Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T09:33:24.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Large-deformation electrohydrodynamics of an elastic capsule in a DC electric field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2018

Sudip Das
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India
Rochish M. Thaokar*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: rochish@che.iitb.ac.in

Abstract

The dynamics of a spherical elastic capsule, containing a Newtonian fluid bounded by an elastic membrane and immersed in another Newtonian fluid, in a uniform DC electric field is investigated. Discontinuity of electrical properties, such as the conductivities of the internal and external fluid media as well as the capacitance and conductance of the membrane, leads to a net interfacial Maxwell stress which can cause the deformation of such an elastic capsule. We investigate this problem considering well-established membrane laws for a thin elastic membrane, with fully resolved hydrodynamics in the Stokes flow limit, and describe the electrostatics using the capacitor model. In the limit of small deformation, the analytical theory predicts the dynamics fairly satisfactorily. Large deformations at high capillary number, though, necessitate a numerical approach (axisymmetric boundary element method in the present case) to solve this highly nonlinear problem. Akin to vesicles, at intermediate times, highly nonlinear biconcave shapes along with squaring and hexagon-like shapes are observed when the outer medium is more conducting. The study identifies the essentiality of parameters such as high membrane capacitance, low membrane conductance, low hydrodynamic time scales and high capillary number (the ratio of the destabilizing electric force to the stabilizing elastic force) for observation of these shape transitions. The transition is due to large compressive Maxwell stress at the poles at intermediate times. Thus such shape transition can be seen in spherical globules admitting electrical capacitance, possibly irrespective of the nature of the interfacial restoring force.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1.Schematic representation of a capsule in a uniform electric field.

Figure 1

Figure 2.Comparison of degree of deformation as a function of $Ca$ obtained from analytical theory (——), the boundary integral simulation considering the SEM with Skalak law (— ⋅ —) and the neo-Hookean law (– – –) considering ${\hat{C}}_{m}=50$, ${\hat{G}}_{m}=0$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{r}=1$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=1$.

Figure 2

Table 1.Associated time scales at different conductivity ratios.

Figure 3

Figure 3.Dynamics for the deformation of a capsule with Skalak membrane at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$ (– – –), 1 (⋯⋯) and 0.1 (— ⋅ —), and for the deformation of a capsule with neo-Hookean membrane at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$ (– – ⋅ – –), 1 (——) and 0.1 (— ⋅ ⋅ —) at $Ca=0.25$.

Figure 4

Figure 4.Shape evolution of a capsule with Skalak membrane at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$ for $Ca=0.25$.

Figure 5

Figure 5.(a) Time required for oblate to prolate shape transition as a function of capillary number at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$. (b) Time required to attain intermediate maximum deformation at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$ (– – –) and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$ (——).

Figure 6

Figure 6.Shape evolution of a capsule with Skalak membrane at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$ for $Ca=0.25$.

Figure 7

Figure 7.Shape evolution of a capsule with Skalak membrane at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$ for $Ca=0.45$.

Figure 8

Figure 8.Streamline plot (curves with arrow, shown only at right side of axis of symmetry), velocity profile (short arrows, magnitude represents relative extent of flow, shown only at left side of axis of symmetry) and electric stress (arrows from the interface) for $Ca=0.45$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$ at different times. Inset shows the variation of meridional $T_{s}$ (— ⋅ —), azimuthal $T_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}}$ (– – –) and mean $T_{m}$ (——) membrane tensions along the arclength.

Figure 9

Figure 9.Streamline plot (curves with arrow, shown only at right side of axis of symmetry), velocity profile (short arrows, magnitude represents relative extent of flow, shown only at left side of axis of symmetry) and electric stress (arrows from the interface) for $Ca=0.25$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$ at different times. Inset shows the variation of meridional $T_{s}$ (— ⋅ —), azimuthal $T_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}}$ (– – –) and mean $T_{m}$ (——) membrane tensions along the arclength.

Figure 10

Figure 10.Variation of transmembrane potential on the interface ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}=0$ at north pole and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}=\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}$ at south pole) for the shapes at $t=0$ (⋯⋯), $t=50$ (– – –), $t=120$ (— ⋅ —), $t=230$ (— ⋅ ⋅ —) and $t=\infty$ (——) obtained during the deformation of a capsule at $Ca=0.45$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$.

Figure 11

Figure 11.Variation of normal electric stress (– – ⋅ – –), normal elastic stress (— ⋅ —), normal hydrodynamic stress (– – –), stress due to bending rigidity (——), tangential electric stress (⋯⋯), tangential elastic stress (— ⋅ ⋅ —) and tangential hydrodynamic stress (— —) at the interface ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}=0$ at north pole and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}=\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}$ at south pole) for the (a,d) biconcave shape at $t=75$, (b,e) square shape at $t=120$ and (c,f) steady prolate shape at $t=\infty$ in the deformation of a capsule at $Ca=0.45$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$.

Figure 12

Figure 12.Shape evolution of a capsule with Skalak membrane at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$ for $Ca=2$.

Figure 13

Figure 13.Streamline plot (curves with arrow, shown only at right side of axis of symmetry), velocity profile (short arrows, magnitude represents relative extent of flow, shown only at left side of axis of symmetry) and electric stress (arrows from the interface) for $Ca=2$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$ at different times. Inset shows the variation of meridional $T_{s}$ (— ⋅ —), azimuthal $T_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}}$ (– – –) and mean $T_{m}$ (——) membrane tensions along the arclength.

Figure 14

Figure 14.Effect of membrane capacitance on the dynamics of deformation of a capsule with Skalak membrane considering ${\hat{G}}_{m}=0$ at $Ca=0.25$. Curves are: ${\hat{C}}_{m}=1$ (⋯⋯), ${\hat{C}}_{m}=50$ (– – –) and ${\hat{C}}_{m}=100$ (——) at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$; and ${\hat{C}}_{m}=1$ (— ⋅ —), ${\hat{C}}_{m}=50$ (— ⋅ ⋅ —) and ${\hat{C}}_{m}=100$ (– – ⋅ – –) at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$.

Figure 15

Figure 15.Shape evolution of a capsule with Skalak membrane at ${\hat{C}}_{m}=1$ for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$ and $Ca=0.45$.

Figure 16

Figure 16.Effect of membrane conductance on the deformation of a capsule with Skalak membrane considering ${\hat{C}}_{m}=50$ at $Ca=0.25$. Curves are: ${\hat{G}}_{m}=0$ (⋯⋯), ${\hat{G}}_{m}=1$ (– – –) and ${\hat{G}}_{m}=10$ (——) at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$; and ${\hat{G}}_{m}=0$ (— ⋅ —), ${\hat{G}}_{m}=1$ (— ⋅ ⋅ —) and ${\hat{G}}_{m}=10$ (– – ⋅ – –) at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$.

Figure 17

Figure 17.Shape evolution of a capsule with Skalak membrane at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$ for $Ca=0.45$ and ${\hat{C}}_{m}=50$ for conducting membrane. Panels (a–d) represent shapes during deformation at ${\hat{G}}_{m}=1$ and panels (e–h) represent shapes during deformation at ${\hat{G}}_{m}=10$.

Figure 18

Figure 18.Comparison of the numerical simulation results for the dynamics of capsule deformation with $t_{H}=10$ (– – –) and $t_{H}=1$ (——) for $Ca=0.45$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$.

Figure 19

Figure 19.Shape evolution of a capsule with Skalak membrane at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{r}=1$ with $t_{H}=10$ for non-conducting membrane with ${\hat{C}}_{m}=50$. Panels (a–d) represent shapes during deformation at $Ca=0.45$ and panels (e–h) represent deformed shapes at $Ca=0.8$.

Figure 20

Figure 20.Intermediate maximum degree of deformation as a function of capillary number for a neo-Hookean membrane at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$ (— ⋅ —) and $0.1$ (——), and for a Skalak membrane at $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$ (⋯⋯) and $0.1$ (– – –). Inset shows the degree of deformation at steady state as a function of capillary number for the corresponding cases.

Figure 21

Figure 21.Breakup shapes for a capsule with a Skalak membrane at (a) $Ca=0.46$ and (b) $Ca=30$ and a neo-Hookean membrane at (c) $Ca=0.3$ and (d) $Ca=0.6$.

Figure 22

Figure 22.Comparison of dynamics obtained from SEM, BEM-SM and BEM-CM. At $Ca=0.01$ the dynamics are reported for SEM (– – –), BEM-SM (⋯⋯) and BEM-CM (——). At $Ca=0.05$ the dynamics are for SEM (— ⋅ —), BEM-SM (– – ⋅ – –) and for BEM-CM (— ⋅ ⋅ —).

Figure 23

Figure 23.Comparison of numerically obtained ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}=0$ (○), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/4$ (▿), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2.5$ (▵) and $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2$ (♢)) and analytically obtained ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}=0$ (– – –), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/4$ (— ⋅ —), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2.5$ (⋯⋯) and $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2$ (——)) transmembrane potential (a), normal electric stress (b) and tangential electric stress (c) as functions of time for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=1$.

Figure 24

Figure 24.Comparison of numerically obtained ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}=0$ (○), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/4$ (▿), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2.5$ (▵) and $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2$ (♢)) and analytically obtained ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}=0$ (– – –), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/4$ (— ⋅ —), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2.5$ (⋯⋯) and $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2$ (——)) transmembrane potential (a), normal electric stress (b) and tangential electric stress (c) as functions of time for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=10$.

Figure 25

Figure 25.Comparison of numerically obtained ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}=0$ (○), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/4$ (▿), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2.5$ (▵) and $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2$ (♢)) and analytically obtained ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}=0$ (– – –), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/4$ (— ⋅ —), $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2.5$ (⋯⋯) and $\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}/2$ (——)) transmembrane potential (a), normal electric stress (b) and tangential electric stress (c) as functions of time for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{r}=0.1$.

Supplementary material: File

Das and Thaokar supplementary material 1

Das and Thaokar supplementary material

Download Das and Thaokar supplementary material 1(File)
File 213.6 KB