Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:47:19.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy dissipation of ion beam in two-component plasma in the presence of laser irradiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2011

Zhang-Hu Hu
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Optoelectronic Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
Yuan-Hong Song
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Optoelectronic Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
Z.L. Mišković
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
You-Nian Wang*
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Optoelectronic Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: You-Nian Wang, School of Physics and Optoelectronic Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China116024. E-mail: ynwang@dlut.edu.cn

Abstract

We use a two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulation to investigate the dynamic polarization and stopping power for an ion beam propagating through a two-component plasma, which is simultaneously irradiated by a strong laser pulse. Compared to the laser-free case, we observe a reduction in the instantaneous stopping power that initially follows the shape of the laser pulse and becomes particularly large as the laser frequency approaches the plasma electron frequency. We attribute this large reduction in the ion stopping power to an increase in plasma temperature due to the energy absorbed in the plasma from the laser pulse through the process of wave heating. In addition, dynamic polarization of the plasma by the ion is found to be strongly modulated by the laser field.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (Color online) The effects of (a) different laser frequencies and (b) different peak intensities on the temporal evolution of the ion kinetic energy. The peak laser intensity I0 in panel (a) is set to be 5 × 1013 W/cm2 and the laser frequency ω0 in panel (b) is set to be 1.03ωpe, with ${\rm \omega}_{\,pe} = \sqrt {n_0 e^2 /\varepsilon_0 m_e}$ being the frequency of plasma electrons. Also the intensity I0 in panel (b) represents 5 × 1013 W/cm2.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (Color online) The effects of (a) different laser frequencies and (b) different peak intensities on the temporal evolution of the average plasma electron temperature Te. The other parameters are the same as those used in Figure 1.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (Color online) The effects of (a) different laser frequencies and (b) different peak intensities on the temporal evolution of the ion stopping power S, normalized by S0 = (Zpe)2/(4π2ɛ0λDe2), with Zp being the ion charge, ɛ0 the permittivity of free space, and $\lambda _{De} = \sqrt {\varepsilon_0 k_B T_e /n_0 e^2}$ the Debye length of the plasma electrons. The other parameters are the same as those used in Figure 1.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (Color online) The perturbed density (normalized by n0) and the velocity fields of plasma electrons for three different cases: (1) plasma interacting with the ion only [panels (a) and (b)], (2) plasma interacting with the laser only [panels (c) and (d)], and (3) plasma interacting with both the ion and the laser field [panels (e) and (f)]. The initial ion energy in cases (1) and (3) is set to be 2.06 MeV/u, while the laser frequency ω0 and the laser peak intensity in the cases (2) and (3) are set to be 1.03ωpe and 5 × 1013 W/cm2, respectively.