Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T13:49:23.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Summer–winter transitions in Antarctic ponds I: The physical environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

Ian Hawes*
Affiliation:
Gateway Antarctica, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
Karl Safi
Affiliation:
NIWA Ltd, PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand
Brian Sorrell
Affiliation:
Dept of Biological Sciences, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus 3, Denmark
Jenny Webster-Brown
Affiliation:
Waterways, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
David Arscott
Affiliation:
Stroud Water Research Center, Avondale, PA 19311, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Meltwater ponds are one of the most widespread aquatic habitats in ice-free areas of continental Antarctica. While most studies of such systems occur during the Antarctic summer, here we report on ice formation and water column attributes in four meltwater ponds on the McMurdo Ice Shelf during autumn, when they went from ice-free to > 80 cm thickness of ice. Ice thickness grew at an average rate of 1.5 cm d-1 in all ponds and as ice formed, salts and gases were excluded. This resulted in conductivity rising from 3–5 to > 60 mS cm-1 and contributed to the ebullition of gases. Incorporation of gas bubbles in the ice resulted in a high albedo and under-ice irradiance declined faster than incident, the former falling below 1 W m-2 (daily average) by early April. After two months of ice formation, only 0–15% of the volume of each pond was still liquid, although this represented 5–35% of the pond sediment area, where much of the biological activity was concentrated. We suggest that the stresses that the freezing process imposes may be as important to structuring the biotic communities as those during the more benign summer growth period.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Location map of study area, to the south of Bratina Island on the McMurdo Ice Shelf. Ponds are shown in grey, with the main study ponds hatched.

Figure 1

Table I Physical properties of the four ponds used in this investigation.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Air temperature (hourly mean) and irradiance (daily mean) during the sampling period. All variables are sampled at 1 minute intervals.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Ice thickness at fixed locations in four ponds on the McMurdo Ice shelf during the study period.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Residual pond volume and sediment area in four ponds of the McMurdo Ice shelf. Estimates are from hypsographic curves, pond depth and ice thickness.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Temperature of ice/water at three depths in Legin pond. Air temperature is also shown. Records are hourly averages.

Figure 6

Fig. 6 Transmission of irradiance through the ice covers of four ponds on the McMurdo Ice Shelf during February–April 2008.

Figure 7

Fig. 7 Vertical profiles of specific conductivity and temperature one week after ice formation in three McMurdo Ice Shelf ponds.

Figure 8

Fig. 8 Development of vertical profiles of a. conductivity, and b. temperature during progressive freezing in the mixed JA pond (McMurdo Ice Shelf). Profiles are shorter as the ice thickens.

Figure 9

Fig. 9 Development of vertical profiles of a. conductivity, and b. temperature during progressive freezing in the stratified Legin pond (McMurdo Ice Shelf). Profiles are shorter as the ice thickens.

Figure 10

Fig. 10 The product of conductivity and volume during the freezing process in JA pond, (McMurdo Ice Shelf). Symbols mark actual samples while the line is a 3-sample running mean.