Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:37:08.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dual silencing of epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors significantly limits growth of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in nude mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

X Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China
Y Yuan*
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Wuhan University School of Medicine, China
J Song
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Wuhan University School of Medicine, China Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immune-related Diseases and the Center for Medical Research, Wuhan University, China
W Chen
Affiliation:
Experimental Animal Centre, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China
J Li
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China
L Ye
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China
X Meng
Affiliation:
Department of Forensic Medicine, Wuhan University School of Medicine, China
D Xia
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Wuhan University School of Medicine, China
*
Address for correspondence: Prof Yulin Yuan, Department of Anatomy, Wuhan University School of Medicine, 135 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei 430071 PRChina. Fax:  +86 27 87307966 E-mail: Yuanyulin19620120@126.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

We examined the effects of dual silencing of epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors on the growth of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in nude mice; we also assessed potential side effects in these animals.

Methods:

Short hairpin ribonucleic acid expression vectors targeting epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors were constructed. Short hairpin ribonucleic acid plasmids targeting one or both receptors were transfected into human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells in nude mice. We then assessed epidermal growth factor receptor and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor expression and also cellular apoptosis. Peripheral blood was collected and subjected to haematological and biochemical analysis.

Results:

The findings demonstrated that transfection with dual plasmids (targeting both epidermal growth factor receptor and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor) resulted in tumour cell growth inhibition of 84.78 per cent, and a significant increase in the number of necrotic and apoptotic cells, compared with single plasmid treatment. The short hairpin ribonucleic acid had no significant side effects on the heart, liver, kidney, spleen or blood system in this experimental model.

Conclusion:

These results indicate that, in nude mice, dual silencing of both epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors results in more apoptosis and greater nasopharyngeal cancer cell growth inhibition, compared with silencing of either epidermal growth factor receptor alone or insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor alone. This occurred without significant side effects in the experimental animals.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008
Figure 0

Fig. 1 The structure of short hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) segments and their vector. (a) Predicted structure of shRNA segments. (b) Design of shRNA template for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) and (HK). (c) Diagram of the vector. An shRNA encoding template was inserted between BamHI and HindIII restriction sites downstream of the U6 promoter. Transcripts of the template (see part (b)) will form a 19-nucleotide, double-stranded stem with a 9-nucleotide loop hairpin that targets either mouse EGFR or IGF-1R transcriptase messenger RNA (mRNA) or no human gene mRNA. T = thymine; C = cytosine; G = guanine; A = adenine; CMV IE = cytomegalovirus; EGFP = enhanced green fluorescent protein; HSV TK = thymidine kinase; DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid; NCS = neocarzinostatin; MCS = multiple cloning sites

Figure 1

Table I Effect of shRNA plasmid treatment on tumour volumes and inhibition ratios in nude mice

Figure 2

Table II Relative value of EGFR and IGF-1R MRNA in the treatment groups

Figure 3

Table III Effect of shRNA plasmid treatment on peripheral blood in nude mice

Figure 4

Table IV Effect of shRNA plasmid treatment on biochemical parameters in nude mice

Figure 5

Fig. 2 Subcutaneous tumour growth. Tumour growth was greatly suppressed following treatment with short hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and shRNA insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) plasmids together, compared with treatment with shRNA EGFR plasmid alone or shRNA IGF-1R plasmid alone (*p < 0.05), and also compared with treatment with shRNA (HK) plasmid or saline (▴p < 0.01). Whiskers show outliers.

Figure 6

Fig. 3 Fluorescent protein expression in the tumours. Many tumour cells with green fluorescence were present in mice transfected with (a) short hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plasmid alone, (b) shRNA insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) plasmid alone, (c) both shRNA EGFR and shRNA IGF-1R plasmids together, and (c) shRNA HK plasmid. No fluorescence was found in tumours from mice transfected with saline (e).

Figure 7

Fig. 4 Histopathological structure of the subcutaneous tumours. Necrotic tumour cells were present in mice transfected with: (a) short hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plasmid alone (moderate amount of necrosis); (b) shRNA insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) plasmid alone (moderate amount); (c) both shRNA EGFR and shRNA IGF-1R plasmids (large amount); (d) shRNA HK plasmid (small amount); and (e) saline (small amount) (H&E; ×1000).

Figure 8

Fig. 5 Photomicrographs showing apoptotic cells within the subcutaneous tumours, seen as scattered, dark-staining cells (arrowheads) with numerous nuclear particles. Only a few apoptotic cells were present in tumours from mice transfected with (a) short hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plasmid alone or (b) shRNA insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) plasmid alone; these tumours stained light. More apoptotic cells were present in tumours from mice transfected with (c) both shRNA EGFR and shRNA IGF-1R plasmids. Apoptotic cells were not easy to see in tumours from mice transfected with (d) shRNA HK plasmid or (e) saline (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL); ×400).

Figure 9

Fig. 6 Photomicrographs showing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression in the subcutaneous tumours. Cells with EGFR protein expression were present in tumours from mice transfected with: (a) short hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) EGFR plasmid alone (moderate staining); (b) shRNA insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) plasmid alone (moderate staining); (c) both shRNA EGFR and shRNA IGF-1R plasmids (light staining); (d) shRNA HK plasmid (dark staining); and (e) saline (dark staining) (Streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase; ×1000).

Figure 10

Fig. 7 Photomicrographs showing insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) expression in the subcutaneous tumours. Cells with IGF-1R receptor protein expression were present in mice transfected with: (a) short hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plasmid alone (moderate staining); (b) shRNA IGF-1R plasmid alone (moderate staining); (c) both shRNA EGFR and shRNA IGF-1R plasmids (light staining); (d) shRNA HK plasmid (dark staining); and (e) saline (dark staining) (Streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase; ×1000).

Figure 11

Fig. 8 Protein expression scores for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) expression within tumour samples, following the five treatments. The score following treatment with both shRNA EGFR and shRNA IGF-1R plasmids was much lower than that following treatment with shRNA EGFR plasmid alone, shRNA IGF-1R plasmid alone, shRNA HK plasmid or saline. ▴p < 0.01, compared with treatment with shRNA HK plasmid or saline; *p < 0.05, compared with treatment with shRNA EGFR plasmid alone or shRNA IGF-1R plasmid alone. Whiskers show outliers.