Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:49:36.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of fenestration on long-term Fontan survival

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2021

Ondřej Materna*
Affiliation:
Children’s Heart Centre, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Vojtěch Illinger
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Denisa Jičínská
Affiliation:
Children’s Heart Centre, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Karel Koubský
Affiliation:
Children’s Heart Centre, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Jan Kovanda
Affiliation:
Children’s Heart Centre, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Miroslav Ložek
Affiliation:
Children’s Heart Centre, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Petr Tax
Affiliation:
Children’s Heart Centre, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Oleg Reich
Affiliation:
Children’s Heart Centre, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Václav Chaloupecký
Affiliation:
Children’s Heart Centre, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Jan Janoušek
Affiliation:
Children’s Heart Centre, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author for correspondence: O. Materna, MD, Children’s Heart Centre, Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic. Tell: +420224432991; Fax: +420224432920 E-mail: ondrej.materna@fnmotol.cz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Fenestration in the total cavopulmonary connection system may improve the outcome of patients with significant risk factors for Fontan haemodynamics. Our study aims to analyse the difference in long-term survival between non-fenestrated and fenestrated patients.

Methods:

All consecutive patients (n = 351) who underwent total cavopulmonary connection between 1992 and 2016 were identified. Six early deaths were excluded resulting in a group of 345 patients. Median (interquartile range,) length of follow-up was 14.4 (7.1–19.7) years. Freedom from the composite endpoint of death, total cavopulmonary connection take-down or indication for a heart transplant was analysed.

Results:

Fenestration was absent in 237 patients (68.7%, Group 1), was created and closed later in 79 patients (22.9%, Group 2), and remained open in 29 patients (8.4%, Group 3). Mean survival probability until composite endpoint was 97.1 and 92.9% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. Patients with patent fenestration had worse survival (p < 0.001) as compared to both the non-fenestrated and fenestration closure groups. Despite a similar outcome, exercise capacity was lower in Group 2 than 1 (p = 0.013). In 58 patients with interventional fenestration closure, Nakata index was lower at the time of closure than pre-operatively, and both the pressure in the circuit and oxygen saturation in the aorta increased significantly (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Patients with persisting risk factors preventing fenestration closure are at higher risk of reaching the composite endpoint. Patients after fenestration closure have the worse functional outcome; their survival is, however, not different from the non-fenestrated group.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Group characteristics. TCPC – total cavopulmonary connection, IQR – interquartile range, WU – Wood units, VO2peak – peak oxygen uptake, SaO2 – arterial oxygen haemoglobin saturation. *, +, # p < 0.05, $ p = 0.013

Figure 1

Figure 1. Survival probability until composite endpoint. Group 1 – non-fenestrated. Group 2 – fenestration closed. Group 3 – fenestration open.

Figure 2

Table 2. Long-term survival according to the presence and fate of fenestration

Figure 3

Table 3. Differences in characteristics between patients reaching composite endpoint and the rest of patients. TCPC – total cavopulmonary connection, IQR – interquartile range, WU – Wood units, VO2peak – peak oxygen uptake. SaO2 – arterial oxygen haemoglobin saturation

Figure 4

Figure 2. Freedom from fenestration closure.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Haemodynamic data before and after instrumental fenestration closure. (a) Total cavopulmonary connection system pressure. (b) Arterial haemoglobin oxygen saturation. (c) Pressure in the total cavopulmonary connection system in Group 2 and Group 3. (d) Indexed systemic blood flow (Qs) in Group 2 and Group 3.