Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T03:51:21.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vitro exposure system using magnetic resonant coupling wireless power transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2014

Kohei Mizuno*
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Sustainable Humanosphere, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto 6110011, Japan. Phone: +81 774 38 4954
Junji Miyakoshi
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Sustainable Humanosphere, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto 6110011, Japan. Phone: +81 774 38 4954
Naoki Shinohara
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Sustainable Humanosphere, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto 6110011, Japan. Phone: +81 774 38 4954
*
Corresponding author: K. Mizuno Email: mizuno.kohei.67z@st.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Abstract

Wireless power transfer (WPT) technology using the resonant coupling phenomenon has been widely studied. However, possible relationships between WPT exposure and human health have not been experimentally evaluated. In this study, we developed a new in vitro exposure system to evaluate the biological effects of magnetic resonant coupling WPT. The WPT was carried out using a self-resonant helical coil, which was designed to transfer the power with 85.4% efficiency at a 12.5 MHz resonant frequency. The magnetic field at the positions of the cell culture dishes is approximately twice the reference level for occupational exposure as stated in the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines. The specific absorption rate (SAR) at the positions of the cell culture dishes match the respective reference levels stated in the ICNIRP guidelines. In this paper, the coil design for the magnetic resonant coupling in the in vitro exposure system and characteristics, such as power transfer efficiency, electric field and magnetic field distributions, and SAR of the exposure system, are described.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. HFSS–FEM model of basic coil design for exposure system. The coils in this model have a diameter of 200 mm. X and Y axes are the centers of the transmitting and receiving coils. Z-axis coincides with center line of coils.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simulated power transfer efficiency, calculated by |S21|2.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Simulated results of magnetic and electric field distributions on the X–Z plane at 16.0 and 17.2 MHz. 200 W high-frequency power is applied.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Simulated results of magnetic and electric field distributions on the X–Y plane at Z = 40 mm at 16.0 and 17.2 MHz. 200 W high-frequency power is applied.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Simulated power transfer efficiency with or without stainless steel box.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Uniformity of magnetic field distribution on the X–Y plane at Z = 40 mm in metal box.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Ratio of subpeak to main peak of power transfer efficiency.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Diagram of the experimental in vitro exposure system.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Photograph of coils for magnetic resonant coupling WPT within the CO2 incubator.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Temperature dynamics within the cell culture medium.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. HFSS–FEM model of the magnetic resonant coupling in vitro exposure system.

Figure 11

Table 1. Dielectric properties of materials used for numerical analysis.

Figure 12

Table 2. Measured and simulated power transfer efficiencies in the in vitro exposure system.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Measured power transfer efficiency versus distance between receiving and load coils in the in vitro exposure system.

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Ratio of subpeak-to-main peak of measured and simulated power transfer efficiencies in the in vitro exposure system.

Figure 15

Fig. 14. Simulated magnetic and electric field distributions on the X–Z plane and at each cell culture position in the in vitro exposure system.

Figure 16

Table 3. Magnetic and electric fields at each cell culture position.

Figure 17

Fig. 15. Simulated SAR distribution inside the culture medium in a 60-mm diameter dish.

Figure 18

Fig. 16. Histograms of SAR distribution at each cell culture position. Vertical axis is the number of mesh count. Horizontal axis is SAR with 1 W/kg bin width.

Figure 19

Table 4. SAR at each cell culture position.