Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T17:04:00.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economics of decriminalizing mental illness: when doing the right thing costs less

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2020

Darci Delgado*
Affiliation:
California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California, USA
Ashley Breth
Affiliation:
California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California, USA
Shelley Hill
Affiliation:
California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California, USA University of California, Davis, California, USA
Katherine Warburton
Affiliation:
California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California, USA University of California, Davis, California, USA
Stephen M. Stahl
Affiliation:
California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California, USA University of California, San Diego, California, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: Darci Delgado (Email: darci.delgado@dsh.ca.gov)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The United States’ criminal justice system has seen exponential growth in costs related to the incarceration of persons with mental illness. Jails, prisons, and state hospitals’ resources are insufficient to adequately treat the sheer number of individuals cycling through their system. Reversing the cycle of criminalization of mental illness is a complicated process, but mental health diversion programs across the nation are uniquely positioned to do just that. Not only are these programs providing humane treatment to individuals within the community and breaking the cycle of recidivism, the potential fiscal savings are over 1 billion dollars.

Information

Type
Perspectives
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020
Figure 0

FIGURE 1. Cycle of the criminal justice system for a person with mental illness.

Figure 1

TABLE 1. Cost of treatment per person per year.

Figure 2

FIGURE 2. Example of estimated cost of one individual’s journey through the criminal justice system.

Figure 3

FIGURE 3. Sequential Intercept Model.8

Figure 4

FIGURE 4. Prospective cost differences in 1 year of utilizing mental health diversion for 1 individual.

Figure 5

FIGURE 5. Prospective cost differences of state hospital treatment versus community diversion treatment.