Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:47:07.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stabilization of ion beam generation in a diode with self-magnetic insulation in double-pulse mode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

A.I. Pushkarev*
Affiliation:
Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia
Y.I. Isakova
Affiliation:
Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia
I.P. Khaylov
Affiliation:
Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: A.I. Pushkarev, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 2a Lenin Ave., Tomsk634028, Russia. E-mail: aipush@mail.ru

Abstract

The paper presents the results of statistical studies of ion beam generation in different geometry diodes with explosive emission cathode in a mode of self-magnetic insulation. The experiments were carried out using the TEMP-4M pulsed ion beam accelerator during its operation in both unipolar pulse mode (100 ns, 250–300 kV) and bipolar-pulse mode with the first negative (300–600 ns, 100–150 kV) followed by a second positive (120 ns, 250–300 kV) pulse. It is found that the standard deviation of the total energy and energy density of the beam does not exceed 10–11%, while the same shot-to-shot variation in ion current density was found to be 20–30%. The mechanism of the energy density stabilization from pulse to pulse may be associated with the charge exchange between accelerated ions and stationary molecules and formation of accelerated neutrals. We observed a high correlation between the energy density (or total beam energy) and the duration of the first voltage pulse. We performed analysis of Blumlein statistical performance when the Blumlein was terminated with a resistive load and with a self-magnetically insulated ion diode. A characteristic feature of Blumlein operation in the double-pulse mode is an excellent reproducibility of breakdown of the preliminary spark gap, the variation in breakdown voltage is <2%. At the same time, the shot-to-shot variation in the breakdown voltage of the main spark gap in both bipolar- and unipolar pulse mode is 3–4 times higher than that for the preliminary spark gap. To improve the statistical performance of the main spark gap we used the first voltage pulse at the output of Blumlein to trigger the main spark gap. The new trigatron-type regime of the main spark gap operation showed a better reproducibility of the first pulse duration, with the time jitter not exceeding 10 ns in a set of 50 pulses.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The waveforms of voltage and current at the output of Blumlein and charging voltage of Blumlein.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The shot-to-shot variation in the ion current density (a) and maximum energy density (b).

Figure 2

Table 1. Statistical analysis of the electrical parameters for the TEMP-4M accelerator

Figure 3

Table 2. Statistical analysis of the total energy and energy density

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Dependence of the total charge, transferred in the diode on the duration of the first pulse. Summary data for the strip focusing and planar diodes at different gap spacings.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Shot-to-shot variation in the breakdown voltage of the main spark gap and the preliminary gap operating in unipolar-pulse (a) and bipolar pulse (b) mode.

Figure 6

Table 3. Statistical analysis of the electrical parameters for Blumlein when operating with a matched resistive load

Figure 7

Fig. 5. The schematic of the trigger pulse formation for external triggering of the main spark: R1 and R2 – resistance of a voltage divider and a resistance limiting the current though the discharge gap, respectively; 1 – transformer; 2 – a cable used for the formation of a delay time between formation of a trigger pulse and arrival of this pulse to the trigger electrode of the trigatron spark gap.

Figure 8

Table 4. Statistical analysis of the electrical parameters for Blumlein when operating in externally triggered mode of the main spark gap

Figure 9

Fig. 6. Waveforms of triggering pulse after inversion and switching current of the main gap.

Figure 10

Fig. 7. Shot-to-shot variation in the total diode current. Data for a flat strip diode, six sets with 50 pulses in each set.

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Distribution of the energy density formed by a focusing diode (a) and planar (b) diodes. Data presented for five consecutive pulses.