Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:14:42.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

K-Ar and Rb-Sr Dating of Nanometer-Sized Smectite-Rich Mixed Layers From Bentonite Beds of the Campos Basin (Rio De Janeiro State, Brazil)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Norbert Clauer*
Affiliation:
Institut de Physique du Globe de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg (UdS-CNRS), 1 Rue Blessig, 67084, Strasbourg, France
Jan Środoń
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-002, Kraków, Poland
Amélie Aubert
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d’Hydrologie et de Géochimie de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg (UdS-CNRS), 1 rue Blessig, 67084, Strasbourg, France
I. Tonguç Uysal
Affiliation:
Geological Engineering Department, Ankara University, Gölbaşı, Ankara, Turkey
Theofilos Toulkeridis
Affiliation:
Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Av. General Ruminahui, Sangolqui, Ecuador
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: nclauer@unistra.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

K-Ar isotopic dating has been applied to alkali-rich nanometer-sized illite separates of bentonites since the late 1990s. In the present study, K-Ar and Rb-Sr isotopic analyses were based on mineralogical determinations and morphological observations of similarly nm-sized separates (<0.02, 0.02–0.05, and 0.05–0.1 μm) depleted in alkalis and recovered from Santonian (85.8–83.5 Ma) bentonites of the Campos Basin located offshore the southeastern Atlantic coast (Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil). On the basis of XRD analyses and geochemical/mineralogical simulations, the size fractions consist essentially of the smectite-rich end-member of the smectite-to-illite trend with no more than 9% authigenic illite layers. High K-Ar values from 42.6 ± 3.2 to 70.2 ± 2.1 Ma confirm the occurrence of detrital illite in one sample at least, the age data being meaningless. A second group of K-Ar values ranges from 15.5 ± 10.7 to 41.3 ± 10.8 Ma, while the smallest (<0.02 and 0.02–0.05 μm) fractions with <0.42% K2O lack detectable radiogenic 40Ar and yield analytically 0 Ma ages. Two samples including that with the detrital illite were leached with dilute acid and the Rb-Sr method was applied to the untreated, leachate, and residual fractions of the different separates. The combined isotopic data suggest that illitization started at ~44 ± 4 Ma when the bentonites were subjected to a temperature of ~60°C. The leachable Sr yielded 87Sr/86Sr ratios of 0.7106–0.7108, which is greater than those of seawater either during deposition or recently, and of the initial ashes. They do not correspond to the chemical signature of pore fluids, but more likely to removals from fragile edges of the illite-smectite layers probably impacted by the rough initial chemical treatment applied to empty the smectite interlayers. Illitization was either a side effect of a major contemporaneous smectitization or an independent process that occurred later, in the progressively buried bentonite beds. Of variable duration, it was probably dependent on burial-induced temperature increase in the bentonites, which monitored the fixation of K in the smectite layering with or without a changing fluid chemistry. On the basis of the combined K-Ar and Rb-Sr isotopic data, illitization lasted either until ~15 Ma or even 0 Ma for some of the finest size fractions.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2020
Figure 0

Table 1. XRD data of the <0.02, 0.02–0.05, and 0.05–0.1 μm size fractions of the six selected bentonite samples

Figure 1

Table 2. K-Ar data of the <0.02, 0.02–0.05, 0.05–0.1, and 0.1–0.2 μm size fractions of the six bentonite samples

Figure 2

Table 3. Rb-Sr data of the untreated (Unt.), leachate (Leach.), and residue (Res.) separates from <0.02, 0.02–0.05, 0.05–0.1, and 0.1–0.2 μm size fractions of the samples A1 and B1

Figure 3

Fig. 1. a Map of the offshore southwestern margin of the South Atlantic Ocean on the Brazilian continental margin with the location of the Campos Basin; b sketch of the burial-depth curve of the volcano-sedimentary sequence. The layers of the studied bentonites are indicated by the arrows; and c a profile of the turbidite system along the offshore, again with the arrows marking the bentonite layers (the three sketches are reproduced, with the permission of the author, from Contreras 2011)

Figure 4

Fig. 2. XRD diagrams of the nm-sized <0.02, 0.02–0.05, and 0.1–0.2 μm size fractions of the A1 and B1 samples. The untreated air-dried separates are in red and the ethylene-glycolated separates are in blue

Figure 5

Fig. 3. SEM images of: a the bentonite sample A1 with some impacts of initial volcanic minerals; b sample A2 with authigenic illite-smectite crystals; c a closer look at a layer with very thin, irregular crystals relative to their surface; (d, e) TEM images showing very thin smectite crystals (apparently rolled in d)

Figure 6

Fig. 4. a A Harper (1970) diagram with the plots of the size fractions from A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, and B3 samples and b enlargement of the data from A2, A3, B1, B2, and B3 samples (those of sample A1 were not redrafted here)

Figure 7

Fig. 5. a A Harper (1970) diagram and b a more detailed plot of the same pattern with all analyzed size fractions of sample B1

Figure 8

Fig. 6. An isochron 40Ar/36Ar vs. 40K/36Ar plot of the different size fractions of the samples A1 and B1. Part b is an enlargement of part a

Figure 9

Fig. 7. A Rb-Sr data plot of the untreated, leachate, and residue separates of each size fraction of sample A1

Figure 10

Fig. 8. A Rb-Sr data plot of the untreated, leachate, and residue separates of each size fraction of sample B1