Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T19:03:01.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamic bioengineered hydrogels as scaffolds for advanced stem cell and organoid culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2017

Laura C. Bahlmann
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S3E1, Canada
Ana Fokina
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, 200 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E5, Canada
Molly S. Shoichet*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S3E1, Canada Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, 200 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E5, Canada Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada
*
Address all correspondence to Molly S. Shoichet at molly.shoichet@utoronto.ca

Abstract

Bioengineered hydrogels enable systematic variation of mechanical and biochemical properties, resulting in the identification of optimal in vitro three-dimensional culture conditions for individual cell types. As the scientific community attempts to mimic and study more complex biologic processes, hydrogel design has become multi-faceted. To mimic organ and tissue heterogeneity in terms of spatial arrangement and temporal changes, hydrogels with spatiotemporal control over mechanical and biochemical properties are needed. In this prospective article, we present studies that focus on the development of hydrogels with dynamic mechanical and biochemical properties, highlighting the discoveries made using these scaffolds.

Information

Type
Biomaterials for 3D Cell Biology Prospective Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Schematic representation of the experimental set-up to study fibrosis regression using gradually softening hydrogels. (b) During 7-day mechanical prime on glass/TCPS, hepatic stellate cells differentiate toward the myofibroblast phenotype with characteristic spreading. (c) Morphological and phenotypical variations in hepatic stellate cells cultured on soft, gradually softening (stiff-to-soft), and stiff hydrogels. Scale bars: 100 µm. Reproduced from Ref. 24 with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Pulsed magnetic field from 0 to 0.75 Tesla changes hydrogel stiffness from 0.1 to ~90 kPa. (b) Schematic representations of the function principle of magnetoactive hydrogels. Reproduced from Ref. 31 by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright by John Wiley Sons, Inc. (c) Schematic representation of a cell co-culture experiment using thermoactive hydrogels. (d) Confocal fluorescence microscopy images of ADSC/cardiomyocytes forming concentric cell layers, blue (cell nuclei), green (ADSCs), red (cardiomyocytes). Adapted from Ref. 37 using Creative Commons CC-BY license.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Schematic representations of the patterning of hydrogels on the subcellular scale; (b) regularly alternating stiffness pattern, scale bar 2 µm; (c) randomly alternating stiffness pattern; (d) rounded cell on the hydrogel with 11% of regularly patterned stiff areas; (e) cell with a spread morphology on the hydrogel with 75% of regularly patterned stiff areas; (f) cell with decreased spreading on the hydrogel with 75% of randomly patterned stiff areas. Scale bars 20 µm. Reproduced from Ref. 43.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) The influence of VEGF, bFGF, and SDF incorporation into hydrogels with heparin and star-PEG on branch length, density, and stability of endothelial cells. Adapted from Ref. 58 with permission from Nature Publishing Group. (b) Effect of RGD and REDV ligand presentation on B cell proliferation. Adapted from Ref. 64 with permission from Elsevier. (c) Influence of immobilized RGD ligand concentration on the proliferation of smooth muscle cells in PEG-based hydrogels. Adapted from Ref. 63 with permission from Elsevier.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) hMSC expression of integrin αvβ3 (green) when cultured in RGDS (yellow gel) or cleaved RGDS (white gel) after 4 or 21 days (panel A). Cleaving RGDS on day 10 showed a decrease in CD105 (green) and an increase in COLII (red) production by day 21, indicating chondrocyte differentiation (panel B). Adapted from Ref. 68 with permission from Science Publishing Group. (b) hMSCs show markers of osteocyte differentiation after vitronectin is patterned into a PEG-based hydrogel. Osteocalcin (OC) (green) and ALP activity increase in areas where VTN is photopatterned. Adapted from Ref. 69 with permission from Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (a) Enzyme-mediated conjugation scheme of biochemical cues. FXIIIa catalyzes the reaction between K- and Q-peptides following photo-activation of the K-peptide. Adapted from Ref. 74 with permission from Nature Publishing Group. (b) Results of simultaneously patterning Barstar–SHH–488 (green) and biotin–CNTF–633 (red) into an agarose-based hydrogel using two-photo patterning. Adapted from Ref. 78 with permission from Nature Publishing Group. (c) Glioblastoma and human astrocyte clusters magnetically combined into a single spheroid in a hydrogel containing gold nanoparticles, iron oxide nanoparticles, and M13-derived phage particles. Adapted from Ref. 81 with permission from Nature Publishing Group.