Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T01:55:09.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mobile health monitoring of children with CHDs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2024

Megan E. LeBlanc*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Sarah Tallent
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Christoph P. Hornik
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Michael G.W. Camitta
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Anne C. Schmelzer
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA Department of Neonatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Lillian Kang
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Kevin D. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
*
Corresponding author: Megan E. LeBlanc; Email: Megan.leblanc@duke.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Mobile health has been shown to improve quality, access, and efficiency of health care in select populations. We sought to evaluate the benefits of mobile health monitoring using the KidsHeart app in an infant CHD population.

Methods:

We reviewed data submitted to KidsHeart from parents of infants discharged following intervention for high-risk CHD lesions including subjects status post stage 1 single ventricle palliation, ductal stent or surgical shunt, pulmonary artery band, or right ventricular outflow tract stent. We report on the benefits of a novel mobile health red flag scoring system, mobile health growth/feed tracking, and longitudinal neurodevelopmental outcomes tracking.

Results:

A total of 69 CHD subjects (63% male, 41% non-white, median age 28 days [interquartile range 20, 75 days]) were included with median mobile health follow-up of 137 days (56, 190). During the analytic window, subjects submitted 5700 mobile health red flag notifications including 245 violations (mean [standard deviation] 3 ± 3.96 per participant) with 80% (55/69) of subjects submitting at least one violation. Violations precipitated 116 interventions including hospital admission in 34 (29%) with trans-catheter evaluation in 15 (13%) of those. Growth data (n = 2543 daily weights) were submitted by 63/69 (91%) subjects and precipitated 31 feed changes in 23 participants. Sixty-eight percent of subjects with age >2 months submitted at least one complete neurodevelopment questionnaire.

Conclusion:

In our initial experience, mobile health monitoring using the KidsHeart app enhanced interstage monitoring permitting earlier intervention, allowed for remote tracking of growth feeding, and provided a means for tracking longitudinal neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Images of KidsHeart app interface.

Figure 1

Table 1. Red flag scoring system

Figure 2

Table 2. Demographics

Figure 3

Figure 2. Number of red flag surveys submitted by participants.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Percent of patients in cohort undergoing intervention by type. (For the purposes of this figure, admissions and admissions with interventions represent mutually exclusive groups; thereby, any admission with a trans-catheter intervention is not also represented within the admission group).

Supplementary material: File

LeBlanc et al. supplementary material 1

LeBlanc et al. supplementary material
Download LeBlanc et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 120.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

LeBlanc et al. supplementary material 2

LeBlanc et al. supplementary material
Download LeBlanc et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 1.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

LeBlanc et al. supplementary material 3

LeBlanc et al. supplementary material
Download LeBlanc et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 1.6 MB