Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:39:14.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of the physiological consequences of sympathetic denervation of the heart caused by the arterial switch procedure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2010

Cecilia Falkenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Stefan Hallhagen
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Krister Nilsson
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthetics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Boris Nilsson
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Ingegerd Östman-Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Correspondence to: Professor Ingegerd Östman-Smith, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Gothenburg University, SE-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden. Tel: +46 31 3434512; Fax: +46 31 3435947; E-mail: ingegerd.ostman-smith@pediat.gu.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

The arterial switch operation is the corrective operation for transposition of the great arteries, defined as the combination of concordant atrioventricular and discordant ventriculo–arterial connections, but there have been concerns about silent subendocardial ischaemia on exercise and coronary artery growth. The arterial switch divides the majority of the sympathetic nerves entering the heart; we have studied the effects of coronary flow and sensitivity to catecholamine stimulation in an animal model.

Methods

A total of 10 piglets were operated on cardiopulmonary bypass with section and resuturing of aortic trunk, pulmonary artery and both coronary arteries, with 13 sham-operated controls. After 5–7 weeks of recovery, seven simulated switch survivors and 13 controls were studied.

Results

Basal heart rate was significantly higher in switch piglets: in vivo mean (standard deviation) 112 (12) versus sham 100 (10) beats per minute, (p = 0.042); in vitro (Langendorff preparation): 89 (9) versus sham 73 (8) beats per minute (p = 0.0056). In vivo maximal heart rate in response to epinephrine was increased in switch piglets, 209 (13) versus 190 (17) beats per minute (p = 0.044). In vitro dose–response curves to norepinephrine were shifted leftward and upwards (p = 0.0014), with an 80% increase in heart rate induced by 0.095 (0.053) norepinephrine micromole per litre perfusate in switch hearts versus 0.180 (0.035) norepinephrine micromole per litre (p = 0.023). Increase in coronary flow on norepinephrine stimulation and maximal coronary flow were significantly reduced in switch hearts: 0.3 (0.2) versus 0.8 (0.4) millilitre per gram heart weight (p = 0.045) and 2.5 (0.4) versus 3.1 (0.4) millilitre per gram heart (p = 0.030), respectively.

Conclusions

A combination of increased intrinsic heart rate, increased sensitivity to chronotropic actions of norepinephrine, and a decreased maximal coronary flow creates potential for a mismatch between perfusion and energy demands.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1 The in vivo baseline heart rate in sham- and simulated switch-operated piglets around 6 weeks after surgery. The box and whisker plots illustrate the median as a horizontal line, arithmetic mean as a cross, with the central quartiles enclosed in the box and the whiskers indicating upper and lower quartiles.

Figure 1

Figure 2 (a) Dose–response curve with percent increase in heart rate in anaesthetised piglets after intravenous epinephrine (EPI) injection. The dotted line indicates the dose–response curve of sham-operated animals and the solid line that of simulated switch-operated piglets. The symbols indicate median response, and the vertical lines the interquartile range. The doses were calculated as microgrammes per kilo, thus X-axis is labelled as log dose in microgrammes per kilo; the doses given were 0.055, 0.11, 0.27, 0.55, 1.1, 2.2, 4.4, and 8.7 nanomoles per kilogram of body weight. (b) Peak heart rate responses after intravenous epinephrine injection in anaesthetised piglets. Symbols and doses as in Figure 2a; * denotes significantly different from sham-operated piglets on Mann–Whitney U-test, p = 0.049.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Baseline intrinsic heart rate in the isolated heart perfused in the Langendorff preparation about 6 weeks after surgery. The box and whisker plots show the same symbols as in Figure 1.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Dose–response curve to norepinephrine (NE) in the Langendorff preparation. Percent increase in heart rate is illustrated as open circles for hearts from sham-operated pigs, and filled squares for hearts about 6 weeks after switch surgery. Variations in coronary flow meant that although very similar not all doses were absolutely identical between various experiments. Individual observations are plotted as symbols only; where the doses were identical in several experiments, the symbol denotes the median, and the brackets the range. Norepinephrine dose range used for the dose–response curves corresponded to 0.047–0.38 micromoles per litre perfusate. On four-criteria analysis, that is, bottom, top, Hill slope and 50 percent of maximal response, the dose--response curves were significantly different between sham- and switch-operated piglets.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Comparison of the norepinephrine dose that produces an 80 percent increase in heart rate in the Langendorff preparation about 6 weeks after sham and switch operation. The box and whisker plots show symbols as in Figure 1. An outlier observation is indicated by a dot.

Figure 5

Figure 6 (a) Baseline coronary flow in the Langendorff preparation, expressed as millilitres per gram heart weight, in isolated switch- or sham-operated heart; there is no significant difference (p = 0.51). The box and whisker plots show symbols as in Figure 1. (b) Increase in coronary flow from baseline to maximal flow in individual piglets after norepinephrine injection, expressed as millilitres per gram heart weight, in isolated switch- or sham-operated heart; symbols as in Figure 1. (c) Maximal coronary flow after norepinephrine injection, expressed as millilitres per gram heart weight, in isolated switch- or sham-operated hearts; symbols as in Figure 1.