Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T20:44:55.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The distribution and flow characteristics of surge-type glaciers in the Canadian High Arctic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Luke Copland
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada E-mail: martin.sharp@ualberta.ca
Martin J. Sharp
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada E-mail: martin.sharp@ualberta.ca
Julian A. Dowdeswell
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute and Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1ER, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A systematic review of 1959/60 aerial photography, and 1999/2000 Landsat 7 imagery, has identified 51 surge-type polythermal glaciers in the Canadian High Arctic. These were identified from the presence of features such as looped medial moraines, intense folding visible at the surface, rapid terminus advance, heavy surface crevassing, and high surface velocities. These observations suggest that surging glaciers are much more common than previously believed in the Canadian High Arctic, where only six surge-type glaciers have previously been described. Of the 51 surge-type glaciers identified in this study, 15 were observed in the active phase in the 1959/60 and/or 1999/2000 imagery. The most dramatic advances have occurred on western Axel Heiberg Island, where Iceberg,“Good Friday Bay” and Airdrop Glaciers have all advanced by 4–7 km between1959 and 1999. For glaciers with repeat Landsat 7 coverage from 1999 and 2000, image correlation software was used to determine the magnitude and spatial distribution of surge velocities. For example,“Mittie” Glacier on Manson Icefield was moving at a rate of up to 1 kma–over a distance of at least 25 km back from its terminus. The terminus of this glacier has advanced by at least 4 km since 1959, and the glacier was observed to be heavily crevassed during overflights in April 2000, with clear signs of surface lowering of 10–25 m indicated by a strandline.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2003
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distribution of surge-type glaciers in the QEI identified in this study (base imagery from the RADARSAT Orthomosaic of Canada courtesy of the Canadian Centre for Remote Sensing). Icefield and ice-cap names are shown.

Figure 1

Table 1. Details of the Landsat imagery used in this study (see Fig. 1 for icefield and ice-cap locations)

Figure 2

Table 2. List of surge-type glaciers in the QEI (* indicates unofficial name)

Figure 3

Table 2. List of surge-type glaciers in the QEI (* indicates unofficial name)

Figure 4

Fig. 2 “clarence head south” glacier (76° 40’ n, 77° 55’ w): (a) in 1959 aerial photography (© a16613-141, 7 july 1959); (b) in 1999 landsat 7 imagery (path 038, row 005, 13 july 1999); (c) surface parallel velocities (m a–1) determined from image correlation between 1999 and 2000 landsat 7 imagery (path 038, row 005,13 july 1999; path 036, row 007, 2 august 2000). large, localized vectors with anomalous flow directions indicate locations where the image correlation software did not correctly match the two images, and should be ignored.

Figure 5

Fig. 3 the terminus of “airdrop glacier”, western muller ice cap (79°50’ n, 93°40’ w): (a) in 1959 aerial photography (© a16755-052, 28 july 1959); (b) in 1999 landsat 7 imagery (path 060, row 002, 23 july 1999). terminus has advanced ∼4.5 km between the two images.

Figure 6

Fig. 4 the terminus of iceberg glacier, western muller ice cap (79˚28’n, 92° 15’ w): (a) in 1959 aerial photography (© a16754-105, 7 july 1959); (b) in 1992 landsat 4 imagery (slightly cloudy) (path 053, row 003,18 july 1992), (c) in 1999 landsat 7 imagery (path 053, row 003,22 july 1999); lines mark approximate location of terminus from (a) and (b) white dot in (b) and (c) marks location of the same point in 1992 and 1999: displacement is ∼4 km.