Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-qr5l4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T15:07:18.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of lithology and climate on bedrock river incision and terrace development along the Buffalo National River, Arkansas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2023

Kathleen Rodrigues*
Affiliation:
Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada, USA, 86512
Amanda Keen-Zebert
Affiliation:
Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada, USA, 86512
Stephanie Shepherd
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA, 36849
Mark R. Hudson
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, USA, 80225
Charles J. Bitting
Affiliation:
National Park Service, Buffalo National River, Harrison, Arkansas, USA, 72601
Bradley G. Johnson
Affiliation:
Environmental Studies Department, Davidson College, Davidson, North Carolina, USA, 28035
Abigail Langston
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA, 66506
*
*Corresponding author email address: <krodrigues@nevada.unr.edu>
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Buffalo National River in northwest Arkansas preserves an extensive Quaternary record of fluvial bedrock incision and aggradation across lithologies of variable resistance. In this work, we apply optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating to strath and fill terraces along the Buffalo River to elucidate the role of lithology and climate on the development of the two youngest terrace units (Qtm and Qty). Our OSL ages suggest a minimum strath planation age of ca. 250 ka for the Qtm terraces followed by a ca. 200 ka record of aggradation. Qtm incision likely occurred near the last glacial maximum (LGM), prior to the onset of Qty fill terrace aggradation ca. 14 ka. Our terrace ages are broadly consistent with other regional terrace records, and comparison with available paleoclimatic archives suggests that terrace aggradation and incision occurred during drier and wetter hydrological conditions, respectively. Vertical bedrock incision rates were also calculated using OSL-derived estimates of Qtm strath planation and displayed statistically significant spatial variability with bedrock lithology, ranging from ~35 mm/ka in the higher resistance reaches and ~16 mm/ka in the lower resistance reaches. In combination with observations of valley width and terrace distribution, these results suggest that vertical processes outpace lateral ones in lithologic reaches with higher resistance.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023
Figure 0

Figure 1. The Buffalo National River watershed with 5-m DEM hillshade and mapped geological units. The inset shows the location of the Buffalo River watershed in northwest Arkansas. The river flows from west to east. OSL sample locations are listed as letters: (A) Boxley; (B) Steel Creek; (C) Ozark; (D) Blue Hole; (E) Margaret White; (F) Tyler Bend; (G) South Maumee. Geological units for the Buffalo River watershed include the Quaternary deposits including the terraces studied here (Q); Pennsylvanian Atoka Formation (a); Pennsylvanian Bloyd Formation and Prairie Grove Member of the Hale Formation (bh); Pennsylvanian Cane Hill Member of Hale Formation (hc), Mississippian Pitkin Limestone, Fayetteville Shale, Batesville Sandstone (Mpfb), Mississippian Boone Formation (Mb), Silurian Lafferty, St. Clair, and Brassfield limestones (Slsb); Ordovician Carson Shale, Fernvale Limestone, Plattin Limestone, and Kimmswick Limestone, and Joachim Dolomite (Ocj); Ordovician St. Peter Sandstone and Everton Formation (Ose); and Ordovician Powell Dolomite (Op). Refer to Keen-Zebert et al. (2017) and references therein for complete lithologic descriptions. Figure adapted from Zunka (2018).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (A) Changes in valley lithology and Qtm strath terrace tread elevations over downstream distance. Lithological reaches are subdivided based on the lithology exposed at modern river level. Qtm terraces dated in this study are highlighted in white boxes; circles correspond to their tread elevations; dashes (within the white boxes) refer to their buried straths. (B) Buffalo River longitudinal profile and valley width over downstream distance; MSL = mean sea level. (C) Simplified stratigraphic columns from each sampled Qty and Qtm terrace showing OSL ages and major changes in sedimentology with depth. (A) and (B) are adapted from Keen-Zebert et al. (2017).

Figure 2

Figure 3. (A–C) Cross-sectional profiles of the three Qtm terrace study sites with mapped lithological contacts. Trenches where OSL samples were collected are labeled with a ‘T#’ corresponding to the data in Table 1. Dashed lines represent uncertainty in the position of lithological contacts. ‘SU’ refers to the strath unconformity used for vertical incision rate calculations. Inset figures show profile orientation on LiDAR images and sample numbers for each site. The mapped terrace boundaries refer to those provided in the geologic maps of Chandler and Ausbrooks (2015a, b) and Turner and Hudson (2010).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Field photos showing typical features of Qtm and Qty terraces preserved along the Buffalo River. (A) Margaret White Qty T2 terrace with OSL samples hammered into the trench wall; note the stratigraphic homogeneity, which is typical for the Buffalo River terrace deposits. (B) Boxley Qty terrace shown in profile from the perspective of the modern channel. (C) Qtm and Qto terraces preserved at Ozark. (D) Blue Hole Qtm T1 location with tall bluffs exposed in the background opposite the Buffalo River.

Figure 4

Table 1. OSL ages and inferred vertical bedrock incision rates for three Qtm terraces on different lithologically defined reaches of the Buffalo River. Vertical bedrock incision rates were calculated based on the OSL-derived ages from nearest the strath unconformity and the elevation of the underlying bedrock surface above the modern channel. Data in bold were used to calculate bedrock incision rates at each site. For a compilation of all data used for dose rate and age calculation see Supplementary Table 4.

Figure 5

Table 2. OSL ages for Qty terraces. For a compilation of all data used for dose rate and age calculation see Supplementary Table 5.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Luminescence characteristics of Buffalo River quartz. (A) Representative dose response curve with inset decay curve for a single grain of BUFF035 quartz; (B) equivalent dose distribution for modern sample BR002 (see Supplementary Fig. 4 for De distribution from the additional modern sample, BR005); (C) single grain De distribution for sample BUFF035; (D) TT-OSL dose response curve with inset decay curve for a multigrain quartz aliquot of BUFF044; (E) TT-OSL De distribution for modern sample BR002; (F) TT-OSL De distribution for sample BUFF044.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Composite regional paleoenvironmental and fluvial records. Marine Isotope Stages are listed as bold black numbers at the top of the figure. Interglacial stages are shown as vertical gray bands; glacial stages are shown as white bands. Marine isotope substages are not shown here. (A) Fluctuations in benthic δ18O composition provided by Lisiecki and Raymo (2005) is shown in black; the relative eustatic sea level reconstruction by Spratt and Lisiecki (2016) is shown in red; (B, C) paired δ13C and δ18O records from speleothems at Fitton Cave, AR, respectively (Paces et al., 2017); (D) speleothem growth rates from central Texas (Musgrove et al., 2001); (E) speleothem growth rates from Fitton Cave, AR (Paces et al., 2017); (F) δ13C records from speleothems at Beckham Creek Cave, AR (Denniston et al., 1999); (G) OSL ages for the Qtm and Qty terraces preserved along the Buffalo River; individual ages with errors for Qtm deposits are shown as circles; individual Qty ages are not shown here (refer to Tables 1 and 2 for a list of OSL ages); (H) ages of terraces preserved along Owl Creek, a tributary of the Brazos River in Central Texas (Meier et al., 2013); (I) ages of Prairie Complex terraces along the lower Mississippi River (Shen et al., 2012); (J) ages of terraces preserved along the Cimarron River in the High Plains of southwestern Kansas (Layzell et al., 2015).

Supplementary material: File

Rodrigues et al. supplementary material

Rodrigues et al. supplementary material

Download Rodrigues et al. supplementary material(File)
File 74 KB