Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:52:46.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shifts in microphytoplankton species and cell size at Admiralty Bay, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2014

Priscila Kienteca Lange*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Laboratório de Fitoplâncton e Microorganismos Marinhos, Avenue Italia, Km 8, Rio Grand 96201-900, Brazil Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Avenue Carlos Chagas, 373, Prédio CCS, Bl. A, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21949-902, Brazil
Denise Rivera Tenenbaum
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Avenue Carlos Chagas, 373, Prédio CCS, Bl. A, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21949-902, Brazil
Virgínia Maria Tavano
Affiliation:
Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Laboratório de Fitoplâncton e Microorganismos Marinhos, Avenue Italia, Km 8, Rio Grand 96201-900, Brazil
Rodolfo Paranhos
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Avenue Carlos Chagas, 373, Prédio CCS, Bl. A, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21949-902, Brazil
Lucia De Siqueira Campos
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Avenue Carlos Chagas, 373, Prédio CCS, Bl. A, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21949-902, Brazil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phytoplankton (>15 µm) was investigated in three shallow coastal areas at Admiralty Bay (AB) between the summers of 2002–03 and 2008–09. Phytoplankton abundance was low (103 cells l-1) and, over time, the prevailing cell size decreased due to a shift in phytoplankton dominant species from diatoms to dinoflagellates. In situ and remote sensing data showed that oscillations in sea surface temperature, precipitation, ice formation/melting, irradiance (cloud cover) and bottom circulation (indexed by the Antarctic Oscillation Index; AAO) were shown to govern the structure of the phytoplankton. Under negative AAO, diatoms prevailed, with the dominance of large (>80 µm) benthic diatoms (e.g. Corethron pennatum and Navicula directa) in periods of low production (102 cells l-1 in 2002–03), and medium-sized (31–80 µm) centrics (e.g. Thalassiosira spp. and Stellarima microtrias) when the abundance was higher (104 cells l-1 in 2003–04). Conversely, positive AAO led to the co-dominance of dinoflagellates and planktonic diatoms (e.g. Pseudo-nitzschia spp.) in the summers of 2007–08 and 2008–09. These results suggest that the AAO can be a good predictor of phytoplankton in coastal areas around the western Antarctic Peninsula, and may help our understanding of changes in other trophic levels of the food web.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 a. The three sampling sites at Admiralty Bay: Comandante Ferraz (CF; near Comandante Ferraz Station, Brazil), Botany Point (BP) and Ezcurra (EZ; near Arctowski Station, Poland). b. Local depths (A 20 m, B 30 m, C 60 m) and approximate sampling depths at each sampling site.

Figure 1

Table I Sampling seasons, sites sampled (BP=Botany Point, CF=Comandante Ferraz, EZ=Ezcurra), station bathymetry at each site and sampled depths at each station in Admiralty Bay.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Climatology from 2002–09 (dashed line) and monthly values. a. Sea surface temperature (SST) and b. chlorophyll estimated from Aqua-MODIS remote sensors (INPE), c. irradiance anomaly and d. precipitation measured in situ, and e. Antarctic Oscillation Index (AAO). Arrows indicate the sampling periods.

Figure 3

Table II Number of samples or measurements (n), mean and standard deviation (SD) of each variable in coastal waters of Admiralty Bay.

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Relationships between a. temperature and salinity, b. salinity and ammonium (NH4+), c. phosphate (PO43-) and nitrate (NO3-) in coastal waters of Admiralty Bay during the periods when data of both variables were available. ES=early summer, MS=mid-summer, LS=late summer.

Figure 5

Table III Correlation (Spearman r) between environmental and biological variables in Admiralty Bay, Antarctic Peninsula (only significant r values (P<0.05) are displayed.

Figure 6

Fig. 4 Phytoplankton (>15 µm) mean abundance (and standard deviation) showing a. the contribution of taxonomic groups and b. contribution (%) of cell size classes in coastal waters of Admiralty Bay during early (ES), mid-summer (MS) or late summer (LS) of 2002–03, 2003–04, 2007–08 and 2008–09.

Figure 7

Fig. 5 Cluster analysis of the abundance of each species in water samples from the shallow coastal waters of Admiralty Bay (Ward’s Method, Euclidean Distance).

Figure 8

Table IV Species that most contributed to the similarity of samples within groups identified by the cluster analysis.

Figure 9

Fig. 6 Canonical correspondence analyses of the abundance of phytoplankton species by environmental variables in the shallow coastal waters of Admiralty Bay.

Figure 10

Fig. 7 Abundance (cells l-1) of phytoplankton size classes and taxonomic groups in the four sampling seasons: 2002–03, 2003–04, 2007–08, 2008–09.