Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T08:17:20.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Origin and magnitude of the large piezoelectric response in the lead-free (1–x)BiFeO3–xBaTiO3 solid solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2011

Serhiy O. Leontsev*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
Richard E. Eitel
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: leontsev@uky.edu

Abstract

Mechanisms and magnitudes of the large piezoelectric response observed in lead-free (1–x)BiFeO3–xBaTiO3 (BFBT) ceramics are investigated. Preceding studies reported significant strain hysteresis and hard ferroelectric behavior in BFBT leading to a small low-field piezoelectric coefficient, instability of the poled domain state, and rapid degradation of piezoelectric properties. The current investigation shows that under application of a suitable direct current (dc) bias to stabilize the ferroelectric phase low- and high-field piezoelectric coefficients (d33) of 150 pC/N and 250 pC/N are observed for the composition 0.67BiFeO3–0.33BaTiO3 + 0.1 wt% MnO with a Curie temperature of 605 °C. Such enhancement of electromechanical properties under dc bias is in contrast to the expected behavior in traditional piezoelectric materials such as soft lead zirconate titanate (PZT). The large piezoelectric coefficients confirm strong intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to the piezoelectric response in BFBT, which coupled with high ferroelectric Curie temperature TC > 500 °C, suggests BFBT-based materials as promising lead-free alternatives to PZT piezoceramics.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

TABLE I. Room temperature dielectric constant and tanδ data (measured at 1 kHz), estimated Curie (TC) and depolarization (Td) temperatures, dc resistivity, high- and low-filed piezoelectric coefficients for unmodified and Mn-doped BFBT ceramics.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. Unipolar strain data measured on poled Mn-modified BFBT ceramics. Data for PZT (TRS200HD) ceramics is given for comparison.30

Figure 2

FIG. 2. (a) Variation of the piezoelectric Rayleigh coefficient α and (b) extrapolated low-field piezoelectric coefficient dint for Mn-doped BFBT ceramics with the molar fraction of BaTiO3.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. In-phase component of the piezoelectric strain coefficient (d33) as a function of ac field amplitude (E0) for PZT (a) (TRS200HD), (b) BF25BT1M, and (c) BF33BT1M ceramics at different values of dc bias (Ebias).

Figure 4

TABLE II. Berlincourt (d33) and extrapolated low-field (dint) piezoelectric coefficients, piezoelectric Rayleigh parameter (α) for BFBT and PZT ceramics.

Figure 5

FIG. 4. Piezoelectric strain-field data for PZT 9 (a) (TRS200HD) and (b, c) Mn-doped BFBT ceramics taken at maximum ac field amplitude (E0 = 10 kV/cm) and different dc biases (Ebias = 0–40 kV/cm).

Figure 6

FIG. 5. Bright-field TEM image of (a) unpoled and (b) poled BF33BT1M ceramics.

Figure 7

FIG. 6. Bright-field TEM image of (a) unpoled and (b) poled BF25BT1M ceramics.