Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T09:36:35.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A continental perspective on the timing of environmental change during the last glacial stage in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2021

Haidee Cadd*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences and Sprigg Geobiology Centre, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia Earth and Sustainability Research Centre (ESSRC), School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Lynda Petherick
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Jonathan Tyler
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences and Sprigg Geobiology Centre, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
Annika Herbert
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Tim J Cohen
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Kale Sniderman
Affiliation:
ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Timothy T. Barrows
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Reka H. Fulop
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia Australia's Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, New Illawarra Rd, Lucas Heights NSW 2234, Australia
Jasper Knight
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
A. Peter Kershaw
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, VIC, Australia
Eric A. Colhoun
Affiliation:
School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Mathew R.P. Harris
Affiliation:
Earth and Sustainability Research Centre (ESSRC), School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author at: School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2033, NSW, Australia E-mail addresss: h.cadd@unsw.edu.au (H. Cadd)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The timing and duration of the coldest period in the last glacial stage, often referred to as the last glacial maximum (LGM), has been observed to vary spatially and temporally. In Australia, this period is characterised by colder, and in some places more arid, climates than today. We applied Monte-Carlo change point analysis to all available continuous proxy records covering this period, primarily pollen records, from across Australia (n = 37) to assess this change. We find a significant change point occurred (within uncertainty) at 28.6 ± 2.8 ka in 25 records. We interpret this change as a shift to cooler climates, associated with a widespread decline in biological productivity. An additional change point occurred at 17.7 ± 2.2 ka in 24 records. We interpret this change as a shift towards warmer climates, associated with increased biological productivity. We broadly characterise the period between 28.6 (± 2.8) – 17.7 (± 2.2) ka as an extended period of maximum cooling, with low productivity vegetation that may have occurred as a combined response to reduced temperatures, lower moisture availability and atmospheric CO2. These results have implications for how the spatial and temporal coherence of climate change, in this case during the LGM, can be best interrogated and interpreted.

Information

Type
Thematic Set: Southern Hemisphere Last Glacial Maximum (SHeMax)
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2021
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of Australia with sites indicated. Symbols show proxy type and colours indicate site locations. Colours change along a latitudinal gradient. Solid black line indicates the current extent of the Australian land mass and light grey line indicates the -130 m contour and the likely extent of exposed continental shelf during the global last glacial maximum. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 1

Figure 2. Schematic of the analytical process used in this synthesis. Step 1: Records were identified and collated (see Table 1 and Figure 1). Step 2: An updated Bayesian age model was determined for each record using Bacon (Blaauw and Christen, 2011) and the SH20 calibration curve for radiocarbon dates. 2000 age iterations were extracted from each age model. New age models were compared to original age-model, plotted as an orange line on age-model plot. Step 3: A Principal Curve was applied to compositional data (e.g., pollen spectra) to reduce the data to a single curve. Data for each record [pollen Principal Curves, δ13C, δ18O, and Branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetra-ethers (GDGTs)] was then plotted using the weighted mean age from the updated age model (black line). Individual proxy samples are indicated by black squares. Proxy data were plotted using the 2000 age iterations extracted in step 2 (blue shading; 95% and 68% CI). Change point analysis was conducted on each record to determine the timing of changes in the mean of proxy data. Step 4: Identified change points were extracted and each plotted as a Probability Distribution Function. The probability of change (height of peak) results from the likelihood of a change occurring at that time. The uncertainty associated with the timing of change (width of distribution) results from the spread of age iterations determined in step 2. This process was repeated for each identified site. Sites that met the broad criteria were incorporated into further analysis. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 2

Table 1. Locations of continuous palaeoclimate and palaeoenvironmental records identified from across Australia covering the last glacial stage (35–15 ka) and included in this synthesis.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Examples of the different change points identified in the 38 records analysed. (1) Record exhibiting a single change point. (2) Record exhibiting two change points. (3) Record exhibiting three change points. (4) Record exhibiting four change points between 35–15 ka. Change points denoted by vertical lines (orange represents weighted mean of 2000 age-depth model iterations; red represents median of 2000 age-depth model iterations). Light blue shade represents 95% of age-depth vs. proxy relationships, darker blue shading represents 68% of age-depth vs. proxy relationships. Y axis is orientated so that up indicates an increase in biological activity, temperature, or rainfall and down represents a decrease in biological activity, temperature, or rainfall as indicated by coloured arrows. Black line and squares represent proxy data plotted on weighted mean of 2000 age-depth model iterations. See Figure 1 for locations. See Supplementary Materials for change points identified from all records. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 4

Figure 4. Frequency distribution of the weighted mean of all significant change points identified in all 38 analysed records. Shading denotes the simplified climate indices assigned to each significant change point as either a decrease in biological activity, temperature, or rainfall (orange) or an increase in biological activity, temperature, or rainfall (blue). Coloured lines indicate change points identified as the initial onset of decreasing climate conditions (i.e., shift to cooler climates in association with decreased moisture and/or atmospheric CO2) (dark orange line), further decrease in climate conditions (light orange line), a middle change to increasing climate conditions (i.e., shift to warmer climates in association with increased moisture and/or atmospheric CO2) (light blue line) and a final increase or termination of extreme conditions (dark blue line). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 5

Figure 5. Compilation of identified change points for each site. Weighted mean timing of change points is indicated by coloured symbols. Age uncertainty (95% confidence interval), determined from the ensemble of 2000 age-depth models, associated with each change point is indicated by error bars. Sites are plotted along a latitudinal gradient. (A) All change points identified for each site. (B) Only change points identified and determined as representing the onset of extreme conditions and change decreasing climate indicators (including temperature, precipitation, and CO2) (mean = dashed orange line, SD = shaded orange bar) and the termination of extreme conditions representing increasing climate indicators (including temperature, precipitation, and CO2) (mean = dashed blue line, SD = shaded blue bar). Density of dates curves above panels A and B are kernel density plots of A. Kernel density estimate of both mean and uncertainty of timing of all identified change points derived from the ensemble of 2000 age-depth models and B Kernel density estimate of both mean and uncertainty of timing of change points identified as the onset of extreme conditions (orange line), termination of extreme conditions (blue line) derived from the ensemble of 2000 age-depth models. Change points not assigned to either the onset of termination of extreme conditions are shown by dashed lines. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 6

Figure 6. Probability density functions for all sites (coloured lines) and summed probability of (a) all change points, (b) all change points identified as representing a change to decreasing climate indicators (including temperature, precipitation, and CO2), and (c) all change points identified as representing a change to increasing climate indicators (including temperature, precipitation, and CO2). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 7

Figure 7. (A) Summed probability density function of all change points identified as representing a change to decreasing climate indicators (including temperature, precipitation, and CO2) (orange line) and all change points identified representing a change to increasing climate indicators (including temperature, precipitation, and CO2). (B) Compilation of ice core atmospheric CO2 measurements (ppm) for the period 35–15 ka (Köhler et al., 2017). (C) Ice volume equivalent sea level (m) (black line) and 95% probability limiting values (grey shading) (Lambeck et al., 2014). Vertical shaded lines indicate the mean and standard deviation of change points identified as representing the onset of extreme conditions (orange) and termination of extreme conditions (blue). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 8

Figure 8. Change points identified and determined as representing an initial change to decreasing climate indicators (including temperature, precipitation, and CO2), a further decrease in climate indicators, a middle shift to increasing climate indicators and a final increase in climate indicators (including temperature, precipitation, and CO2). Size of circle represents the age uncertainty (95% confidence interval), determined from the ensemble of 2000 age-depth models, associated with each change point. Individual records are ordered by latitude from north (13°S) to south (42°S). Non-pollen records are indicated in red text.

Supplementary material: File

Cadd et al. supplementary material

Cadd et al. supplementary material

Download Cadd et al. supplementary material(File)
File 5.1 MB