Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T01:31:41.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimal Measurement of Ice-Sheet deformation from Surface-Marker Arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

D.R. MacAyeal*
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surface strain-rate is best observed by fitting a strain-rate ellipsoid to the measured movement of a stake network, or other collection of surface features, using a least-squares procedure. Error of the resulting fit varies as (LΔt√n)-1 where L is the stake separation, Δt is the time period between initial and final stake survey, and n is the number of stakes in the network. This relation suggests that, if n is sufficiently high, the traditional practice of re-visiting stake-network sites on successive field seasons may be replaced by a less costly single-year operation. A demonstration using Ross Ice Shelf data shows that reasonably accurate measurements can be obtained from 12 stakes after only four days of deformation. The least-squares procedure may also aid airborne photogrammetric surveys in that reducing the time interval between survey and re-survey could permit better surface-feature recognition.

Résumé

Résumé

Mesures de déformation d’une nappe de glace à l’aide d’un réseau de témoins de surface. La vitesse de déformation de surface est très bien obtenue en adaptant un ellipsoïde de déformation au mouvement mesuré d’un réseau de balises ou à d’autres ensembles de marqueurs de La surface avec l’aide d’une optimisation par les moindres carrés. L’erreur résultant de l’approximation varie comme (LΔt√n)-1, ou L est la distance entre balises, Δ t la période de temps entre les relevés et n le nombre de témoins du dispositif. Cette relation suggère qu’avec un n suffisamment élevé, les habituelles visites annuelles peuvent être remplacées par une seule année d’operation, bien moins coûteuse. Un test sur les données du Ross Ice Shelf montre qu’une précision raisonnable peut être atteinte avec 12 témoins seulement en 4 jours de déformation. Les moindres carrés peuvent aussi être une aide pour les relevés photogrammétriques aériens, en ce sens qu’en raccourcissant le temps entre deux relevés, ils permettent une meilleure reconnaissance des caractéristiques de la surface.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Optimale Messung der Deformation von Eisdecken mit einem Netz van Oberflächenpegeln. Die Oberflächendeformation wird am besten durch die Anpassung eines Deformationsellipsoides an die in einem Pegelnetz gemessenen Bewegungen oder durch anderweitige Erhebung von Oberflächendaten unter Anwendung der Methode der kleinsten Quadrate bestimmt. Der Fehler der so gewonnenen Anpassung ändert sich mit (LΔt√n)-1, wobei L der Abstand zwischen den Pegeln, Δt die Zeit zwischen der Anfangs- und Endmessung und n die Anzahl der Pegel im Netzwerk ist. Diese Beziehung lässt vermuten, dass bei genügend grossem n die traditionelle Wiederholungsmessung eines Netzwerkes in aufeinanderfolgenden Feldkampagnen durch eine weniger teure Operation in einem Jahr ersetzt werden kann. Ein Versuch mit Daten vom Ross Ice Shelf zeigt, dass ausreichend genaue Messungen mit 12 Pegeln nach nur vier Tagen der Deformation gewonnen werden können. Das Ausgleichungsverfahren dürfte auch luftphotogrammetrische Aufnahmen erleichtern insofern, als eine Verkürzung der Zeit zwischen Erst- und Zweiiaufnahme zu einer besseren Identifizeirung von Oberflächenstrukturen führt.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1985
Figure 0

Fig. 1 The idealized n-leg rosette considered in this study for the purpose of error analysis consists of n outlying stakes surrounding a central stake (0) at equal angular intervals and with equal radial separation. Typical rosettes used on the Rose Ice Shelf had n = 3 (Thomas and others, in press). Also shown above is a modified n-leg rosette that uses m + k < n stakes. This rosette design achieves n-legs by having k = n/m stakes, and may be more practical under actual field conditions.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Uniaxial strain-rate measured on the Ross Ice Shelf at station C-16 (lat. 81°11′38″S., long. 189°30′09″W.) is plotted as a function of distance along a line bearing 321°T. The relative ice-shelf surface elevation along the line is also plotted. Open circles denote stake positions. The error level of the observed strain-rate is approximately 1.0 × 10−4/year.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. The maximum error of the velocity gradients, expressed as percent of is plotted as a function of n and Δt. Scale factors used in the calculation of these graphs are = 10−10/s and L = 2.0 × 103 m. Notice that 3% accuracy can be achieved by a 13-leg rosette in 28 d or by a 3-leg rosette in 84 d. Under some circumstances, it may be preferance to deploy rosettes having n >15 so that all measurements can be accomplished within one field season. This diagram, and other similar ones, can be used by field glaciologists to design their field program to maximize the data return for a given logistic effort.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Four 3-leg rosette (0, E, F, G) planted upstream of Crary Ice Rise on the Ross Ice Shelf were re-surveyed after an average time period of 4.3 d. A fifth rosette (G8) planted during RIGGS provides an accurate measurement of the actual strain-rate to be used as a reference. In this study, the four 3-leg rosettes are combined into one 12-leg rosette to see how the subsequent strain-rate measurement provided by the 4.2 d period compares with the actual strain-rate.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Stake positions of the 12-leg rosette are mapped along with the relative stake velocities. The principal axes of the strain-rate measured using the 12-leg rosette are compared with those measured during RIGGS (G8) (Thomas and others, in press). Also shown are the principal axes resulting from the 3-leg rosette E using a 3.9 d interval between survey and re-survey. Uncertainty of the observed velocities is variable. The shaded ellipse represents, for example, the velocity uncertainty for the three most outlying stakes. The ellipse should be oriented perpendicular to the position vector.

Figure 5

Table I Principal Strain-Rates measured by various rosettes