Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T19:17:53.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray diffraction patterns and anatomical properties of claw tissues of beef and dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2007

M. P. BROWNE
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen AB24 3RY, UK
D. W. L. HUKINS
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
J. M. S. SKAKLE
Affiliation:
College of Physical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Meston Building, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK
C. H. KNIGHT
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL, UK
K. A. K. HENDRY
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL, UK
C. J. WILDE
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL, UK
H. GALBRAITH*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen AB24 3RY, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: h.galbraith@abdn.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Medial claws from the right hind feet were obtained post mortem from four 19–20-month-old beef heifers and from four 28-month-old first-calving dairy heifers 3–4 days postpartum. X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies were undertaken on samples of soft and hard (cornified) integumental tissues of dorsal wall, sole and heel (bulb) for varying sites and planes of exposure. The measurements were interpreted as defining diffraction patterns and intermolecular spacings of cytoskeletal and extracellular fibrous structural proteins. The orientation of these proteins was examined in relation to physical characteristics and function including bearing of body weight by these tissues.

Physical measurements taken included impression hardness which showed typically greater values for wall than sole and variable differences between horn of dairy and beef origin and husbandry systems. Claws from dairy heifers had significantly smaller values for toe (dorsal wall) angle, claw height and heel height and thickness of solear horn and heel soft tissue. Although few were studied, the results reflected typical husbandry origins and indicated the susceptibility to the lesion formation well recognized in postpartum dairy cattle.

Typical XRD patterns for horn samples showed defined arcs of reflectance on the equatorial axis consistent with findings for the presence of α-helices in fibrils reported to occur in other hard-keratin-containing integumental tissues. However, reflectance on the meridional axis also reported for these other tissues was not detected. A similar defined pattern was obtained for less than 0·10 of samples of internal soft pre-cornified epidermal and attached dermal tissue although the values for intermolecular ‘d’ spacing for these were consistent with those reported for type I collagen. Diffuse reflection patterns were thus evident for the majority of samples of soft tissue epidermis and dermis and also for adipose tissue of the digital cushion.

The formation of defined arcs of reflectance allowed the determination of fibril alignment in wall and solear horn. For the orientated samples of dorsal wall horn tissue, the outer layer showed a longitudinal angle of orientation essentially maintained proximal to distal. This pattern was maintained throughout the depth of horn at the proximal site. In contrast, layers in mid-wall and towards the distal edge showed a greater circumferential (horizontal) orientation in sections collected anterior to posterior towards the inner corial, including laminar, tissues. The orientation of fibrils in inner wall horn appears to relate to the direction of load-bearing forces in connecting horn to the distal phalanx. Horizontal alignment of fibrils was observed in the sole. In presenting the long axis of cells to the ground surface this orientation may facilitate erosive forces and contribute to the thinning of cornified sole horn under adverse underfoot conditions.

Information

Type
Animal
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Location of positions of (i) measurement of impression hardness (dorsal wall: 1, proximal and 2, distal; sole apex: 3; pre-bulbar: axial, 4 and abaxial aspect, 5) and (ii) collection of samples for measurement of anatomical dimensions or XRD studies (a, b, c proximal, mid- and distal wall respectively and d, apex; e, sole–bulb junction and f, bulbar regions). See Materials and Methods section for details.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Conventional claw measurements: length (at dorsal border) (A), height (B), heel (bulb) height (C), diagonal (D) and toe (dorsal) angle (E) (Greenough 1997).

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Schematic representation of the claw section showing the planes of orientation through which the X-ray beams passed (R=radial: L=longitudinal).

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Typical XRD pattern of a section of cornified horn showing the presence of arcs on the equatorial (horizontal) axis at maxima of approximately 0·96 nm (arrowed) typical of hard α-keratin. Note the diffuse disordered circular pattern (arrowed) and the absence of specific areas of intensity on the meridional (vertical) axis perpendicular to the equatorial axis.

Figure 4

Table 1.Mean values (with pooled s.e.d.) for impression hardness measurements on claws of 8 animals at 5 sites

Figure 5

Table 2.Mean values (with s.e.m.) for external claw measurements of dairy and beef heifers

Figure 6

Table 3.Mean values (mm with s.e.m.) for internal claw measurements of dairy and beef heifers

Figure 7

Fig. 5.Digital images showing typical sections of claw from (a) beef and (b) dairy production types.

Figure 8

Fig. 6.Typical diffraction patterns showing the absence of orientation of fibrils produced by (a) corial soft tissues and (b) fat pad at heel.

Figure 9

Table 4.Mean values (with s.e.m.) for angle of orientation of the proximal- and mid-wall sections progressing from outer to inner horn with radial X-ray beam passing from the outer to the inner surface of the wall. (s.e.d. value between individual means for site of collection=31·5 (18 df))

Figure 10

Table 5.Angle of orientation (mean with s.e.m.) from outer to inner wall sections of the distal wall site determined by X-rays applied in radial and longitudinal planes. (s.e.d. values between individual means for site of collection for (a)=26·9 (18 df) and (b)=48·7 (18 df))

Figure 11

Fig. 7.Saggital representation of alignment of fibrils in horn of (i) dorsal wall from the lower perioplic line (LPL) to the dorsal border and (ii) apex of the sole.

Figure 12

Table 6.Angle of orientation (mean with s.e.m.) of the proximal wall horn and the apex of the sole with the X-ray beam passing in the longitudinal plane proximal-distal for the wall and anterior–posterior for the sole