Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T07:49:50.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inorganic geochemistry of the type Caradoc series (Sandbian to middle Katian, Upper Ordovician), Onny valley, Shropshire, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2013

R. HANNIGAN
Affiliation:
Environmental Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Massachusetts at Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA
M. E. BROOKFIELD*
Affiliation:
Environmental Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Massachusetts at Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: mbrookfi@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The geochemistry and petrology of the type section of the Caradoc Series in the Onny valley indicate that it was deposited on a marginal basin continental shelf similar to the western side of the present Sea of Japan. The lower beds form a transgressive–regressive sequence in which the rocks become less mature upwards. All the coarser sediments above the basal quartzites and conglomerates are greywackes in which the apparent muddy and ferrous matrix is due to the breakdown of unstable minerals and particles. Higher values of Na2O and Na/K ratios are found in the coarser shallow-water sandstones of the Horderley Sandstone Formation and decrease markedly in the succeeding beds, accompanied by an increase in K2O. Higher values of carbonate-corrected (and hence related) other major and minor elements like SiO2, CaO, P2O5, MnO and most trace elements correlate with the transgressive systems and maximum flooding surfaces of the three sequences recognized where they are related to condensation at those horizons. Chemical Indices of Alteration (CIA) suggest that the Horderley Sandstone Formation underwent greater predepositional physical weathering than lower and higher beds, which is compatible with the petrography, and were deposited during a cool phase within overall warm Sandbian–Katian times. Trace element ratios suggest an oxic to suboxic depositional environment.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Caer Caradoc, type area of Murchison's Caradoc Sandstone. (b) Palaeogeography of the Caradocian with positions of North Wales in Avalonia marked (map courtesy Ron Blakey). (c) Location map of exposures. BF – Bala fault; PF – Prees fault; PLF – Pontesford-Linley fault; CSF – Church Stretton fault (modified from Bettley, Fortey & Siveter, 2001 and Kokelaar, 1988).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Onny valley geological map and section (with sample locations) and local stratigraphy (based on Dean, 1958 and Savage & Bassett, 1985). International stages from Webby et al. (2004) and Chen et al. (2006). A recent analysis puts the Silurian/Hirnantian boundary at 443.41 Ma and the basal Hirnantian at 444.68 Ma (Sadler, Cooper & Melchin, 2009), a precision warranted neither by stratigraphic nor radiometric dating methods. These, however, are not much different from the international one used here.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Exposures in Onny valley: (a) Road-cuts in the Cheney Longville Formation; (b) Onny stream section in the Acton Scott Formation.

Figure 3

Figure 4. QFL provenance diagram (from Dickinson, 1985) and plutonic (humid) and metamorphic (humid) field of Suttner, Basu & Mack (1981) with Onny samples plotted.

Figure 4

Table 1. Major element oxide analyses, carbonate content and Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) for Onny samples

Figure 5

Table 2. Major element/aluminium and other ratios

Figure 6

Table 3. Minor element analyses with acceptable RSD mostly less than 5

Figure 7

Table 4. Select minor element ratios, to Al and each other

Figure 8

Figure 5. Major element oxide and CaCO3 distribution in section. Open circles are carbonate-corrected values.

Figure 9

Figure 6. Select major element ratio distribution and CIA values.

Figure 10

Figure 7. Rare earth element distributions.

Figure 11

Figure 8. Stratigraphic distribution of Ce/Ce* and Eu/Eu* ratios.

Figure 12

Figure 9. Selected trace element ratios.

Figure 13

Figure 10. Fe2O3/Mo plot.

Figure 14

Figure 11. Re/Mo plot (basic diagram from Turgeon & Bromsack, 2006, fig. 6)

Figure 15

Figure 12. Onny samples plotted on Th–Sc–Zr diagram showing tectonic fields (from Bhatia, 1983).

Figure 16

Figure 13. Th–Co–Zr diagram as 12 (from Bhatia, 1983)

Figure 17

Figure 14. La/Y versus Sc/Cr plot showing tectonic fields and Onny samples plotted (from Bhatia, 1983).

Supplementary material: File

Hannigan Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Hannigan Supplementary Material(File)
File 27.1 KB