Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:39:50.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental pressure sensing and technology of piezoelectric microwave/RF MEMS filters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2011

Alessandro Massaro*
Affiliation:
Center of Bio-Molecular Nanotechnology, IIT Italian Institute of Technology, Arnesano 73100, Italy.
Giuseppe Venanzoni
Affiliation:
Dipartimento of Ingegneria Biomedica Elettronica e Telecomunicazioni DIBET of Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Italy.
Marco Farina
Affiliation:
Dipartimento of Ingegneria Biomedica Elettronica e Telecomunicazioni DIBET of Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Italy.
Antonio Morini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento of Ingegneria Biomedica Elettronica e Telecomunicazioni DIBET of Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Italy.
Tullio Rozzi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento of Ingegneria Biomedica Elettronica e Telecomunicazioni DIBET of Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Italy.
Roberto Cingolani
Affiliation:
Center of Bio-Molecular Nanotechnology, IIT Italian Institute of Technology, Arnesano 73100, Italy.
Adriana Passaseo
Affiliation:
National Nanotechnology Laboratory, Institute of Nanoscience of CNR of Lecce, Italy.
Massimo De Vittorio
Affiliation:
Center of Bio-Molecular Nanotechnology, IIT Italian Institute of Technology, Arnesano 73100, Italy.
*
Corresponding author: A. Massaro Email: alessandro.massaro@iit.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this work, we analyze the pressure sensing of a thin film molybdenum/aluminumnitride/molybdenum (Mo/AlN/Mo) microwave/RF MEMS filter fabricated by a simple technology. After an experimental characterization in a frequency range between 1 and 36 GHz, we focused on the piezoelectric effect due to the stress properties of the piezoelectric AlN layer by applying forces by means of weights. Variations in the bandpass region of the microwave/RF filter are observed by proving high sensitivity also for low applied weights. We check by a properly designed three-dimensional (3D) finite-element method (FEM) tool the pressure-sensing property of the proposed device. Finally, we analyze the bad gap property of a chip with central defect around 40 GHz.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Chip with central microwave/RF MEMS filter. (b) Cross-section of the filter with pressure applied in the middle of the periodic structure.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Image of the used experimental setup. (b) Layout of the tapered waveguides used in the experimental setup.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. 3D-FEM modeling and 3D-FEM mesh of the microwave/RF pressure sensor.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Pressure-sensing principle and propagating modes. (a) The longitudinal section of the periodic waveguide. (b) The longitudinal section and geometrical deformation of the periodic device by applying loads.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Scattering measured parameter S12. The measurements are performed by considering the sample without weights (sample plot), the sample with an applied weight of 2.4 g (P1 plot) and by a weight of 19.09 g (P2 plot). Inset: zoomed image around the new generated cutoff frequency.

Figure 5

Table 1. Experimental and 3D FEM results: major plot variations for different frequencies.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Scattering measured parameter S12 before the applied weights (plot ref. [1]), and after the experimentation (plot ref. [2]): both the plots are obtained without the weights.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. 3D-FEM modeling: microwave MEMS sensor for a working frequency f0 = 11.19 GHz by using the P2 weight. (a) Electric field configuration without applied pressure. (b) Electric field configuration by applying P2.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Scattering measured parameter S12 with and without the actual sensor introduced between the tapered waveguides of Fig. 2(a).

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Error of the measurements and sensor sensitivity versus the applied weights.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Transmittivity response of the chip of Fig. 1(a) with central defect obtained by missing the central hole. Inset: measured chip.