Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:09:00.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of Chernobyl Fall-Out as a New Reference Level in Northern Hemisphere Glaciers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

M. Pourchet
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Gėophysique de l’Environnement du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 38402 Saint-Martin-d’Hères Cedex, France
J. F. Pinglot
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Gėophysique de l’Environnement du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 38402 Saint-Martin-d’Hères Cedex, France
L. Reynaud
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Gėophysique de l’Environnement du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 38402 Saint-Martin-d’Hères Cedex, France
G. Holdsworth
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Gėophysique de l’Environnement du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 38402 Saint-Martin-d’Hères Cedex, FranceNational Hydrology Research Institute, 11 Innovation Boulevard, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 3H5, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Among the various artificial radioactive markers (mainly from atmospheric nuclear tests), the contamination from the Chernobyl accident has been found at five sampling sites on Northern Hemisphere glaciers. Total beta-activity measurements reveal a very high radio-active level. However, due to the short time of its occurrence, the temporal resolution of this event in the snow layers can be generally quite low and positive results require careful sampling. The size of the signal also depends on the trajectory of the contaminant cloud, the amount of precipitation, and the surface conditions during deposition.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1988
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Map of snow-sampling sites on Northern Hemisphere glaciers.

Figure 1

Table I.Beta activity of snow samples with their locations and dates of collection

Figure 2

Fig. 2.Comparison of beta activity from several glaciers of the Northern Hemisphere.

Figure 3

Fig. 3.Beta activity versus depth for Col du Dôme (Mont Blanc area. 4250 m; 2 December 1986 drilling; January 1987 measurements). (1) Small grain firn; (2) Rough firn; (3) Ice layer; (4) Ice lens.

Figure 4

Fig. 4.Daily precipitation during April-May 1986 at Les Contamines-Montjoie meteorological station (Haute-Savoie, 1180 m).

Figure 5

Fig. 5.Beta activity versus depth for an ice core from Mont de Lans glacier (Ecrins area. 3300 m; 25 May 1986 drilling).