Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:49:23.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanism of salt-inhibited early seed germination analysed by transcriptomic sequencing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2019

Kaiwen Xia
Affiliation:
Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China
Aili Liu
Affiliation:
Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China
Yizhong Wang
Affiliation:
Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China
Wannian Yang
Affiliation:
Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China
Ye Jin*
Affiliation:
Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China
*
Author for correspondence: Ye Jin, Email: jinye@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed germination, the first and critical step of the plant's life cycle, is affected by salt stress. However, the underlying mechanism of salt tolerance during early seed germination remains elusive. Here, a comparative RNA-seq analysis was performed using early germinating seeds either under normal conditions or in 100 and 150 mM sodium chloride. A total of 575 genes were up-regulated and 913 genes were down-regulated in the presence of 100 mM NaCl. Under the 150 mM NaCl treatment 1921 genes were up-regulated and 3501 genes were down-regulated. A total of 379 or 863 genes were up-regulated or down-regulated in both 100 and 150mM NaCl. These co-regulated genes were further analysed by GO enrichment. Genes in the categories abscisic acid signaling and synthesis and nutrient reservoir activity were significantly enriched in the up-regulated genes. Transcription factors responsive to gibberellin and auxin were significantly down-regulated by salinity stress. Genes related to anti-oxidant activity were significantly enriched in the down-regulated gene clusters by NaCl treatment. Our results suggest that salt stress inhibits seed germination by activating ABA synthesis and signalling, and depressing GA and auxin signalling, while preserving nutrition and down-regulated anti-oxidant activity. Our study provides more insight into the molecular mechanism of salt tolerance during early seed germination.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Time course of seed germination in different concentrations of NaCl. Each value shown represents the mean ± SE of nine biological replicates.

Figure 1

Table 1. Summary of mRNA sequencing database

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Venn diagram of significantly differentially expressed genes between 100U, 100D, 150U and 150D. 100U and 150U: up-regulated genes in 100 and 150 mM NaCl, respectively; 100D and 150D: down-regulated genes in 100 and 150 mM NaCl, respectively.

Figure 3

Table 2. Genes differentially expressed in response to NaCl stress annotated with COG, GO, KEGG, KOG, NR and Swiss-Prot database

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the up-regulated genes in 100 and 150 mM NaCl. (A) Significantly enriched biological process GO terms for the co-upregulated genes. (B) Enrichment of significant molecular function of the co-upregulated genes. Enrichment was calculated by: (annotated/total number in query list)/(annotated/total number in background or reference).

Figure 5

Table 3. Summary of the up-regulated nutrient-reservoir related genes

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Genes response to Abscisic acid stimulus were up-regulated by sodium chloride treatment. (A) Expression of ABI3 At2g40220 was up-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (B) Expression of ABI4 At2g40220 was up-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (C) Expression of ABI5 At2g36270 was up-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (D) Expression of ABI2 At5g57050 was up-regulated by 150 mM NaCl treatment. (E) Expression of AHG1 At5g51760 was up-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (F) Expression of NCED3 At3g14440 was up-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (G) Expression of NCED9 At1g78390 was up-regulated by 150 mM NaCl treatment. (H) Expression of NCED5 At1g30100 was up-regulated by 150 mM NaCl treatment. Each value is mean ± SE of three biological replicates.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. GO analysis of the genes down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl. (A) Significantly enriched biological process GO terms. (B) Enrichment of significant molecular function of the co-downregulated genes. The enrichment was calculated by: (annotated/total number in query list)/(annotated/total number in background or reference).

Figure 8

Fig. 6. MYB family transcriptional factor were down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM sodium chloride treatment. (A) Expression of MYB28 At5g61420 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (B) Expression of MYB4 At4g38620 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (C) Expression of MYB60 At1g08810 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (D) Expression of MYB6 At4g09460 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (E) Expression of MYB16 At5g15310 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (F) Expression of MYBR1 At5g67300 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (G) Expression of At1g74840 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150mM NaCl treatment. Each value is mean ± SE of three biological replicates.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. transcriptional factor involved in auxin signaling were down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM sodium chloride treatment. (A) Expression of IAA18 At1g51950 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (B) Expression of IAA19 At3g15540 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (C) Expression of BT1 At5g63160 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (D) Expression of BT2 At3g48360 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. Each value is mean ± SE of three biological replicates.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Genes response to antioxidant activity were down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM sodium chloride treatment. (A) Expression of At1g77490 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (B) Expression of At2g25080 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (C) Expression of At2g34060 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (D) Expression of At2g38380 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (E) Expression of At2g38390 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (F) Expression of At3g49120 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (G) Expression of At4g09010 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (H) Expression of At4g25100 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (I) Expression of At4g31870 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (J) Expression of At4g33420 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (K) Expression of At4g37520 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. (L) Expression of At5g64110 was down-regulated by both 100 and 150 mM NaCl treatment. Each value is mean ± SE of three biological replicates.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Accumulated H2O2 content as detected by DAB staining in 60-hour-old seedlings under salt stress. (A) Water control; (B) 100 mM NaCl; (C) 150 mM NaCl; (D) H2O2 content quantified with or without NaCl. Each value represents the mean ± SE of six biological replicates. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Supplementary material: File

Xia et al. supplementary material

Xia et al. supplementary material 1

Download Xia et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.2 MB