Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:09:26.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of suspended periodic defect structures near a planar microwave ring resonator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2011

Tulika Giri
Affiliation:
Microwave Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra 282110, India.
K. S. Daya*
Affiliation:
Microwave Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra 282110, India.
*
Corresponding author: K. S. Daya Email: sdayak@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports the effect of suspended periodic defect structure in switching the frequency of ring resonator. It has been observed in simulations and experiments that this non-intrusive method can switch the frequency by 31 MHz for square lattice of suspended periodic defect and by 124 MHz for a triangular lattice of suspended periodic defect structure.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Top view of microstrip RR with SPDS, (b) square SPDS, and (c) triangular SPDS.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simulated and measured performance of RR with and without SPDS. ———, Measured result; – – – –, simulated result.

Figure 2

Table 1. Performance comparison of RR with and without SPDS.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Simulated response of square SPDS at different radii.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Simulated response of triangular SPDS at different radii.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Cross-sectional view of (a) field distribution in the suspended region of RR with PGP, (b) field distribution in the suspended region of RR with SPDS, and (c) top view of the field in SPDS.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Response of change in frequency versus ratio of radius r and lattice constant a for (a) square SPDS and (b) triangular SPDS.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Performance of (a) square EBG structure and (b) triangular EBG structure with a transmission line.