Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T22:58:57.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of climate change and human influence in the distribution and range overlap between two widely distributed avian scavengers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2020

FAUSTO SÁENZ-JIMÉNEZ*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología Funcional, Unidad de Ecología y Sistemática (UNESIS), Departamento de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia. Fundación Neotropical, Bogotá, Colombia.
OCTAVIO ROJAS-SOTO
Affiliation:
Red de Biología Evolutiva, Laboratorio de Bioclimatología, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Ver., México.
JAIRO PÉREZ-TORRES
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología Funcional, Unidad de Ecología y Sistemática (UNESIS), Departamento de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
ENRIQUE MARTÍNEZ-MEYER
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., México.
JAMES K. SHEPPARD
Affiliation:
San Diego Zoo Global, Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego, USA.
*
*Author for correspondence; e-mail: saenzf@javeriana.edu.co
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Climate change can cause geographic displacement of the ecological niche of a species, so that similar species that previously did not coexist could begin to face new interactions. Such geographic displacement and increased competition can also be exacerbated by anthropic intervention. Until less than 100 years ago, Vultur gryphus and Coragyps atratus did not coexist. Nowadays, possibly as a result of climate change, changes in the distributions of both species created areas where they are now sympatric. Through ecological niche modeling, we evaluated the possible effects that future scenarios of climate change and human influence would have on the distribution and sympatry between the two species. Our models predict that the current distribution of V. gryphus will be reduced between 18% and 24% by 2050 and between 21% and 32% by 2070. Additionally, they predict that the distribution of C. atratus will be reduced by 31–52% by the year 2050 and 15–60% by 2070. The two algorithms predict a reduction in the areas of sympatry. However, for the northern Andes the overlap between the two species will increase, reaching up to 70% in the year 2070. The distribution of C. atratus will move towards higher areas in the altitudinal gradient, and this will generate an increase in the current sympatry between both species. No clear trend was observed on the effect of human influences on the areas of overlap between the scenarios evaluated. The possible effects of climate change and anthropic intervention in future scenarios found in this study highlight the need to include these effects in future analyses and conservation programs of V. gryphus and other threatened vultures.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of BirdLife International
Figure 0

Table 1. Percentage contribution of each variable to the current distribution models of V. gryphus and C. atratus obtained with the Maxent algorithm. Percentage contribution: measures the increase in likelihood associated with modelling rules based on each environmental variable and then divides this by the total gain in likelihood to calculate the percent of the total gain associated with each variable (Phillips 2017). Permutation importance: randomizes the values for each environmental variable between the presences and background points in order to make that variable uninformative and then measures the resulting drop in area under the curve AUC. Values are normalized to give percentages (Phillips 2017).

Figure 1

Table 2. Shifts of the geographic range areas of V. gryphus and C. atratus for each model with the percentage of area lost and compared to the current scenario. ACCESS 1.0: Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator, HadGEM2-AO: Hadley Global Environment Model 2 (Atmosphere-Ocean), MIROC 5: Model for Interdisciplinary Research On Climate version 5.

Figure 2

Figure 1. Shifts of the geographic range of V. gryphus (a, b) and C. atratus (c, d) in two scenarios: Current distribution (a, c) and 2070 distribution with RCP 8.5 (b, d). Grey areas in b and d show the regions where there is no shift in the distribution between future scenarios and current scenario (stable); red areas correspond to the portions where the current distribution reduces in the 2070 scenario (loss) and green where the distribution increases (gain). Models were performed with GARP.

Figure 3

Table 3. Shifts in overlap areas between V. gryphus and C. atratus in different climatic change scenarios and regions (Northern Andes, Central Andes and Austral Andes). Models performed with GARP for ACCES 1.0 scenarios. Areas in square kilometers.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Overlapping potential areas obtained with GARP between V. gryphus and C. atratus in Northern Andes under a current scenario (a) and under 2070 scenario (ACCES 1.0, RCP 8.5) (b). Red colour represents overlapping areas and grey represents the geographic range areas of V. gryphus for each scenario. Bars to the right show the geographic range and areas of overlap in approximate square kilometers for each scenario.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Measurement of niche overlap between the two species in environmental space. Principal Component Analysis (top right) and the representation of the ecological niches in the first two axes using a smoothed kernel density function of observed occurrences of the Black Vulture (top centre) and Andean Condor (top left). The grey-to-black shading represents the grid cell density of the species’ occurrences (black being the highest density) while a white background color indicates the environmental conditions in which the species were not recorded. The first dashed line represents the 50% of the available environment and the solid line represents the 100% (top). In the bottom (left) is the histogram showing the results of equivalency test; and the niche similarity test between the Black Vulture vs. the Andean Condor (center) and the Andean Condor vs. the Black Vulture (right).

Supplementary material: File

Sáenz-Jiménez et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2
Download Sáenz-Jiménez et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.3 KB