMC array integration. The measurement was performed in the indoor environment and in an anechoic chamber to validate the design based on reflection coefficient and radiation pattern measurements.

Information

Type
Biomedical Applications
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Layout of the suggested system.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Configuration of the E-shaped antenna, Ls = 37, Ws = 30 mm, Lg = 7.36 mm, Wg = 13.1 mm, Lf = 14 mm, Wf = 3.4 mm, L1 = 20.5 mm, W1 = 10.8 mm, L2 = 3.3 mm, W2 = 4.1 mm, S = 1 mm, g = 0.2 mm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Configuration of the E-shaped antenna: (a) top view of integrated design, and (b) side view of the integrated design; where L = 98.65 mm, W = 98.65 mm, h = 1.5 mm, d = 3 mm, H = 3 mm, Ws = 30, Ls = 37, Mo = 25 mm.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Prototype fabrication of the (a) E-shaped antenna, (b) E-shaped antenna integrated with a 4 × 4 AMC array.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Reflection coefficient result of E-shaped antenna in free space, with a measured result on the VNA display screen.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Simulated 3D gain radiation pattern of the free space E-shape antenna (a) 2.4 GHz, and (b) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Current surface distribution of the free space E-shape antenna at (a) 2.4 GHz, and (b) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Setup for measuring the radiation pattern of the E antenna.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Simulated/measured normalized gain pattern of E-shaped antenna in free space at 2.4 GHz for (a) at φ = 0°, (b) at φ = 90°, (c) co-cross-polarization at φ = 0°, (c) co-cross-polarization at φ = 90.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Simulated/measured normalized gain radiation pattern of E-shaped antenna in free space at 5.8 GHz for (a) at φ = 0°, (b) at φ = 90°, (c) co-cross polarization at φ = 0°, (c) co-cross polarization at φ = 90°.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Numerical human model (HUGO) in CST (a) E-shaped antenna, (b) E-shaped antenna integrated AMC.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Simulated/measured reflection coefficient result of E-shaped antenna without AMC on chest, with a measured result on the VNA display screen.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Simulated 3D gain radiation pattern of the E-shaped antenna on the phantom body at (a) 2.4 GHz, and (b) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 13

Fig. 14. (a) AMC unit cell layout with, X4 = 17.16.mm, X3 = 24.16 mm, M = 0.92 mm, (b) equivalent circuit model of AMC unit cell with, L1 = 1.12 nH, L2 = 1.67 nH, L3 = 0.737 nH, C1 = 0.56 pF, C2 = 1.47 pF.

Figure 14

Fig. 15. Circuit/electromagnetic full-wave simulation of AMC.

Figure 15

Fig. 16. Simulated current surface distribution of AMC unit at (a) 2.4 GHz, (b) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 16

Fig. 17. Dual-band AMC reflection phases for different values of (a) X3, (b) X4, (c) M, and (d) reflection phase of the proposed dimension.

Figure 17

Table 1. Values of SAR with and without integrated AMC.

Figure 18

Table 2. Values of gain and total efficiency of an antenna with and without integrated AMC.

Figure 19

Fig. 18. Simulated/measured reflection coefficient result of E-shaped antenna integrated with AMC in free space, with the measured result on VNA display screen.

Figure 20

Fig. 19. Simulated 3D gain radiation pattern of the E monopole antenna integrated with AMC on free space (a) 2.4 GHz, and (b) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 21

Fig. 20. Simulated/measured reflection coefficient result of integrated E-shaped antenna with AMC on the human body, with a measured result on VNA display screen.

Figure 22

Fig. 21. Simulated 3D gain radiation pattern the phantom with 4 × 4 AMC at (a) 2.4 GHz, and (b) 5.8 GHz.

Figure 23

Fig. 22. Simulated SAR of the E-shaped antenna at, (a) 2.4 GHz 1 g, (b) 5.8 GHz 1 g, (c) 2.4 GHz 10 g, (d) 5.8 GHz 10 g.

Figure 24

Fig. 23. Simulated SAR of the proposed integrated E-shaped antenna at, (a) 2.4 GHz 1 g, (b) 5.8 GHz 1 g, (c) 2.4 GHz 10 g, (d) 5.8 GHz 10 g.

Figure 25

Table 3. Comparison between different biomedical wearable antenna design.