Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:30:14.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A planar microwave phase shifter using microstrip–CPW–microstrip transition with defected ground structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2015

Indhumathi Kulandhaisamy
Affiliation:
ECE Department, Anna University, Chennai, India. Phone: +919940453582
Malathi Kanagasabai
Affiliation:
ECE Department, Anna University, Chennai, India
Indira Gandhi Sannasi
Affiliation:
ECE Department, MIT, India
Srivastav ArunKumar*
Affiliation:
SAMEER-CEM, Chennai, India
Gulam Nabi Alsath
Affiliation:
ECE Department, SSN College of Engineering, India
*
Corresponding author: A. Srivastav Email: draks.chennai@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A novel planar printed phase shifter design is proposed in this paper. The design is developed with microstrip–conductor-backed coplanar waveguide– microstrip (MP–CBCPW–MP) transition line with different defected ground structures (DGS). The differential phase shift can be controlled by altering the DGS dimensions. Three prototypes with DGS dimensions 5 × 10, 10 × 20, and 10 × 30 mm2, are employed at the finite ground plane to achieve 5°, 20°, and 30° shift in phase respectively and are validated with the phase delay relation. The prominent effect of the transition region is to confine the field area. The resonance is at 700 MHz with a bandwidth of 400 MHz (0.4–0.8 GHz). The proposed phase shifter can be used for broadcasting applications. The proposed MP–CBCPW–MP transition phase shifter design with DGS is simulated, fabricated, and measured to analyze its performance.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Topology of the proposed model.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Equivalent circuit for the proposed phase shifter.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. MP–CPW–MP transition.

Figure 3

Table 1. Dimension chart for the proposed prototype.

Figure 4

Table 2. Performance comparison of proposed structures at 0.7 GHz.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. MP–CPW–MP transition with defected ground. (a) Front view of the proposed model. (b) Rear view of the proposed model with pair of rectangular DGS.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Equivalent circuit of rectangular DGS.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Parametric sweep on the dimension of DGS width.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Geometric analysis on single DGS dimension.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Analysis of phase shift with different dielectric constants. (a) Front view. (b) Rear view (DGS).

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Fabricated prototype model of MP–CPW–MP transition with DGS.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Simulated and measured results of S11 (dB) and S21 (dB) for the proposed MP–CPW–MP transition model without DGS.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Simulated and measured results of S11(dB) and S21(dB) for the proposed MP–CPW–MP transition model with 5 × 10 mm2 DGS.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Simulated and measured results of S11 (dB) and S21 (dB) for the proposed MP–CPW–MP transition model with 10 × 20 mm2 DGS.

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Simulated and measured results of S11 (dB) and S21 (dB) for the proposed MP–CPW–MP transition model with 10 × 30 mm2 DGS.

Figure 15

Fig. 14. Simulated and measured S21 (degree) for the proposed prototype with (a) no DGS, (b) 5 × 10 mm2 DGS, (c) 10 × 20 mm2 DGS, and (d) 10 × 30 mm2 DGS.