Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T04:09:05.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in Eocene plant diversity and composition of vegetation: the lacustrine archive of Messel (Germany)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2018

Olaf K. Lenz
Affiliation:
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, General Directorate, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany, and Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Applied Sedimentology, Schnittspahnstrasse 9, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany. E-mail: olaf.lenz@senckenberg.de
Volker Wilde
Affiliation:
Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum, Palaeontology and Historical Geology, Section of Palaeobotany, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E-mail: volker.wilde28e@senckenberg.de

Abstract

Based on high-resolution palynological analysis of 680 samples from a core, short-term changes in plant diversity and floristic composition within the Paleogene greenhouse were detected in the lacustrine succession of a lower to middle Eocene maar lake at Messel (Federal State of Hesse, Germany). The microfloristic data show that taxonomic diversity increased rapidly within some decades during recolonization of a volcanically devastated area around the lake. With the establishment of a climax vegetation at the end of recolonization, the maximum in palynological diversity was reached within the crater area. During the following 640 Kyr the composition of the palynospectrum changed only gradually. However, different richness and evenness estimations show that alpha and gamma diversity decreased up to 35%, which can be related to the establishment of an equilibrium stage within the climax vegetation that led to the dominance of an assemblage of self-replacing species. Nevertheless, time-series analysis of alpha-diversity changes within the climax vegetation reveals that orbitally controlled climate change of Milankovitch and sub-Milankovitch order influenced the diversity of the vegetation, resulting in a rise of beta diversity. Based on the composition of the vegetation and comparison to modern analogues, our analysis proves that Eocene paratropical plant diversity increased during periods of slightly higher temperature and precipitation. Therefore, both composition and diversity of the vegetation was highly susceptible to minor-scale, short-term changes in climate, even during equable greenhouse conditions.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2018 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Simplified geological situation of the Sprendlinger Horst (modified after Harms et al. 1999; Lenz et al. 2017).

Figure 1

Figure 2 A, Generalized section of core Messel 2001 (after Felder and Harms 2004) showing the subdivision of the lacustrine succession of the maar lake of Messel in 10 different vegetation phases (based on analyses of Lenz et al. 2007, 2011). The Ypresian/Lutetian boundary is between 30 and 59 m core depth (see Lenz et al. 2015). EILP, early initial lake phase; LILP, late initial lake phase. B, Stratigraphic position of the Lower and Middle Messel Formation (MMF), including comparison of the Messel Formation related to the magnetostratigraphic (GPTS, global polarity timescale) and biochronologic (ELMA, European land mammal age) timescales; after Mertz and Renne (2005); the age of the Messel basalt is taken from Lenz et al. (2015). C, Laminated oil shale of the Middle Messel Formation showing an annual stratification of alternating light and dark layers. The light, organic-rich layers are characterized by a predominance of remains of the green alga Tetraedron minimum. The detail in the lower right corner presents an individual cell case of T. minimum, showing the typical reticulate sculpture.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Overall pollen diagram of 715 samples from core Messel 2001 between 1.09 and 229 m depth. The subdivision of the diagram is based on Lenz et al. (2007, 2011). For statistical analyses, 680 samples from early initial lake phase (EILP), late initial lake phase (LILP), and Middle Messel Formation (MMF) zones were used. The 35 samples from the event bed were excluded because of redeposition.

Figure 3

Table 1 Estimations of richness and evenness using sample-based incidence data for the 10 vegetation phases of the Lower Messel Formation (EILP, LILP) and Middle Messel Formation (MMF). Sobs, actual number of taxa within the samples; S(est)100, expected number of species in 100 samples using the Bernoulli product model (Colwell et al. 2012); S(est)100 95% CI, lower and upper bounds of 95% confidence interval for S(est); *S(est) and S(est) 95% CI in 75 samples; **S(est) and S(est) 95% CI in 63 samples; ***S(est) and S(est) 95% CI in 39 samples; singletons, no. of species that occur only once in all samples; doubletons, no. of species that occur only twice in all samples; uniques, no. of species that occur in only one sample; duplicates, no. of species that occur in only two samples; E, evenness calculation using the method of Keen et al. (2014): E=Shannon-Winter index/ln(Sobs).

Figure 4

Figure 4 Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of palynological data of 680 samples from the lacustrine succession of the Messel maar lake using the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and the Wisconsin double standardized raw data values. A, Scatter plot of the first two axes showing the arrangement of samples. The different symbols represent samples from the 10 different vegetation phases. The numbers indicate the median NMDS scores of the different vegetation phases. B, Position of the 10 vegetation phases based on median NMDS scores in the ordination space. The black line indicates a gradual but continuous vegetation change from early initial lake phase 1 (EILP1) to Middle Messel Formation 6 (MMF6). LILP, late initial lake phase. C, Scatter plot of the first two axes showing the arrangement of taxa. The dots represent the different samples (see A).

Figure 5

Figure 5 Scores on (A) non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) axis 1 and (B) NMDS axis 2 for 54 pollen taxa counted over the 10 vegetational phases of Lake Messel.

Figure 6

Figure 6 A, Rarefied within-sample richness (alpha diversity) at 200 counted individual palynomorphs for 680 samples from Lake Messel. The black line represents the five-sample moving average. EILP, early initial lake phase; LILP, late initial lake phase; MMF, Middle Messel Formation. B, Box-and-whisker plot of rarefied within-sample richness (alpha diversity) at 200 counted individual palynomorphs for the 10 vegetation phases of Lake Messel. The box represents the 25%–75% quartiles with the median with a horizontal line inside the box. The median values are behind the boxes. The whiskers are drawn from the top of the box up to the largest data value that is less than 1.5 times the box height from the box, and similarly below the box. Outliers are presented with circles. The numbers (n) in the upper line represent the number of samples used for calculating each of the plots. C, Bar chart of beta diversity calculated for the 10 vegetation phases using the measure of Whittaker (1960, 1972): (S/ā ) – 1; S, total number of species in a vegetation phase, ā, average number of species in a sample of the specific vegetation phase. D, Bar chart with evenness values for the 10 vegetation phases. The calculation is based on species richness estimations and the Shannon-Wiener index (see Table 1).

Figure 7

Figure 7 Sample-based interpolation (rarefaction) and extrapolation using the Bernoulli product model (Colwell et al. 2012) for the 10 vegetation phases of the Lower (LMF) and Middle (MMF) Messel Formation with 95% unconditional confidence intervals: A, early initial lake phase 1 (EILP1), 66 samples; B, EILP2, 26 samples; C, late initial lake phase (LILP1) 1, 21 samples; D, LILP2, 49 samples; E, MMF1, 104 samples; F, MMF2, 41 samples; G, MMF3, 163 samples; H, MMF4, 164 samples; I, MMF5, 13 samples; J, MMF6, 33 samples. K, Comparison of the curves from the 10 lake phases of the LMF and MMF. For clarity, the 95% confidence intervals are omitted. Because of differences in the number of counted individuals per sample, the sample-based rarefaction curves and their confidence intervals are replotted against an x-axis of individual abundance. Sobs, number of observed species.

Figure 8

Figure 8 Time-series analyses of within-sample richness (alpha diversity) at 200 counted individual palynomorphs for 680 samples from core Messel 2001 between 3.08 and 94.60m core depth. A, Time-series data. B, REDFIT analyses of alpha-diversity values. Significant peaks passing the 99% (upper line) or 95% (lower line) Monte Carlo–corrected confidence interval are indicated by frequency and periodicity values. C, Continuous wavelet time–frequency spectra (Morlet wavelets) of alpha-diversity values. To reduce wraparound effects, the time series are padded with zeros. Therefore, the cone of influence indicates the region where boundary effects are present. Bold contours correspond to power that is significant at 95% confidence level. Significant periods are marked by numbers. The numbers point to the respective significant cycles of the REDFIT periodogram.

Figure 9

Figure 9 Comparison of precession and eccentricity band-pass-filtered amplitude modulations (AMs) of percentage graphs of five palynomorph clusters from the MMF (taken from Lenz et al. 2017) with the respective AMs of within-sample richness (alpha diversity). The records are filtered with a band-pass FIR (finite impulse response) filter centered at 0.065 ± 0.005 cycle/1.4 Kyr, corresponding to periods of 20–23.33 Kyr, for precession (A), and a low-pass FIR filter between 0 and 0.014 cycle/1.4 Kyr, corresponding to periods of >100 Kyr for eccentricity (B) using PAST (Hammer et al. 2001). The negative deflections of 5 eccentricity cycles (e1 – e5) and 30 precession cycles (p1 – p30) are indicated. Clusters A, B, C, D are almost in-phase with alpha diversity, whereas cluster E is in antiphase. Phase wheels for (C) eccentricity and (D) precession present the phase angle of every cycle between the palynomorph clusters and alpha diversity. Zero phase on each wheel is set at minimum eccentricity or precession for alpha diversity. Angular distances from zero correspond to the measured phase differences. Negative or positive phase angles represent the timing of proxy minima relative to the zero point. Positive angles on the left side of the wheel represent cycles in advance of the pollen signal compared with the respective cycle from alpha diversity; a negative angle on the right side represents a lag.