Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T06:13:09.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Habitat visualization, acquisition features and necessity of the gammaproteobacterial symbiont of pistachio stink Bug, Acrosternum heegeri (Hem.: Pentatomidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2019

M. Kashkouli
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O.Box 14115-336, Tehran, Iran
Y. Fathipour*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O.Box 14115-336, Tehran, Iran
M. Mehrabadi
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O.Box 14115-336, Tehran, Iran
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +98 21 48292301 Fax: +98 21 48292200 E-mail: fathi@modares.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plant-sucking stinkbugs are especially associated with mutualistic gut bacterial symbionts. Here, we explored the symbiotic relationship of a pistachio stinkbug, Acrosternum heegeri Fieber by histological, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), real-time PCR and molecular phylogenetic techniques. Furthermore, the effects of the symbiont on the resting/wandering behaviors of the newborn nymphs, pre-adult survival rates, and stage compositions were investigated. Transmission electron microscopy and real-time PCR analyses showed that a rod-shaped gammaproteobacterium was persistently located within the posterior midgut crypts. Molecular phylogenetic and FISH techniques strongly suggested that this symbiont should be placed in the genus Pantoea of the Enterobacteriales. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the presence of the bacterial cells on the egg surface which the surface sterilization of the eggs resulted in the successful removal of the symbiont from the eggs. Symbiotic and aposymbiotic A. heegeri showed no significant differences in the wandering behaviors of the first nymphal stages, while the symbiont-free insects suffered retarded growth and lower survivability. Together, the results highlight the habitat and acquisition features of Pantoea symbiont and its contribution in A. heegeri biology that might help us for better pest management in the future.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 
Figure 0

Table 1. PCR and qPCR primers used in the present study.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Micrographs from Acrosternum heegeri digestive tract. (a) Alimentary canal of A. heegeri (b) Longitudinal section from whole digestive tract with different midgut regions and rectum. V1-V4: midgut regions; Mt: Malpighian tubules; Re: Rectum.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Micrographs from the fourth midgut region of A. heegeri. Light micrographs: (a) Longitudinal section of the fourth ventricle showing a crypt with symbiont bacteria into the lumen and epithelial cells. (b) More detailed portion of part A (c) Transmission electron micrographs of A. heegeri showing longitudinal and transversal sections of the bacterial symbiont found in the lumen of the midgut fourth ventricle. EP: columnar epithelium; SB: symbiont bacteria; IM: inner and OM: outer symbiont cell membranes.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Egg mass and scanning electron micrographs of the egg surface of A. heegeri. (a) An egg clutch. (b) An enlarged image of an egg crushed using a combination of vigorous vortexing and manual crushing. (c) A number of symbiont cells (arrows) on the egg surface.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Relative frequency of different bacterial groups along the midgut regions, egg, and ovary of A. heegeri. (a) The extracted DNAs were subjected to qPCR by using a pair of universal primers as well as taxon-specific primers, γ-Proteobacteria. The V4 region showed the most quantity of Eubacteria and Gammaproteobacteria. (b) The occurrence of the major phylogenetic groups of bacteria including α-Proteobacteria, β-Proteobacteria, γ-Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Acidobacteria were examined in the insect body parts (V1, V4, ovary) and egg by using taxon-specific primers. For each bacterial taxon, means followed by different letters are significantly different according to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P < 0.05).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the A. heegeri bacterial symbiont and representatives in the γ-Proteobacteria. The trees were reconstructed based on (a) 16S rRNA gene sequences, and (b) and GroEl protein sequences. Maximum likelihood trees inferred from the results for a total of 1151 and 286 aligned nucleotide sites are shown for 16S rRNA and groEL sequences, respectively, while other trees exhibited substantially the same topologies. On each of the nodes, bootstrap probabilities determined in the maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses, and posterior probabilities determined in the Bayesian analysis are shown in that order. Asterisks indicate bootstrap values lower than 50%. Sequence accession numbers were shown in brackets and the taxonomic affiliations were mentioned in parentheses. The AT contents of the nucleotide sequences were also indicated.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting 16S rRNA of the symbiont in V4. (a) Light micrograph, (b) Bright field observation, (c) Red Pantoea stained with CY5-conjugated Pantoea-specific, Texas red filter. (d) Violet indicates the combination of signals of the CY5-conjugated Pantoea-specific probe and blue signals show host insect nuclei stained with DAPI.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. qPCR analyses for bacterial symbiont intensities in the control and surface sterilized eggs. To eliminate the bacterial symbiont, the egg masses were treated with bleach, 12% NaOCl and 96% ethanol. The egg surface sterilization reduced the density of bacterial symbiont in the sterilized eggs 20.35 folds lower than that of the control.***: significant difference between the control and the aposymbiont insects (independent-samples t-test).

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Wandering behavior of newborn nymphs in the symbiotic and aposymbiotic isolines of A. heegeri. (a) newly hatched nymphs aggregate around the eggshell, (b) Mean number (±SE) of wandering nymphs per egg mass within 3, 12, 24 and 48 h post-hatching. The n.s. indicates no significant differences between the control and the aposymbiont insects (independent-samples t-test).

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Impact of bacterial symbiont elimination on the insect host fitness. (a) Survival rates of nymphal stages in symbiont and aposymbiont A. heegeri sibling populations. The number of survived nymphs is presented on each column. (b–c) Growth profiles of symbiotic (b) and aposymbiotic insects (c). Fisher's exact probability test: n. s., not significant,*: P < 0.05 and***: P ≤ 0.001.