Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T15:27:58.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vitro encystment of Himasthla elongata cercariae (Digenea, Echinostomatidae) in the haemolymph of blue mussels Mytilus edulis as a tool for assessing cercarial infectivity and molluscan susceptibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2012

I.A. Levakin
Affiliation:
The Laboratory of Parasitic Worms, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
E.A. Losev
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
K.E. Nikolaev
Affiliation:
The White Sea Biological Station, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
K.V. Galaktionov*
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia The White Sea Biological Station, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Infectivity of Himasthla elongata cercariae to mussels, their second intermediate hosts, and resistance by these hosts to infection were assessed on the basis of the cercariae's ability to encyst in mussel haemolymph in vitro. A series of experimental in vivo infections of mussels with batches of cercariae, each batch released from a different single infected mollusc and referred to as a clone (due to their shared genotype), demonstrated that the results of the in vitro tests corresponded to the actual indices of infectivity/susceptibility of the parasites and their hosts. Most cercarial clones had high infectivity, with a few clones having very high or, at the other extreme, very low infectivity. A similar pattern was revealed in mussel resistance to cercarial infection. Most of the molluscs tested were moderately susceptible to cercarial infection, but at each extreme a small fraction (less than 10%) displayed very high or very low susceptibility. It was shown that there were no totally compatible or totally incompatible ‘cercaria clone/mussel’ combinations. Results obtained are compared with the data on intra-population variability using the characters parasite infectivity/host compatibility for trematode/mollusc–first intermediate host associations. Results are made relevant to actual infection levels in mussel settlements at the White Sea.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 The plate for testing infectivity of Himasthla elongata cercarial clones and mussel resistance (explanations in the text). Vertical rows (A–H): cercarial clones (wells with cercariae from the same clone (8) are highlighted by the same shading and shown by a solid horizontal line). Horizontal rows: (1–11) haemolymph from 11 mussel individuals (wells with haemolymph from the same mussel individual are shown by a broken vertical line); (12) filtered seawater.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 The ratio of successfully encysted cercariae (REC) of Himasthla elongata in the Mytilus edulis haemolymph in vitro (an example of 16 combinations ‘parasite clone–host individual’). Columns with the same shading represent the same cercarial clones.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Average encystment rate of Himasthla elongata cercariae in vitro in the haemolymph of 6-year-old Mytilus edulis individuals. (A) Average encystment rate of cercarial clones (HAREC) (each dot on the plot stands for average encystment rate of cercariae of one clone in the haemolymph of different mussel individuals); (B) average assessment of the degree of expression of defence reactions in samples of mussel haemolymph (MAREC) (each dot on the plot stands for average encystment rate of cercariae of different clones in the haemolymph of the same mussel individual); R, fully resistant mussels; S, fully susceptible mussels.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Average encystment rate of ten Himasthla elongata clones in Mytilus edulis haemolymph in vitro. White column, first experiment; shaded column, second experiment made 2 weeks after the first experiment.

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Average encystment rate of Himasthla elongata cercariae in mussel haemolymph (in vitro test) (A) and in the same mussel individuals that had served as the source of haemolymph (experimental infection) (B). Compatible (white column) and incompatible (shaded column) host–parasite associations ‘Mytilus edulis individual/Himasthla elongata clone’ were selected on the basis of the in vitro test (see text for details).

Figure 5

Fig. 6 Average encystment rate of Himasthla elongata cercariae in the haemolymph of large (5- to 7-year-old) mussels (A) (in vitro test) and small (2- to 3-year-old) mussels (B) (experimental infection). Cercarial clones (‘effective’ (white column) and ‘ineffective’ (shaded column) cercariae) are grouped according to their encystment success in vitro.