Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T11:34:13.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of reduced nitrogen fertilizer application rates on grain yield and rice quality of early- and late-season dual-use rice in South China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2025

Jinsong Liu
Affiliation:
Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
Taotao Yang*
Affiliation:
Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
Jixiang Zou
Affiliation:
Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
Longmei Wu
Affiliation:
Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
Xiaozhe Bao
Affiliation:
Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
Bin Zhang
Affiliation:
Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
*
Corresponding author: Taotao Yang; Email: yangtaotao19910927@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reducing nitrogen (N) fertilizer application is a sustainable practice in rice production. The effects of reducing N fertilizer input on grain yield and rice quality of early- and late-season dual-use rice (ELDR) in South China remain uncertain. Therefore, a short-term field trial was conducted with a high-yielding ELDR cultivar (Yuehesimiao, YHSM) and a low-yielding ELDR cultivar (Meixiangzhan 2, MXZ). The rice was cultivated with a 20% reduced N application rate (RN2), a 10% reduced rate (RN1) and the conventional N application rate (CN). In the early season, compared to CN, RN2 reduced the grain yield of YHSM and MXZ by an average of 16.1 and 6.6%, respectively, while RN1 lowered YHSM grain yield by 11.2% on average and had no effect on MXZ yield. In addition, RN2 decreased the milling and eating qualities of the two cultivars in the early season, while RN1 did not alter their milling, appearance or eating qualities. In the late season, neither RN2 nor RN1 affected grain yield or rice quality for both cultivars. Therefore, short-term reductions of 10 and 20% in N application could maintain grain yield and rice quality at current N fertilizer application rates in the late season. However, the early-season results only recommended a 10% reduced N fertilizer application rate for low-yielding ELDR cultivars to sustain grain yield and rice quality. The findings of this study can provide a theoretical basis for N management of ELDR in South China.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Three-way ANOVA (F value) for grain yield and yield components of ELDR

Figure 1

Figure 1. Effects of a short-term reduction in N fertilizer application on grain yield and yield components of ELDR. (a, c, e, g, i and k) for early season; (b, d, f, h, j and l) for late season. YHSM, Yuehesimiao; MXZ, Meixiangzhan 2. RN2, 20% reduction in the N fertilizer application rate treatment; RN1, 10% reduction in the N fertilizer application rate treatment; CN, conventional N fertilizer application rate treatment. Data are means ± sd after averaging across two years. Different letters indicate significant differences among nitrogen treatments at P < 0.05 level using the LSD test.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Pearson correlations between grain yield and total number of spikelets, head rice rate and protein content in early season. YHSM, Yuehesimiao; MXZ, Meixiangzhan 2. ** indicates significant at the 0.01 level.

Figure 3

Table 2. Three-way ANOVA (F value) for dry matter accumulation of ELDR

Figure 4

Figure 3. Effects of a short-term reduction in N fertilizer application on dry matter accumulation of ELDR. (a) Tillering stage, (b) heading stage and (c) (maturity stage) for early season; (d) tillering stage, (e) (heading stage) and (f) (maturity stage) for late season. YHSM, Yuehesimiao; MXZ, Meixiangzhan 2. RN2, 20% reduction in the N fertilizer application rate treatment; RN1, 10% reduction in the N fertilizer application rate treatment; CN, conventional N fertilizer application rate treatment. Data are means ± sd after averaging across two years. Different letters indicate significant differences among nitrogen treatments at P < 0.05 level using the LSD test.

Figure 5

Table 3. Three-way ANOVA (F value) for milling and appearance qualities of ELDR

Figure 6

Figure 4. Effects of a short-term reduction in N fertilizer application on milling and appearance quality of ELDR. (a, c, e and g) for early season; (b, d, f and h) for late season. YHSM, Yuehesimiao; MXZ, Meixiangzhan 2. RN2, 20% reduction in the N fertilizer application rate treatment; RN1, 10% reduction in the N fertilizer application rate treatment; CN, conventional N fertilizer application rate treatment. Data are means ± sd after averaging across two years. Different letters indicate significant differences among nitrogen treatments at P < 0.05 level using the LSD test.

Figure 7

Table 4. Effects of a short-term reduction in N fertilizer application on amylose and protein contents, cooked rice texture and taste value in early season (2023)

Figure 8

Table 5. Effects of a short-term reduction in N fertilizer application on amylose and protein contents, cooked rice texture and pasting property in late season (2023)

Figure 9

Figure 5. Pearson correlations among stickiness, taste value, amylose and protein contents in early season (2023). ** indicates significant at the 0.01 level.