Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T23:09:40.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray powder diffraction refinement of PbTi(1−x)Fex O(3−δ) solid solution series

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2013

Hasitha Ganegoda*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and CSRRI, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois
James A. Kaduk
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and CSRRI, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois
Carlo U. Segre
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and CSRRI, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: hganegod@iit.edu

Abstract

A series of iron-doped lead titanate PbTi(1−x)Fex O(3−δ) samples in the x = 0–1 composition range was prepared using sol–gel synthesis at a calcination temperature of 700 °C. The room temperature CuKα powder diffraction data collected from x = 0, 0.005, 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.125, 0.15, 0.175, 0.2, and 0.3 samples were analyzed using the Rietveld method. Magnetoplumbite (PbFe12O19) secondary phase formation was observed at compositions x = 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, and 1. Fe-composition dependent decrease of tetragonal distortion has been observed. According to Vegard's law, the B-site iron solubility limit in the lead titanate host was found to be approximately 10 mol% (x = 0.1). Homogeneous distribution of dopants below the solubility limit was evidenced by the linear behavior of unit-cell parameters. The absence of a cubic phase and the persistence of distorted oxygen octahedra indicated the existence of ferroelectric properties even at the x = 0.3 composition. Beyond x = 0.3, the P4mm tetragonal model was determined to be invalid possibly because of oxygen defect driven structural changes, mainly tilting Fe-polyhedra.

Information

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2013 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (Color online) Diffraction pattern of PbTiO3 prepared using the sol–gel route. Diffraction peaks are indexed with a tetragonal P4mm crystal structure.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (Color online) Diffraction patterns of the PbTi(1−x)FexO(3−δ) solid solution series. The evolution of the diffraction peaks indicates loss of tetragonal splitting at x = 0.1. Samples with x ≥ 0.4 show diffraction peaks belonging to secondary phases, mainly PbFe12O19.

Figure 2

Table I. Rietveld refinement fit parameters, pseudo-Voight mixing ratios, and crystallite sizes of PbTi(1−x)FexO(3−δ) samples.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Elemental maps of PbTi(1−x)FexO(3−δ), x = 0.3 and x = 0.6 samples using the FeKα fluorescence line. Arrows indicate Fe-rich regions.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (Color online) Cell parameters obtained from Rietveld refinement of PTF XRD data at room temperature as a function of Fe concentration. (a) Unit-cell parameters a and c, (b) tetragonal distortion c/a, and (c) cell volume.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (Color online) As a function of Fe concentration: (a) the variation of strain in the (00l) (triangles), (hk0) (squares), and (111) (circles) planes; (b) the shortest B–O bond length (B–O2sh); (c) the offset in the z-direction between the B-site cation and oxygens in a, b faces (|B(z)–O1(z)|).

Figure 6

Table II. Structural parameters for PbTi(1−x)FexO(3−δ) samples obtained by Rietveld refinement. Space group P4mm.

Figure 7

Figure 6. (Color online) Isotropic displacement coefficients, Uiso, multiplied by 100 for Pb (circles), Ti/Fe (squares), and O (triangles) vs. Fe concentration.

Supplementary material: File

Ganegoda Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Ganegoda Supplementary Material(File)
File 4 MB