%20-%20https://sketch.com%20--%3e%3ctitle%3e3ECBBF50-FD08-412A-943D-2CFC5E025A16%3c/title%3e%3cdesc%3eCreated%20with%20sketchtool.%3c/desc%3e%3cg%20id='Stylesheet'%20stroke='none'%20stroke-width='1'%20fill='none'%20fill-rule='evenodd'%3e%3cg%20transform='translate(-926.000000,%20-668.000000)'%20id='BUTTONS'%3e%3cg%20transform='translate(100.000000,%20597.000000)'%3e%3cg%20id='BTN-/-RIGHTS'%20transform='translate(816.000000,%2065.000000)'%3e%3cg%20id='ICON-/-Rights'%20transform='translate(10.000000,%206.000000)'%3e%3cpath%20d='M13.5752841,0%20L1.34943182,0%20C0.59375,0%200,0.586666667%200,1.33333333%20L0,22.6666667%20C0,23.4133333%200.620738636,24%201.34943182,24%20L17.6505682,24%20C18.40625,24%2019,23.3866667%2019,22.6666667%20L19,5.36%20L13.5752841,0%20Z%20M13.5752841,1.89333333%20L17.0838068,5.36%20L13.5752841,5.36%20L13.5752841,1.89333333%20Z%20M1.34943182,22.6666667%20L1.34943182,1.33333333%20L12.1988636,1.33333333%20L12.1988636,5.36%20C12.1988636,6.10666667%2012.7926136,6.69333333%2013.5482955,6.69333333%20L17.6235795,6.69333333%20L17.6505682,22.6666667%20L1.34943182,22.6666667%20Z'%20id='Shape'%20fill='%23595959'%20fill-rule='nonzero'%3e%3c/path%3e%3ccircle%20id='Oval'%20stroke='%23595959'%20stroke-width='1.5'%20fill='%23595959'%20cx='9.5'%20cy='13.5355339'%20r='5.5'%3e%3c/circle%3e%3cpolyline%20id='Path-2'%20stroke='%23FFFFFF'%20stroke-width='1.5'%20transform='translate(9.500000,%2013.035534)%20rotate(45.000000)%20translate(-9.500000,%20-13.035534)%20'%20points='8%2016.0355339%2011%2016.0355339%2011%2010.0355339'%3e%3c/polyline%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
The 2002 Children's Nutrition Survey (CNS02) has yielded important data on the nutritional status of New Zealand (NZ) children aged 5–14 years(Reference Parnell, Scragg and Wilson1) and provides an opportunity to explore food and nutrient intake patterns by time of day. Foods and nutrients consumed by NZ children during breakfast (06.00 to 08.59 hours)(Reference Wilson, Parnell and Wohlers2) and school hours (09.00 to 13.59 hours)(Reference Regan, Parnell and Gray3) have previously been reported. To summarize, 84 % of children consumed some food or beverage at breakfast(Reference Wilson, Parnell and Wohlers2), >80 % between 09.00 and 11.59 hours and >90 % between 12.00 and 13.59 hours(Reference Regan, Parnell and Gray3). Eating breakfast was associated with better daily nutrient intakes overall(Reference Wilson, Parnell and Wohlers2). Children obtained approximately one-third of their daily nutrient intakes during school hours(Reference Regan, Parnell and Gray3). To complete the description of daily intake, the present paper describes the contribution of afternoon and evening eating to NZ children's diets.
The NZ Ministry of Health states that ‘children are generally very hungry after school and require a substantial snack to last them through until the evening meal’ and recommends breads and cereals as good snack foods, while keeping ‘treat’ foods (e.g. snack bars, confectionery, crisps, sweet biscuits and fizzy drinks) for ‘special times’(4). To our knowledge there are no studies of what NZ children actually eat during the afternoon.
An evening meal provides an opportunity to include a greater variety of food groups and particularly to increase vegetable intake. This can contribute significantly to intakes of nutrients that are consumed in smaller amounts at other times of the day. It is also often the only time of the day when children have the opportunity to eat in a family setting.
There is a dearth of comparable data on the food intake of children throughout the day. While literature highlights the role of the family meal in contributing to diet quality(Reference Gillman, Rifas-Shiman and Frazier5, Reference Videon and Manning6), descriptive data around the evening food consumption is lacking in New Zealand. Documenting foods and nutrients consumed during the afternoon and evening completes a unique picture of children's intakes throughout the day, and provides vital information to inform nutrition policy and identify areas for future targeted interventions.
Methods
The present study is a secondary analysis of the CNS02, a cross-sectional survey of a national sample of NZ children and adolescents aged 5–14 years, carried out during the 2002 school year.
A school-based sampling frame was used with oversampling of Maori and Pacific children. Of 190 schools sampled from private and state school rolls, 172 (91 %) participated. Recruitment from each school was proportionate to the number of students on the school roll. Children from selected schools were assigned to one of three ethnic groups: Maori, Pacific, or New Zealand European and Others (NZEO), with a different probability of selection for each ethnic group based on the ethnic distribution of children from 2001 school rolls. Of the 4728 children invited to participate, 3275 (69 %) participated.
Socio-economic status was assigned using the New Zealand Index of Deprivation (NZDep01), which is derived from the residential address of the child and based on eight dimensions of deprivation, including income, access to a car and living space(Reference Salmond and Crampton7). NZDep01 designation could not be assigned for 293 children, and BMI category was not available for 125 children, thus data are reported for 2875 children. Regional health ethics committees gave approval for the survey. Details of the survey methodology are described elsewhere(Reference Parnell, Scragg and Wilson1).
Dietary intake was collected using a computer-assisted three-pass 24 h recall in children's homes. All children under 10 years of age were interviewed in the presence of a parent/caregiver. At interview, the children were asked to recall foods consumed during the previous 24 h. Thus recorded intakes could span part of two consecutive days. In order to designate a day of intake, the date of intake was defined as the day prior to the interview date, if the interview commenced before 14.00 hours. Energy and nutrient intakes were calculated using the NZ food composition database (2002)(8). Foods consumed were coded into food groups (Table 1) and by time of consumption before calculating prevalence of consumption.
Food groups
*A full list of original food groups and items can be found in Parnell et al.(Reference Parnell, Scragg and Wilson1).
†Flavoured sugar sachets, reconstituted with water.
‘Consumers’ were defined by whether energy intake was greater than zero between 14.00 and 16.59 hours (afternoon) or between 17.00 and 23.59 hours (evening). As food consumption patterns differ between school days and non-school days (day category)(Reference Rockell, Parnell and Wilson9), 24 h diet recalls were coded as to whether consumption fell by day category.
Height and weight measurements were taken at each child's school using portable standardized equipment. The reference cut-off values of Cole et al.(Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal10) were used to categorize children as normal weight, overweight or obese based on BMI.
All statistical analyses were carried out using the STATA statistical software package version 10·01 SE (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Survey commands used sampling weights and primary sampling units (schools) to ensure results are representative of the NZ population, by distribution of age, sex and ethnicity. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationships between afternoon or evening consumption and nutrient intakes. Because age, sex, ethnicity, NZDep01, day category and body weight status have been associated with food choices and/or nutrient intakes, these variables were included in the model. Age was treated as a categorical variable (5–6, 7–10 and 11–14 years) and NZDep01 status as quintiles. Adjusted mean nutrient intakes for consumers and non-consumers were estimated based on these models. Similarly, logistic regression was used for estimating the prevalence (95 % CI) of consumers of specific food groups during the afternoon and evening, and the likelihood of consuming one food group when consuming another. Interactions between the demographic variables sex, age, ethnicity and BMI category were also tested in the models. A P value <0·05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Afternoon
During the afternoon 79 % of NZ children ate or drank a food or beverage (except water; Table 2). Older children (11–14 years) were less likely to eat/drink in the afternoon than children aged 5–6 years (75 % v. 81 %, OR = 0·68, P = 0·038). Pacific children were less like to consume food/drink during the afternoon than NZEO (76 % v. 83 %, OR = 0·68, P = 0·016). Children were more likely to eat/drink during the afternoon on a school day than a non-school day (81 % v. 71 %, OR = 1·68, P < 0·001). There was no effect of sex, BMI category or NZDep01 category on the likelihood of consuming food/drink during the afternoon.
Proportion consuming foods/beverages during the afternoonFootnote *: children aged 5–14 years (n 2875), 2002 Children's Nutrition Survey, New Zealand
NZEO, New Zealand European and Others.
All data adjusted for survey weightings.
* 14.00 to 16.59 hours; consumers of water only defined as non-consumers.
† Logistic regression controlled for day category, ethnicity, age, sex, New Zealand Index of Deprivation and BMI classification(Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal10), relative to the first category.
The mean energy intake during the afternoon was 1298 (95 % CI 1243, 1356) kJ (15 % of daily energy intake). Afternoon intakes contributed proportionately more carbohydrate (16 % of daily carbohydrate intake) than fat (9 %) or protein (8 %; Table 3).
Mean intake of selected nutrients during the afternoonFootnote *: children aged 5–14 years (n 2875), 2002 Children's Nutrition Survey, New Zealand
* 14.00 to 16.59 hours; consumers of water only are defined as non-consumers.
† Linear regression controlled for ethnicity, age, sex, New Zealand Index of Deprivation, day category and BMI classification(Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal10) and adjusted for survey weightings. Data were log-transformed for skewness, and are presented as geometric means.
The most commonly consumed food groups during the afternoon were: fruit (26 %), biscuits/crackers (21 %), confectionery (17 %), bread (15 %), powdered drinks/cordials (15 %), snack foods (13 %), sugar/jams/syrups (13 %), and sandwiches, milk and soft drinks (each 12 %; Table 4). In the afternoon, children were less likely to have fruit if they consumed grains/pasta (OR = 0·54, P = 0·016), confectionery (OR = 0·58, P = 0·013) or soft drinks (OR = 0·43, P < 0·001).
Proportion of children consuming food groups during the afternoonFootnote *: children aged 5–14 years (n 2875), 2002 Children's Nutrition Survey, New Zealand
* 14.00 to 16.59 hours.
† Food groups that at least 8 % of children consumed during the afternoon.
‡ Logistic regression controlled for ethnicity, age, sex, New Zealand Index of Deprivation, BMI classification(Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal10) and day category, and adjusted for survey weightings.
Children who consumed some food/drink during the afternoon had 16 % (1152 kJ) higher daily energy intake and 19 % higher daily Ca intake (93 mg); total fat intake did not differ between consumers and non-consumers.
Evening
Ninety-eight per cent of children reported they consumed some food or beverage (excluding water) during the evening. Foods and drinks consumed during the evening contributed 40 % (2882 (95 % CI 2806, 2960) kJ) of children's daily energy intake (adjusted for all covariates; Table 5). Older children consumed a greater proportion of their daily energy intake during the evening than younger children (5–6 years, 36 (95 % CI 34, 37) %; 7–10 years, 40 (95 % CI 38, 41) %; 11–15 years, 42 (95 % CI 41, 43) %; Wald test F = 18·04, P < 0·001). Relative to this 40 % evening energy intake, nutrients consumed during the evening in amounts which exceeded this proportion were: cholesterol, Se, vitamin B12, vitamin A, Zn, protein, niacin, fat, vitamin B6, vitamin C, vitamin E and Fe. Nutrients for which there was less than 40 % of daily intake consumed during the evening were: fibre, riboflavin, folate, carbohydrate, thiamin and Ca.
Mean nutrient intake during the eveningFootnote *: children aged 5–14 years (n 2875), 2002 Children's Nutrition Survey, New Zealand
All data adjusted for survey weightings.
* 17.00 to 23.59 hours.
† Linear regression controlled for ethnicity, age, sex, New Zealand Index of Deprivation, day category and BMI classification(Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal10).
‡ Data were log-transformed for skewness, and are presented as geometric means.
§ Data for Ca, retinol, glucose and sucrose were log-transformed for skewness, and are presented as geometric means of percentage of daily intake.
The most commonly consumed meat/protein food was poultry (24 %) followed by beef (15 %), fish/seafood (10 %) and sausage/processed meats (10 %; Table 6). Sixty-five per cent of children consumed an item from the group: beef, lamb, pork, poultry, other meat, sausage/processed meats and fish/seafood.
Proportion of children consuming food groups during the eveningFootnote *: children aged 5–14 years (n 2875), 2002 Children's Nutrition Survey, New Zealand
* 17.00 to 23.59 hours.
† Logistic regression controlled for ethnicity, age, sex, New Zealand Index of Deprivation, BMI classification(Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal10) and day category, and adjusted for survey weightings.
Commonly consumed starch staples included potato/kumara/taro (30 %), grains/pasta (28 %), bread (23 %) and hot chips (17 %). Nineteen per cent of children consumed fruit. Twenty-three per cent of children drank powdered drinks/cordials during the evening and 21 % drank soft drinks (42 % drank at least one of these sweetened beverages). Milk was consumed by 19 % of children. Of children consuming powdered drinks, soft drinks or milk during the evening, few (<7 %) consumed more than one kind. Children were more likely to consume soft drinks if they also consumed hot chips (40 % v. 17 %, P < 0·001).
Only one-third of children consumed vegetables (excluding potato/kumara/taro) in the evening. Ethnicity was a strong determinant of vegetable consumption (NZEO 43 %, Maori 33 %, Pacific 24 %, P < 0·001). If potato/kumara/taro was included in this category (vegetables/potato) then the prevalence of consumption was 45 % and the effect of ethnicity was not significant. There was no association between vegetable consumption and other covariates. Children were more likely to consume vegetables if they also consumed potato/kumara/taro (71 % v. 16 %, P < 0·001) or meat (any of poultry, beef, pork, lamb/mutton, sausage/processed meats; 45 % v. 17 %, P < 0·001). Children were less likely to consume vegetables during the evening if they consumed hot chips (21 % v. 35 %, P < 0·001) or soft drinks (27 % v. 34 %, P = 0·005). There was no effect of grains/pasta consumption on the likelihood of consuming vegetables.
Discussion
Previous papers from the CNS02 have reported the proportion of energy obtained before 09.00 hours (16 %)(Reference Wilson, Parnell and Wohlers2), between 09.00 and 11.59 hours (11 %) and between 12.00 and 13.59 hours (20 %)(Reference Regan, Parnell and Gray3), demonstrating that intake after 14.00 hours exceeds 50 % of daily intake. Therefore documenting what is consumed during the afternoon and evening is essential to a full understanding of the daily patterns of NZ children's food choices and nutrient intakes.
It is encouraging that the most frequently consumed food group during the afternoon is fruit. While foods eaten during the afternoon are indeed carbohydrate-rich (e.g. fruit, biscuits/crackers, bread, sandwiches), they do include some treat foods and provide a mean intake of ∼1300 kJ. Afternoon eating does not appear to reduce food/beverage intakes at other times of the day, as children who consumed something during the afternoon had 16 % higher daily energy intake than children who did not eat during the afternoon (adjusted for all covariates).
The contribution of evening eating to nutrient intakes reflects the types of foods eaten during that period. Evening eating appears to contain more meat than other time periods, and children appear to consume fewer grain products and carbohydrate-rich foods compared with the rest of the day(Reference Wilson, Parnell and Wohlers2, Reference Regan, Parnell and Gray3). Thus evening eating provides relatively more protein, fat, cholesterol, Fe and Zn than carbohydrate, folate and thiamin, relative to its contribution to daily energy intake.
The distribution of energy intake during the day changes with age. Not only do older children (11–14 years) have a larger proportion of their daily energy intake during the evening than younger children, they are also less likely to consume something during the afternoon. It has previously been shown that older children are less likely to have breakfast(Reference Wilson, Parnell and Wohlers2) or to consume foods/beverages during school hours(Reference Regan, Parnell and Gray3). This pattern results in a disproportionate amount of the day's food being consumed during the evening, with the need for food in that time period to be nutritionally sound if daily recommendations are to be met.
To ensure appropriate fat composition of children's diets, it is recommended that children eat fried foods only occasionally(4, Reference Wall and Colbert11). Seventeen per cent of children consumed hot chips during the evening and this was associated with less desirable eating habits: children consuming hot chips were nearly half as likely to consume vegetables and 3·25 times more likely to consume soft drinks.
The NZ Ministry of Health Guidelines recommend that school-aged children have at least three servings of vegetables daily(4, Reference Wall and Colbert11), but the Dietary Habits section of the CNS02 Survey Report(Reference Parnell, Scragg and Wilson1) notes that this was achieved by only 57 % of children. The evening meal is the most practical time for eating vegetables and vegetable consumption is low at other times(Reference Wilson, Parnell and Wohlers2, Reference Regan, Parnell and Gray3). The low proportion of evening vegetable consumers (33 %, or 45 % for vegetables/potato) is of concern, and contributes to the high prevalence of inadequate vitamin A intakes of Maori/Pacific children(Reference Parnell, Scragg and Wilson1). Vegetable consumption may be underestimated because some are present in meat or grain/pasta dishes; however, children consuming meat or potato/kumara/taro were more likely to also consume vegetables, but consumption of grains/pasta had no relationship with vegetable consumption.
The survey does not identify the causes of low vegetable consumption. In other studies vegetable consumption has been associated with children's preferences(Reference Wind, de Bourdeaudhuij and te Velde12), parental consumption, socio-economic status(Reference Vejrup, Lien and Klepp13) and the frequency of eating together as a family(Reference Larson, Neumark-Sztainer and Hannan14, Reference Utter, Scragg and Schaaf15). The high proportion of hot chips consumption may reflect children's and/or parents’ preferences, time constraints of meal preparation and cost.
In conclusion, foods consumed during the afternoon are mostly carbohydrate-rich and contribute significantly to NZ children's daily nutrient intakes; fruit is the most popular choice. However, food choices during the evening and the notably low vegetable consumption indicate that improvement is needed. Since vegetables are consumed more often by those eating meat and potato/kumara/taro rather than by those eating hot chips, it appears that a practical and affordable way to maximize vegetable consumption is to include it in the context of a traditional meat, potato and vegetable combination. There is a need to find practical and affordable ways for families, especially those with older children, to include vegetables in lunches, snacks and particularly evening meals.
Acknowledgements
The Children's Nutrition Survey 2002 (CNS02) was funded by the NZ Ministry of Health. The authors have no conflicts of interest. W.R.P. and N.W. were both principal investigators on the CNS02 and conceived the original idea for the present analysis. J.E.R. and P.M.L.S. managed data. J.E.R. conducted relevant literature searches, statistical analyses and drafted the initial and final manuscripts. P.M.L.S., W.R.P. and N.W. provided detailed critical review. The authors thank all CNS02 participants and Andrew Gray, University of Otago, for his advice on statistical methodology. Other principal investigators of the CNS02 came from Auckland University (David Schaaf, Robert Scragg) and Massey University (Eljon Fitzgerald).
