Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:15:32.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atmospheric Particles: Their Physical and Chemical Characteristics, and Deposition Processes Relevant to the Chemical Composition of Glaciers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

L.A. Barrie*
Affiliation:
Atmospheric Environment Service, 4905 Dufferin St., Downsview, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Atmospheric particles originate from a variety of natural and anthropogenic sources. Estimates of man’s contribution to the total particle mass loading of the atmosphere range from 5 to 48%. Much of this is initially in the form of gases (SO2, NO2, hydrocarbons) that convert to particles while being transported to glacial receptors where they are incorporated into snow. The complex physical and chemical processes involved in the deposition of atmospheric particles to glaciers are reviewed. Both wet and dry deposition contribute to the pollutant loading of a snowfield. However, except in the case of low snowfall (<60 kg m−2 a−1) or exceptionally large particle sizes, such as might be released by volcanoes or when unrimed snowfall predominates, wet deposition is dominant. Estimates of the relative importance of wet and dry deposition based on scavenging ratios for rimed snowfall and dry deposition velocities agree well with observations in southern Greenland.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1985
Figure 0

Table IEstimates of Global Particle Production from Man-Made and Natural Sources Representative of the 1970s*

Figure 1

Fig. 1A comparison of the geographical configuration of northern and southern polar regions.

Figure 2

Fig. 2The seasonal variation of anthropogenic sulphate and vanadium at Mould Bay, Canada (M in Fig.1) between 1979 and 1983.

Figure 3

Fig. 3A schematic depiction of an atmospheric aerosol mass-size distribution showing the principal modes, the source of mass in each mode and the principal removal mechanisms (adapted from Whitby 1978). Note that the relative magnitude of each model is very dependent on source strengths and proximity to sources. In general, the nuclei mode is negligibly small in terms of mass.

Figure 4

Fig. 4The mass-size distribution of particles at (a) Barrow, Alaska, (b) Mauna Loa, Hawaii, (c) Cape Grim, Tasmania and (d) South Pole measured by Bigg (1980).

Figure 5

Fig. 5Cation and anion balance in suspended particles at Igloolik, Canada as a function of particle diameter D (Hoff and others 1983). Hydrogen ion is inferred from an ion balance. The dotted line represents the fraction of anion equivalents required to balance sodium and magnesium ions.

Figure 6

Fig. 6Humidographs for pure laboratory-generated sulphate compounds measured by Charlson and others (1978). The dashed curves are theoretical estimates. The vertical axis represents the amounts of particle light scattering at a finite relative humidity to that at zero relative humidity. This is equal to the ratio of particle mass.

Figure 7

Fig. 7The precipitation scavenging process.

Figure 8

Fig. 8The theoretical dependence of the collision efficiency of plate-like ice crystals and particles on particle size, electrical charging (q = charge density) and evaporation (RH = relative humidity). From Martin and others 1980.

Figure 9

Fig. 9The sulphate scavenging ratio averaged over several hours as a function of precipitation rate for rimed and unrimed snowfalls (Scott 1981).

Figure 10

Fig. 10The daily average sulphate scavenging ratio of snow in eastern Canada as a function of precipitation amount (Barrie 1985).

Figure 11

Fig. 11A schematic diagram of the two-layer, electrical analog model used to represent dry deposition processes in snow. For explanations of the various resistances see Table II.

Figure 12

Table IIResistances to Particle Transfer Between Atmosphere and Snowpack that are Operative in the Dry Deposition Process (see Fig.11)

Figure 13

Fig. 12The theoretical dependence of dry deposition velocity of particles in snow on particle size for different relative humidities. The two points are observations representing the mean of five measurements of the deposition of particles of (NH4)2SO4 of 0.7 ± 0.3 µm diameter to snow (Ibrahim and others 1983).

Figure 14

Table IIIA Comparison of Wet, Dry and Total Deposition Velocities of Fine and Coarse Particulate Matter for Rimed and Unrimed Snowfall on an Annual Basis