Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T01:06:35.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low profile multi-polarization diversity UWB antenna for body centric communications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2022

Malathi Kanagasabai
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering, Guindy, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India
Padmathilagam Sambandam*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering, Guindy, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India
Mohammed Gulam Nabi Alsath
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Kalavakkam, Chennai 603110, India
Vikneshwaran Murugesan
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering, Guindy, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India
Sandeepkumar Palaniswamy
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai 603203, India
Arunkumar Shrivastav
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Saveetha Engineering College, Thandalam, Chennai 600056, India
*
Author for correspondence: Padmathilagam Sambandam, E-mail: padmathilagam.s@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A low-profile multi-polarized MIMO ultra-wideband antenna suitable for body-centric communications is reported. MIMO configuration is achieved using the symmetric heptagonal monopole (SHM) antenna, a mirrored SHM antenna, an asymmetric ruby-shaped monopole (ARSM) antenna, and a mirrored ARSM antenna placed over the modified C-shaped ground plane (MCGP). The proposed antenna elements are designed to achieve resonance for the entire ultra-wideband frequency range. The SHM antenna is coupled with a co-planar waveguide to produce linear polarization. An ARSM antenna generates circular polarization utilizing an asymmetric geometry both in the radiator and a truncated ground plane. Both the SHM antenna and an ARSM antenna are aligned face-to-face over an MCGP plane and good isolation >15 dB is realized between the antenna elements. The gain and total efficiency for linear polarized and the circularly polarized antennas are 3.05–4.8 dBi/48–66% and from 2.8 to 5 dBic/52 to 70.5%, respectively. The specific absorption rate values are evaluated to understand their suitability for WBAN communications.

Information

Type
Biomedical Applications
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geometry of the proposed antenna. (a) Front view, (b) rear view, and (c) side view dimensions of proposed antenna are L = 38; W = 35; L1 = 2; L2 = 1.25; L3 = 6.2; L4 = 6.2; L5 = 13; L6 = 3.8; L7 = 3.5; L8 = 2.2; L9 = 6.5; L10 = 7; L11 = 3.4; L12 = 2; L13 = 1.5; L14 = 2.4; L15 = 10.2; L16 = 12.4; L17 = 8.9; L18 = 11.8; L19 = 2.5; L20 = 0.9; W1 = 10.2; W2 = 2.9; W3 = 5.3; W4 = 2; W5 = 1.4; W6 = 11.4; W7 = 6; W8 = 4; W9 = 8.5; W10 = 5; W11 = 13.3; W12 = 2; W13 = 1.4; W14 = 20.5; W15 = 6.9; W16 = 17.9; W17 = 6; D1 = 4.6; D2 = 5.8; D3 = 13.3; D4 = 19.5; D5 = 3.8; D6 = 1.3; D7 = 2.8; D8 = 10.3 (all dimensions are in mm).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Evolution of the CP antenna. (a) CP antenna 1, (b) CP antenna 2, (c) CP antenna 3, (d) CP antenna 4, (e) CP antenna 5.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) Simulated reflection characteristics of CP antenna. (b) Axial ratio bandwidth of CP antenna.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Evolution of the LP antenna. (a) LP antenna 1, (b) LP antenna 2, (c) LP antenna 3, (d) LP antenna 4, (e) LP antenna 5.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (a) Simulated reflection characteristics of LP antenna. (b) Axial ratio bandwidth of LP antenna.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Surface current distribution of the proposed antenna with different phase angles.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Proposed dual-polarized UWB antenna.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Simulated reflection and isolation characteristics of the dual-polarized UWB antenna.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Configuration of 2 × 2 multi-polarized MIMO antenna.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Simulated reflection characteristics of the 2 × 2 MIMO antenna.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Simulated isolation characteristics of the 2 × 2 MIMO antenna. (a) Antenna 1 with respect to antennas 2, 3, and 4. (b) Antenna 2 with respect to antennas 1, 3, and 4. (c) Antenna 3 with respect to antennas 1, 2, and 4. (d) Antenna 4 with respect to antennas 1, 2, and 3.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. A fabricated prototype. (a) Front view, (b) rear view, (c) cylindrical human body model.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Simulated and measured reflection and isolation characteristics of the proposed antenna in free space and on-body. (a) S11, (b) S21, (c) S12, (d) S22.

Figure 13

Table 1. Characterization of the cylindrical human body model at different frequencies

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Simulated and measured on-body results due to the varying gap between the antenna and the human body.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Simulated and measured radiation pattern in free space at 4 GHz. (a) LP antenna, (b) CP antenna.

Figure 16

Fig. 16. (a) Dielectric constant measurement setup. (b) On-body radiation pattern measurement setup.

Figure 17

Fig. 17. Comparison of the simulated and measured radiation pattern on-body at 4 GHz. (a) LP antenna, (b) CP antenna.

Figure 18

Table 2. Properties of body mimicking model

Figure 19

Fig. 18. Comparison of gain and efficiency in free space and on-body. (a) Linear polarized antenna, (b) circular polarized antenna.

Figure 20

Table 3. Comparison with existing literature