Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:04:19.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assembly and alignment of conjugated polymers: materials design, processing, and applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2015

Kyeongwoon Chung
Affiliation:
Macromolecular Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
Youngchang Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
Min Sang Kwon
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
John Swets
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
Jinsang Kim*
Affiliation:
Macromolecular Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
Ji Ho Youk
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Organic Materials Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 402-751, South Korea; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Jinsang Kim atjinsang@umich.edu

Abstract

Conjugated polymers (CPs) are widely investigated because of their intriguing optical and semiconducting properties in various optoelectronic device applications. Because of the one-dimensional p-orbital overlap along the main chain, CPs exhibit strong anisotropy in optoelectronic characteristics. Therefore, macroscopic assembly and alignment of CPs are essential to fully utilize their potential properties in real device applications. Here we review various processing strategies and material design principles for efficient CP alignment that result in highly anisotropic optical and electronic characteristics. Furthermore, we thoroughly review the incorporation of aligned CPs layers in organic light-emitting diodes, organic thin film transistors, and organic photovoltaic devices. The achieved macroscopic CP alignment has increased the optoelectronic properties and greatly improved device performance.

Information

Type
Polymers/Soft Matter Prospective Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of LB deposition geometry and (b) chemical structure of prepared PPEs.[11] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 1999 American Chemical Society.)

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Schematic illustration of molecular orientation of PPP in the LB film and (b) polarized absorption spectra of 100 monolayers LB film under parallel (//) and perpendicular (⊥) to the dipping direction.[10] (reproduced with permission, copyright 1996 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustration of homemade rubbing machine. (b) Polarized absorption spectra under parallel (//) and perpendicular (⊥) to the rubbing direction of highly oriented various CPs’ film prepared by high-temperature rubbing. (c) Rubbing temperature dependence of dichroic ratio at 605 nm for P3HT and C12-pBTTT with different molecular weights.[15] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.)

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Schematic illustration of aligning F8BT by nanoconfinement. (b–e) SEM images of Si mold (b, c) and nanoimprinted F8BT using Si mold (d, e). (f) Polarized absorption spectra of aligned F8BT parallel (//) and perpendicular (⊥) to the nanochannel array. The inset shows the absorption peak intensity at different angle of polarization.[16] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2007 American Chemical Society.)

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of solvent evaporation setup with cross-sectional illustration. (b–e) AFM images of dielectric substrate (b,c) and PCDTPT fiber morphology (d,e). (b) Surface without structures, (c) 100 nm-structured (scratched) surface, (d) polymer fibers on nonstructured surface, (e) polymer fibers on 100 nm-structured (scratched) surface.[20] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.)

Figure 5

Figure 6. (a) Polarized absorption spectra of a MEH-PPV/aligned mesoporous silica composite film parallel (//) and perpendicular (⊥) to the pore direction. (b) TEM image of thin section of an aligned nanoporous silica film. (c) Schematic illustration of CP chains incorporation into the aligned nanoporous silica channels.[25] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2007 Nature Publishing Group.)

Figure 6

Figure 7. (a) A PFO nanofiber image under tapping-mode AFM. (b) Polarization PL image of a PFO nanofiber. VV refers that excitation and detection polarization are parallel to the nanofiber axis, and VH refers that excitation is parallel to the nanofiber axis but detection polarization is perpendicular to the nanofiber axis. (c) Polarized PL spectra for the same nanofiber.[26] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.)

Figure 7

Figure 8. (a) Chemical structure of OPPEs. (b) PL spectra of EHO-OPPE/UHMW-PE blend film recorded for emission parallel (0°) and perpendicular (90°) to the drawing direction. (c–e) Dichroic ratio (calculated from the integral of the respective spectra) as a function of draw ratio. (c) EHO-OPPE (Mn = 84,000 g/mol) in UHMW-PE. Inset shows dichroic ratio calculated from PL intensity. (d) EHO-OPPE (Mn = 10,000 g/mol) in UHMW-PE. (e) O-OPPE (Mn = 10,000 g/mol) in UHMW-PE.[28] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 1997 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Figure 8

Figure 9. (a) Chemical structure of PPV and PPE derivatives. (b) Absorption spectra of 1d in methylene chloride and 6CHBT. (c) Absorption spectra of 2a in methylene chloride and 6CHBT. Alignment is clearly observed from the ratio of spectra taken at 0° and 90° to the nematic director.[29] (Rreproduced with permission, copyright 2002 American Chemical Society.)

Figure 9

Figure 10. (a) Chemical structures of the polyfluorene derivatives. (b) Schematic illustration for electrospinning setup to produce aligned nanofibers. (c) Polarized PL from PF+/PMMA nanofiber. The inset shows SEM images of aligned nanofibers.[30] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Figure 10

Figure 11. (a) Polarized PL spectra for aligned MEH-PPV/PEO nanofibers. (b) Polarized PL spectra for aligned P3HT/PEO nanofibers.[32] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2011 The Royal Society of Chemistry.)

Figure 11

Figure 12. (a) Polarized optical micrograph under single polarizer (black arrow) of spin-casted P3HT from TCB (7.5 vol%)/CB mixed solvent. (b) Polarized photometry measurements at a horizontal distance of 1 mm from a spherulite structure center (s-polarization horizontal and p-polarization vertical). (c) Cross-polarized micrographs of various CPs films fabricated by spin casting from CB or TCB/CB (a)spin casted from chloroform and TCB/chloroform).[36] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Figure 12

Figure 13. Polarized transmission images and cross-polarized micrographs of P3HT film deposited by different deposition speed under blade coating (solution: 20 mg/ml P3HT and mTCB/mP3HT = 5). Dichroic ratio (DR) was measured at 550 nm. Scale bar = 500 μm[37] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2014 The Royal Society of Chemistry.)

Figure 13

Figure 14. (a) Chemical structure of CP1 and three design requirements for directed alignment under shear flow. (b) Optical micrograph of an aligned CP1 film fabricated by contact coating (inset). (c) Emission spectra of aligned CP1 film through a linear polarizer (0° = parallel to the alignment direction and 90° = perpendicular to the alignment direction). (d) The suggested mechanism of CP1 alignment[9] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.)

Figure 14

Figure 15. (a) Optical absorption and PL spectra of the rubbed NO-PPV film. The inset shows PL spectra of the rubbed film. Incident light was polarized parallel (solid line) or perpendicular (dashed line) to the rubbing direction. Dotted line refers unrubbed film. (b) EL spectra of thermally aligned device ITO: (17% ST638/83% PI) rubbed : PF2/6 : Ca :Al with polarizer detection parallel or orthogonal to the rubbing direction. The EL polarization ratio for the 477 nm peak is 15. Inset: Luminescence/voltage characteristics for ITO : Alignment layer : PF2/6 : Ca : Al devices with 17% ST638 and without ST638 in the alignment layer.[41,43] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 1995 American Institute of Physics and 1999 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69469 Weinheim.)

Figure 15

Figure 16. (a) Structure of the two-layer device with rubbed PPV and (b) absorption and PL of a 40 nm thick rubbed PPV film parallel (A∥, PL∥) and perpendicular (A⊥, PL⊥) to the rubbing direction.[45] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 1999 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Figure 16

Figure 17. Chemical structures of PFO, F8BT, F8T2, and poly[9,9-bis(2-ethylhexyl)fluorene-2,7-diyl] end-capped with N,N-bis(4-methylphenyl)-N-phenylamine (PF2/6amX, X = end-capper feed ratio).[46,48] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. and 2001 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69469 Weinheim.)

Figure 17

Figure 18. EL spectra of the polarized OLED taken under a constant current condition of 0.2 mA. The device structure is shown in the inset. EL// and EL⊥ are the perpendicular and parallel components with respect to the polarization direction of the linearly polarized light, respectively.[52] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2007 American Institute of Physics.)

Figure 18

Figure 19. SEM micrographs of electrospun MEH-PPV/PEO nanofibers: (a) aligned nanofibers and (b) random nanofibers of MEH-PPV/PEO (1 : 20 mass ratio); (c)–(f) aligned MEH-PPV/PEO nanofibers with mass ratios of 1 : 40, 1 : 20, 1 : 10, 1 : 4, respectively. The scale bar: 100 µm in (a) and (b) 5 µm in (c)–(f). PL spectra of electrospun nanofibers with various amounts of MEH-PPV (g) or P3HT (f) in PEO matrix.[32] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2011 The Royal Society of Chemistry.)

Figure 19

Figure 20. (a) Schematic diagram of a top-gate LC polymer TFT fabricated on top of a polyimide alignment layer. (b) Polarized optical absorption spectra at normal incidence in the metal-free region of a completed F8T2 TFT substrate. The incident light is polarized parallel (//) and perpendicular (⊥) to the rubbing direction. (c) Saturated transfer characteristics (Vsd = −60 V) of aligned F8T2 TFTs with channels parallel (//) and perpendicular (⊥) to the alignment direction of polymer chains. Isotropic device without uniaxial alignment is also shown (x).[19] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2000 American Institute of Physics.)

Figure 20

Figure 21. (a) Schematic diagram of zone-casting setup with parameters of T1 = 100 °C, T2 = 140 °C, v1 = 20 μm/s, and v2 = 15 μm/s. (b) AFM image of aligned ribbon-phase PBTTT deposited by zone casting (5 μm × 5 μm). (c) Optical micrograph of the aligned PBTTT film on top of LCD monitor, with zone-casting direction rotated perpendicular (left) and parallel (right) to polarization direction of light emitted from the LCD monitor (indicated by the yellow arrow). (d) Polarized UV–vis optical absorption spectrum of PBTTT films.[55] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Figure 21

Figure 22. (a) 10 × 10 μm2 and 2.5 × 2.5 μm2 AFM height (left) and phase (right) images of a nanorubbed area. The vertical gray scale is 10 nm. Inset: Fourier transform of the height image. (b) Optical micrographs between crossed polarizers for P3HT films with four 10 × 10 μm2 rubbed squares. The crossed polarizers are oriented as shown by the white arrows. (c) Schematic representation of the P3HT chain arrangement when the nanorubbing is performed parallel (left) and perpendicular (right) to the source–drain axis.[58] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V.)

Figure 22

Figure 23. (a) Output curve of a TFT device built on the aligned CP1 film. The source–drain direction is parallel to the CP1 alignment direction. (b) Transfer curve of a TFT device with a source–drain oriented parallel to the CP1 alignment direction. (d) Transfer curve of a TFT device having a source–drain oriented perpendicular to the CP1 alignment direction. (d) Hole mobility of TFT devices depending on the orientation of the source–drain relative to the CP1 alignment direction. The double-headed blue arrow is the source–drain direction.[9] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.)

Figure 23

Figure 24. (a) Absorption of P3HT films upon different treatments. (b) Polarized absorption of the quasi-bilayer P3HT-PC61BM film after annealing at 150 °C for 5 min. (c) Dichroic J–V characterization of the inverted quasi-bilayer ZOPV devices with reflective electrodes; inset: polarizing IPCE spectra and (d) inverted quasi-bilayer ZOPV device architecture using reflective Al electrode.[59] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Figure 24

Figure 25. (a) Schematic illustration of rubbing process for in-plane aligned PV layers. (b) AFM images of the reference layer (left panel) and the rubbed sample layer (right panel). The x-axis represents the direction of rubbing. (c) Polarizing microscopic textures of the sample layer at four angles of rotation of the layers under an optical polarizing microscope. The white arrows indicate the rubbing direction and the orientation of the crossed polarizers is shown by the crossed arrows (A, P).[61] (Reproduced with permission, copyright 2012 Optical Society of America.)