Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T00:51:40.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determinants of life-history traits in a fish ectoparasite: a hierarchical analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2011

G. LOOT*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, U.M.R 5174, C.N.R.S – Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse cedex 4, France
N. POULET
Affiliation:
ONEMA, Le Nadar Hall C 5 sq Félix Nadar 94300 Vincennes, France
S. BROSSE
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, U.M.R 5174, C.N.R.S – Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse cedex 4, France
L. TUDESQUE
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, U.M.R 5174, C.N.R.S – Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse cedex 4, France
F. THOMAS
Affiliation:
IRD, MIVEGEC (UMR CNRS/IRD/UM1), 911 Av. Agropolis, BP 64501, FR-34394 Montpellier cedex 5, France
S. BLANCHET
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, U.M.R 5174, C.N.R.S – Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse cedex 4, France Station Expérimentale du CNRS à Moulis, U.S.R 2936, 09100 Moulis, France
*
*Corresponding author: Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, U.M.R 5174, C.N.R.S – Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse cedex 4, France. Tel: +33 5 61 55 85 81. Fax: +33 5 61 55 67 28. E-mail: loot@cict.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Objective. Unravelling the determinants of parasite life-history traits in natural settings is complex. Here, we deciphered the relationships between biotic, abiotic factors and the variation in 4 life-history traits (body size, egg presence, egg number and egg size) in the fish ectoparasite Tracheliastes polycolpus. We then determined the factors affecting the strength of the trade-off between egg number and egg size. Methods. To do so, we used 4-level (parasite, microhabitat, host and environment) hierarchical models coupled to a field database. Results. Variation in life-history traits was mostly due to individual characteristics measured at the parasite level. At the microhabitat level (fins of fish hosts), parasite number was positively related to body size, egg presence and egg number. Higher parasite number on fins was positively associated with individual parasite fitness. At the host level, host body size was positively related to the individual fitness of the parasite; parasites were bigger and more fecund on bigger hosts. In contrast, factors measured at the environmental level had a weak influence on life-history traits. Finally, a site-dependent trade-off between egg number and egg size existed in this population. Conclusion. Our study illustrates the importance of considering parasite life-history traits in a hierarchical framework to decipher complex links between biotic, abiotic factors and parasite life-history traits.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Table 1. Distance from the source, mean temperature, number of hosts and parasite samples for each sampling site

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Pattern of variance decomposition for 4 life-history traits of the ectoparasite Tracheliastes polycolpus, (A) parasite body size, (B) presence of eggs, (C) average size of the eggs per parasite and (D) number of eggs per parasite. The total observed variance for each trait was decomposed among 4 hierarchical levels of sampling, namely within site, within host, within microhabitat (i.e. the fins on which the parasite was sampled) and within parasite. For each trait, variance was decomposed using hierarchical linear models. ‘Residuals’ is the percentage of variance that was not explained by the 4 spatial levels under consideration.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Scale-explicit coefficient estimates. Solid lines represent 95% confidence interval effects of variables at 3–4 levels of the model (site level, host level, microhabitat level and parasite level). Intervals not overlapping the zero line are significantly different from zero. Dots represent point estimate of parameter value. Predictors of (A) parasite body size, (B) egg presence, (C) egg size, and (D) egg number. The asterisks (***) indicate significant results (P<0·05).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Influence of the body size of the ectoparasite Tracheliastes polycolpus on the probability of carrying eggs. The probabilities of carrying eggs are those predicted from a linear-mixed model with binomial error term (see the main text). Parasites with intermediate body size had the higher probability of carrying eggs. The relationship is presented for each sampling site independently.

Figure 4

Table 2. Results of general linear mixed models used to evaluate the effects of various predictors on parasite body size, egg presence, egg size and egg number of the parasite Tracheliastes polycolpus

(Presented as statistical outputs for the categorical predictor (fin identity) included in the models, as well as for the interaction term between fin identity and the number of parasites per fin. Outputs for the other (continuous) predictors are presented in Fig. 2.)
Figure 5

Table 3. Results of a General linear model used to evaluate the effects of sampling site, host body size and the egg size on the egg number of the parasite Tracheliastes polycolpus

(The 2-term interactions were considered to test for the existence of a trade-off between number and size of eggs. Significant P-values (P<0·05) are in bold.)
Figure 6

Fig. 4. Results of regression analysis between egg number (residuals) and egg size (residuals) of 7 populations of Tracheliastes polycolpus. Straight solid lines indicate significant trends (* P<0·05; *** P<0·001). Stippled lines indicate non-significant relationship.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Path diagram revealing the interactions between life-history traits of parasite Tracheliastes polycolpus(parasite body size and reproductive output variables) and host and environmental factors.