Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T07:40:05.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental and social cues can be used in combination to develop sustainable breeding techniques for goat reproduction in the subtropics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

J. A. Delgadillo*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina, Departamento de Ciencias Médico Veterinarias, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Periférico Raúl López Sánchez y Carretera a Santa Fe, C.P. 27054, Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico
*

Abstract

Goat breeds from subtropical latitudes show different annual reproductive cycles. Some of them display large seasonal variations in their annual breeding season, while others display a moderate seasonality or sexual activity all year round. This reproductive seasonality causes seasonality of milk, cheese and meat productions and, as a consequence, induces wide variation in producer incomes. To solve this problem and provide methods allowing producers to breed animals during the anestrous period and stabilize production all year round, it is necessary to have a deep knowledge of their annual sexual activity and to identify the environmental factors controlling the timing of the annual reproductive cycle. Then, it is possible to build on these knowledge sustainable breeding techniques adapted to the environmental, economic and social characteristics of the local breeding system. In this review, I will illustrate this strategy through the example of our experiments in subtropical goats. First, we determined the characteristics of the annual breeding season in both male and female goats. Second, we identified the photoperiod as the major environmental factor controlling the timing of this annual breeding season. Third, we used the photoperiod to stimulate indirectly the sexual behavior of does. Indeed, we used photoperiodic treatments to stimulate the sexual activity of bucks during the non-breeding season. These sexually active male goats were then used to induce and synchronize the estrous behavior and ovulatory activity of anestrous females in confined or grazing conditions by using the ‘male effect’. Under subtropical conditions, these results constitute an original manner to control the reproductive activity of local goats using the photoperiod combined with the ‘male effect.’

Information

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1 Annual changes in the photoperiod (a), rainfall (b), food availability (c) and fertilizations (d) of local female goats from subtropical Mexico maintained in contact with males under natural grazing conditions (adapted from Sáenz-Escárcega et al. (1991)).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Seasonal variations (mean ± s.e.m.) in testicular weight (a), plasma testosterone concentrations (b), total number of spermatozoa per ejaculate (c) and progressive spermatozoa motility (d) in confined well-nourished local male goats from subtropical Mexico maintained in an open pen and subjected to natural photoperiodic and temperature changes (adapted from Delgadillo et al. (1999)).

Figure 2

Figure 3 Seasonal variations in the percentage of female goats showing cyclic ovulatory activity (a), or LH secretion (b; mean ± s.e.m.) in ovariectomized estradiol-treated local female goats from subtropical Mexico maintained in open pens (●) or natural grazing conditions (○) and subjected to natural variations of photoperiodic and temperature changes (adapted from Duarte et al. (2008)).

Figure 3

Figure 4 Changes (mean ± s.e.m.) in plasma testosterone concentrations in local male goats from subtropical Mexico subjected to natural photoperiodic variations (a) or to alternations between 3 months of long days (14 h of light/day) and 3 months of short days (10 h of light/day; b). Gray areas indicate the months of short days (adapted from Delgadillo et al. (2004)).

Figure 4

Figure 5 Changes in cyclic ovulatory activity in local female goats from subtropical Mexico subjected to natural photoperiodic variations (a) or to alternations between 3 months of long days (14 h of light/day) and 3 months of short days (10 h of light/day; b). Gray areas indicate the months of short days (adapted from Duarte et al. (2010)).

Figure 5

Figure 6 Changes (mean ± s.e.m.) in plasma testosterone concentrations in local male goats from subtropical Mexico subjected to natural photoperiodic variations (○, or to 2.5 months of artificial long days (16 h of light/day) from November 1, and then treated with two s.c. melatonin implants (▵) or exposed to natural short days (▪) (adapted from Delgadillo et al. (2002)).