TRYPANOSOMES, DIVERGENCE AND PROTEOMIC INSIGHTS

The completion of a genome sequence for one strain of T. brucei yielded many insights into the biology of trypanosomes, and provided the vital framework for going forward with molecular level dissection of trypanosome biology (Berriman et al. Reference Berriman2005). This has been coupled with the emergence of RNA interference (RNAi) for suppression of gene expression in a conditional manner, RNA sequencing approaches to monitor transcription (Kolev et al. Reference Kolev, Franklin, Carmi, Shi, Michaeli and Tschudi2010) and most recently RNAi-based expression knockdown screens (RIT-seq, Alsford et al. Reference Alsford, Turner, Obado, Sanchez-Flores, Glover, Berriman, Hertz-Fowler and Horn2011), with the result that our understanding of the cell biology and metabolism of T. brucei has advanced at an accelerated pace during the past five to ten years. However, many of the investigations in this period have been centered around ‘candidate’-based approaches, i.e. mining the genome for gene products with either known functions or at least functions in known processes or pathways or predictions based on similarity of either sequence or domain architectures; transcription, histone modification, intracellular trafficking and the cytoskeleton are all good examples of where this type of approach has been of great value (see Kawahara et al. Reference Kawahara, Siegel, Ingram, Alsford, Cross and Horn2008; Luz Ambrósio et al. Reference Luz Ambrósio, Lee, Panigrahi, Nguyen, Cicarelli and Günzl2009; Field and Carrington, Reference Field and Carrington2009; Wickstead et al. Reference Wickstead, Carrington, Gluenz and Gull2010). Regardless of how informative, this is nevertheless still an introspective strategy which ignores much of the potential novel biology and therapeutic opportunity within the trypanosome.

It is estimated that up to 50% of the trypanosome protein-coding content is ‘divergent’, in the sense that orthology or paralogy with higher eukaryote genes cannot be reliably established, opening up the potential for novel and trypanosome-specific functions. For example, the trypanosome kinase families seemingly appear highly divergent from higher eukaryotes, with few conserved domain architectures beyond the kinase domains themselves, making functional prediction extremely difficult (Parsons et al. Reference Parsons, Worthey, Ward and Mottram2005). It is, however, very likely that this 50% of novel gene products is an overestimate, as many orthologous relationships are simply too divergent to be detected by sequence-based algorithms alone. As we have demonstrated previously, the nuclear pore complex is apparently highly divergent based on just in silico analysis, but is in fact rather well conserved and simply an example of BLAST failing to identify highly diverged sequences (deGrasse et al. Reference DeGrasse, DuBois, Devos, Siegel, Sali, Field, Rout and Chait2009). Thus, targeted proteomic analyses have a major role to play in this regard, as subcellular organelles, macromolecular structures and complexes can be isolated, using evolutionarily conserved handles, i.e. tagged proteins that are sufficiently well conserved for function to be confidently inferred, and potentially less well conserved proteins that are in association can be identified. This has the strategic advantage of finding genuinely trypanosome-specific proteins but which interact with known proteins. At a minimum, evidence for a likely role in a specific process or pathway is already available for the new protein, facilitating the design of strategies to test these hypotheses directly.

The quality of a proteome, and its ultimate utility, rests on sample preparation, and the rather difficult determination or definition of purity (Fig. 1 and legend). There are many strategies for preparing material for mass spectrometric analysis, ranging from whole cell extracts to more specific protein complexes, but in practice the issues remain similar; defining the material being analysed, being aware that there are likely contaminants and validating the proteins that are identified. Given that many complexes are known that participate in multiple interactions, the determination of specificity in itself is a very crucial step.

Fig. 1.

Considerations for proteomics. Schematics to illustrate some of the conceptual and technical challenges that need to be addressed or considered when analyzing the protein composition of a cell, organelle or complex. Panel A: Much difficulty can lie in the selection of appropriate gating parameters, with the significant issue that, ab initio, it is almost impossible to know where these parameters should be set. An initial estimate may be gleaned from prior art or scouring the genome sequence for clues, but this can remain a very inaccurate process and is full of assumptions. In the examples, the gating is used to either stringently eliminate >95% of the experimentally detected proteome (left), to reject >70% as a moderate cut-off (centre) or to allow into consideration essentially all of the proteome (right). Depending on the question, the nature of the sample, the quality of the data and the quality of the available predicted proteome database (genome) a gate approximating one (or none) of these possibilities may be appropriate. Obviously, more stringent gating reduces the number of proteins to consider going forward but will, in all probability, exclude important information. Panel B: Most proteins participate in a range of interactions, some of which are direct, while others are indirect. Conceptually one can consider a core of tight associations mediating the basic function of a given protein or complex (core, in red). However, this is biologically inaccurate as even tight complexes, organelles or other biological assemblies exist in association with other complexes and systems. These interactions become functionally as well as physically more tenuous and will eventually come to include proteins that are off target but which may still retain a genuine affinity for components of the target complex/organelle (light grey and blue). In some cases a given protein may be a bona fide member of several complexes; Sec13 in S. cerevisiae is now known to participate in at least three complexes, COPII, the NPC and the SEA complex. The point at which one considers such interactions to represent contaminants is hard to determine and, to some level, is subjective. Panel C: Considerations for the analysis of complex mixtures. Regardless of the appropriateness or not of the gating algorithm used, any initial list of proteins will contain a mixture of genuine components (‘realerons’, red), together with additional moderate or low probability members of the complex/organelle (‘mysterons’, black); probability here equates to additional evidence for membership to a complex. The biological sample will also contain contaminants, which are frequently impossible to exclude, as well as miscalls due to low signals, errors in the predictive algorithms, suppression and database quality problems. All of these criteria are variable (and difficult to quantify, hence ‘mysteron’ or even spectrum of ‘mysterons’) in terms of gating and hence any proteome is best considered as ‘a’ proteome for a complex or organelle, rather than definitively ‘the’ proteome. Panel D: Methods and approaches for validation of identified candidates. The top system encompasses in silico methods, primarily designed to discriminate based on known location and function from other studies; again, some of these assignments may be very high confidence and others much less so. The lower system includes examples of direct experimental approaches, including validation of the interaction itself by independent methods. The critical point here is that without information from these final validation steps, it is frequently difficult to have confidence in a proteome. Regrettably, this is also the most expensive part of the process in terms of time, resources and labour.

One approach we have found to be highly successful has been analysis of the trypanosome nuclear envelope. Using as starting material a highly enriched pore complex lamina fraction (Rout and Field, Reference Rout and Field2001), we were able to identify ∼800 distinct polypeptides, amounting to 10% of the predicted T. brucei proteome (DeGrasse et al. Reference DeGrasse, DuBois, Devos, Siegel, Sali, Field, Rout and Chait2009). A recent innovation, pioneered by one of us, is the isolation of protein complexes using a cryogrinding method that was originally developed to facilitate the lysis of Saccharmoyces cerevisiae cells due to the presence of a cell wall that does not dissolve in mild detergents. We have successfully adapted this method to trypanosomes and demonstrated its usefulness using the NPC as a test-bed, as well as to elements of the nuclear skeleton/lamina and, more recently, cytoplasmic complexes. Although still at the development phase, the methodology promises to be generally applicable to trypanosomes (and maybe other protists), with the potental to allow the elucidation of protein-protein interactions in T. brucei in a systematic manner (data not shown).

Here we briefly consider two major cellular systems of trypanosomes, the endocytic apparatus and the nuclear envelope (Fig. 2). Both of these systems are essential, possess numerous diverse functions and are likely contribute in unique ways to the biology of trypanosomes. We will also briefly discuss several approaches to the generation of biological samples for proteomics and some advantages and disadvantages of each.

Fig. 2.

Organelle and systems targets for proteomics in African trypanosomes. Top: The flagellar pocket and the endocytic system. At left is a schematic of the organelle, showing the flagellum, pocket collar (red) and transport vesicles. At right are a number of considerations for study of the flagellar pocket and the endocytic system in particular. Lower: Nuclear envelope and associated structures. At left is a schematic of a partial nucleus. In dark grey are filaments that likely participate in maintaining the structure of the nucleus, while heterochromatin is represented as shaded areas. Nuclear pore complexes are shown in red. At right are specific considerations for study of the nuclear envelope. In bold are aspects that are particularly relevant, in terms of either novelty or lack of exploration, to the African trypanosomes.

DEFINING A CLATHRIN INTERACTOME – CLASSICAL ANTIBODY PULLOUT

Based on primary structure-based searches, membrane transport in T. brucei apparently lacks multiple major factors found in other species that are known to play important roles in transport (discussed in Field and Carrington, 2005). These apparent absences result in an ‘incomplete’, and paradoxically non-functional, predicted protein network with many of the trypanosome endocytic protein orthologues lacking identifiable binding partners (see Field et al. Reference Field, Lumb, Adung'a, Jones and Engstler2009). As the endocytic system clearly is functional, this observation implies either that many critical players are too divergent to be detected by sequence alone or that truly novel proteins substitute for these factors. To some extent, both of these possibilities have the same consequences and highly divergent proteins are predicted to be operating within the trafficking machinery of trypanosomes.

All endocytosis in trypanosomes proceeds via the flagellar pocket, a membrane invagination surrounding the base of the flagellum and uniquely excluded from the subpellicular microtubule array subtending the bulk of the plasma membrane. The parasite surface is dominated by the GPI-anchored VSG, and endocytosis operates at an extremely rapid rate in the bloodstream stage of the parasite (Pal et al. Reference Pal, Hall, Jeffries and Field2003; Engstler et al. Reference Engstler, Thilo, Weise, Grünfelder, Schwarz, Boshart and Overath2004). Furthermore, all endocytosis appears to be clathrin-mediated, as RNAi against clathrin completely blocks endocytic activity (Allen et al. Reference Allen, Goulding and Field2003), and many of the proteins that mediate clathrin-independent endocytosis are restricted to metazoan taxa and therefore absent from trypanosomatids and in fact the majority of organisms (Field et al. Reference Field, Gabernet-Castello and Dacks2007). In addition, the AP-2 complex, which mediates recognition of cargo and their concentration in clathrin-coated pits is absent from T. brucei, and the major trans-membrane domain endocytic cargo, the invariant surface glycoproteins 65 and 75, both lack classical AP-based sorting signals and are internalized and degraded via a ubiquitylation-based mechanism (Chung et al. Reference Chung, Carrington and Field2004, Reference Chung, Leung, Carrington and Field2008; Leung et al. Reference Leung, Riley, Carrington and Field2011). We have also described a putative clathrin-associated sorting protein (CLASP), TbEpsinR, which is clearly required for internalization of surface proteins (Gabernet-Castello et al. Reference Gabernet-Castello, Dacks and Field2009), a second, TbAP180, that is currently under study (MCF and P. Manna, unpublished data) and a conserved protein RME-8 which is also a major player here (L. Koumandou and MCF, unpublished data). Finally, there is good evidence that endocytosis is dynamin-independent in bloodstream forms as RNAi against the single trypanosomal dynamin gene, TbDLP, has no impact on endocytic activity (Morgan et al. Reference Morgan, Goulding and Field2004). While evidence for a role in endocytosis in insect stages has been reported (Chanez et al. Reference Chanez, Hehl, Engstler and Schneider2006), recent studies from our group suggest that this endocytic defect could arise indirectly through an impact on the mitochondrion and ATP production, where TbDLP is clearly localized and likely functions (Morgan et al. Reference Morgan, Goulding and Field2004; Natesan et al. Reference Natesan, Peacock, Leung, Gibson and Field2010).

Overall, while providing some insights into how clathrin operates at the flagellar pocket and potentially elsewhere in the cell, the data above beg the question of if there are novel or trypanosome-specific factors that operate in the endomembrane system or if trypanosome endocytosis really does function with such a minimal composition? One solution to this question is to interrogate the clathrin interactome ab initio. Global approaches based on immuno-isolation have been reported for mammalian tissue culture cells (Borner et al. Reference Borner, Harbour, Hester, Lilley and Robinson2006), and have proved insightful, and therefore we asked if such an essentially unbiased approach could be applied to trypanosomes. We chose the bloodstream form parasite as this is the stage where clathrin is more abundant and where potentially relevant proteins may be expressed that are involved in the maintenance of the VSG coat (Morgan et al. Reference Morgan, Allen, Jeffries, Hollinshead and Field2001; Engstler et al. Reference Engstler, Pfohl, Herminghaus, Boshart, Wiegertjes, Heddergott and Overath2007; Field and Carrington, Reference Field and Carrington2009).

To isolate clathrin-interacting proteins from the bloodstream trypanosome, co-immunoprecipitation using rabbit anti-clathrin heavy chain antibody (TbCHC, Morgan et al. Reference Morgan, Allen, Jeffries, Hollinshead and Field2001) was performed. Subsequently, the isolated complexes were resolved by electrophoresis, silver-stained and the protein bands subjected to MS/MS for identification (Fig. 3). Besides TbCHC, more than twenty distinct proteins were identified in these pullouts, many of which appear to be novel and trypanosome specific (VOA and MCF, unpublished data). While potentially providing insights to the endocytic system, this finding raises concerns that can only be addressed with detailed validation.

Fig. 3.

Identification of a trypanosome clathrin network. Panel A: Protein complex immuno-precipitated from BSF and PCF lysates (lane 3 and 4 respectively) using rabbit anti-TbCHC polyclonal antibody (RαTbCHC) was resolved on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Beads plus lysate (lane 1) or beads plus antibody alone (lane 2) were used as controls. Silver-staining indicated the presence of the ∼175 kDa TbCHC protein in the isolated complexes from BSF and PCF but not in the negative controls. Protein bands migrating above the antibody heavy chain (white arrow) were subjected to mass spectrometry and further investigated. Panel B: Cells expressing C-terminally hemagglutinin (HA) genomic-tagged versions of three candidate clathrin-interacting partners TbHsc70, TbCAP100 and TbCAP161 were generated and prepared for immunofluorescence microscopy. The HA-tagged proteins (green) co-localize with clathrin (red) in the region between the kinetoplast and nucleus, as demonstrated by DAPI (blue) staining for DNA. Panel C: Co-immunoprecipitation of HA-tagged proteins of the candidates was performed and the isolated complexes probed for clathrin by Western blotting. The antibodies used are mouse anti-FLAG (mαFLAG) and mouse anti-HA (mαHA).

The set of candidate clathrin-associating proteins (TbCAPs) includes the heat-shock protein 70 (TbHsc70) and two hypothetical proteins, TbCAP100 and TbCAP161 (Fig. 3). TbHsc70 is a well known clathrin-interacting protein from higher eukaryotes and is responsible for uncoating of clathrin triskelion cages from clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) (Rothnie et al. Reference Rothnie, Clarke, Kuzmic, Cameron and Smith2011); identification of this protein thus goes some way towards an indication that the analysis is valid. TbCAP100 is also present in the genomes of a wide range of eukaryotes and therefore represents an additional component of a potentially conserved core. By contrast, TbCAP161 is only found in trypanosomatids. HA genomic-tagged forms of TbHsc70, TbCAP100 and TbCAP161 localize between the kinetoplast and nucleus, the region that contains the vast majority of the endocytic and exocytic organelles (Brickman et al. Reference Brickman, Cook and Balber1995; Field and Carrington, Reference Field and Carrington2009). Reference Luz Ambrósio, Lee, Panigrahi, Nguyen, Cicarelli and GünzlAll three antigens demonstrate significant co-localization with clathrin (Fig. 3 and data not shown). These data suggest that, together with TbHsc70, TbCAP100 and TbCAP161 are potential members of a trypanosome clathrin interactome network. However, as the clathrin interactions likely span endocytosis, endocytic recycling and also post-Golgi complex sorting and transport, the precise functions of TbCAP100 and TbCAP161 cannot be inferred from location alone and more evidence is needed to clarify the roles of these proteins (Morgan et al. Reference Morgan, Allen, Jeffries, Hollinshead and Field2001; Grunfelder et al. Reference Grünfelder, Engstler, Weise, Schwarz, Stierhof, Morgan, Field and Overath2003). For further confirmation of clathrin interaction, the HA-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated from whole cell lysates and these precipitates demonstrated to also contain clathrin by Western analysis (Fig. 3). In summary, bi-directional co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization between TbHsc70, TbCAP100 and TbCAP161 with clathrin provides very strong evidence that TbHsc70, TbCAP100 and TbCAP161 are bona fide clathrin-binding proteins.

The highly significant finding here is that while TbHsc70 and TbCAP100 are clearly well conserved between trypanosomes and higher eukaryotes, TbCAP161 is lineage-specific and cannot be detected by homology searches beyond the Kinetoplastida (data not shown). A similar level of conserved and lineage-restricted interaction partners was described recently by us for trypanosome Rab11 (Gabernet-Castello et al. Reference Gabernet-Castello, Dubois, Nimmo and Field2011).

The major advantage of the direct antibody pullout is that it is minimally invasive with wild-type parasites being the target. The method is also highly accessible – any good polyclonal is a potential starting point, and little in the way of specialised equipment is required. Of course, the approach may fail to capture many associated proteins due to dissociation and the absence of a second affinity step can increase the incidence of off-target hits. In the present example, there was a requirement for lysis to provide access to the intracellular antigen using partial detergent solubilisation which is potentially disruptive. Finally, there is the significant issue that the antibody resource is finite, and it is (too) easy to consume significant amounts of antibody in such experiments.

THE NUCLEAR ENVELOPE – SUBCELLULAR FRACTIONATION

The nuclear envelope is a defining feature of eukaryotic cells, and serves to separate nuclear activities such as transcription and mRNA processing from translation. Trypanosome nuclei are conventional in that they possess electron-dense material at the nuclear periphery which is most probably heterochromatin, a recognisable nucleolus and a double bilayer nuclear envelope which is contiguous with the endoplasmic reticulum. The limited evidence to hand has suggested that trypanosomes have comparatively conventional systems for RNA and protein import and export, as well as at least one direct study that demonstrated a probable conventional protein import pathway (Marchetti et al. Reference Marchetti, Tschudi, Kwon, Wolin and Ullu2000). However, novel aspects are likely present, for example in mRNA transport, where RNA-recognition motif (RRM) domains appear sufficient to specify nuclear accumulation, likely by binding to a specific RNA (Cassola and Frasch, Reference Cassola and Frasch2009). Further, ultrastructural analysis of trypanosomes has indicated the presence of nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) that morphologically resemble those in opisthokont taxa (Rout and Field, Reference Rout and Field2001). The obvious importance of the NPC to mRNA export pathways is enhanced by the assumed absence of promoter control from expression of many protein-coding genes due to polycistronic transcription and the presence of a spliced leader at the 5′ end of mature coding mRNAs.

A problem similar to the identification of the endocytic protein network was initially presented for the analysis of the trypanosome nuclear envelope and specifically identification of NPC proteins (nucleoporins). Based on BLAST analyses very few nucleoporins could be identified or clear orthologous relationships derived which raised the possibility that the trypanosome NPC was genuinely highly divergent from metazoan and yeast NPCs (Mans et al. Reference Mans, Anantharaman, Aravind and Koonin2004). The opposing interpretation was that the NPC was in fact conserved, but that the nucleoporins were too divergent to be identified using sequence-based searches. In fact the success in identifying potential NPC orthologues was significantly poorer than for the endocytic network.

A solution has been to pursue a classical subcellular fractionation route, to produce a highly enriched pore complex lamina fraction, essentially the nuclear envelope following mild detergent extraction and again based on methods originally develped for S. cerevisiae (Rout and Field, Reference Rout and Field2001). Despite extensive validation of the pore complex lamina fraction by both immunochemistry and electron microscopy which suggested a comparatively simple fraction containing NPCs and some interconnecting fibres, over 800 distinct polypeptides could be identified by a combination of MS/MS and MALDI-MS approaches with varying degrees of confidence (deGrasse et al. Reference DeGrasse, Chait, Field and Rout2008, Reference DeGrasse, DuBois, Devos, Siegel, Sali, Field, Rout and Chait2009). This illustrates rather well an important and sobering point; despite careful monitoring of the purification and good evidence that the resulting material was comparatively homogenous, a surprisingly large proteome was uncovered, making the list of proteins identified difficult to discriminate from the cohort that might be identified from a highly impure or heterogenous sample. In part, this is because of the high sensitivity of current mass spectrometric techniques but, in the face of such complexity, some confidence in the starting material (e.g. a validation of purity) is highly valuable before committing to further analysis with such a dataset. Informatics analysis, based on the observation that secondary structure is better conserved than primary structure, allowed the identification of candidate nucleoporins and finally validation by localization following in situ genomic tagging (Oberholzer et al. Reference Oberholzer, Morand, Kunz and Seebeck2006; deGrasse et al. Reference DeGrasse, DuBois, Devos, Siegel, Sali, Field, Rout and Chait2009; deGrasse and Devos, Reference DeGrasse and Devos2010). The important biological outcome of this study was that the trypanosome NPC is substantially more conserved with metazoan and yeast NPCs than sequence searches had indicated with major implications for the timing of evolution of the nucleus and sub-nuclear structures. Furthermore, the present data suggest that the NPC is more conserved than the clathrin interactome, despite the poorer return from in silico studies.

The advantages of subcelluar fractination are clear – the target is defined to some degree and selected to be highly biologically relevant, but the study does require a more significant investment in the design and validation of the isolation method than a simple antibody-based immunoisolation. Some disadvantages are perhaps less obvious; surveying a subcellular fraction can be extremely challenging as the composition of the isolated material is likely to be highly complex. Studies of the plasma membrane, flagellum, pore complex lamina fraction and mitochondrial proteomes from trypanosomes have all revealed highly complex proteomes with the likelihood that much of this complexity is contaminants as well as putative novel components, making discrimination between these two categories vital (Broadhead et al. Reference Broadhead, Dawe, Farr, Griffiths, Hart, Portman, Shaw, Ginger, Gaskell, McKean and Gull2006; Bridges et al. Reference Bridges., Pitt, Hanrahan, Brennan, Voorheis, Herzyk, de Koning and Burchmore2008; Panigrahi et al. Reference Panigrahi, Ogata, Zíková, Anupama, Dalley, Acestor, Myler and Stuart2008; DeGrasse et al. Reference DeGrasse, DuBois, Devos, Siegel, Sali, Field, Rout and Chait2009; Oberholzer et al. Reference Oberholzer, Langousis, Nguyen, Saada, Shimogawa, Jonsson, Nguyen, Wohlschlelgel and Hill2011). These problems are, of course, all layered upon standard concerns with purity that derive from any subcellular fractionation study.

THE NUCLEAR PORE AND NUCLEOSKELETON COMPLEX – CRYOGRINDING

A fuller understanding of protein function requires identification and characterization of interaction partners as all proteins operate in the context of complexes and higher order structures, at least for part of their time. These interactions may be truly stable structures, at least on the seconds to minutes timescale, where examples include cytoskeletal elements and the NPC. More transient complexes are the clathrin triskelion cage and coatomer vesicle coats which assemble and disassemble on the seconds timescale. Examples of rapidly associating and dissociating relationships include small GTPase interactions with their constellation of effector molecules, which exhibit a range of binding affinities that vary from nanomolar to millimolar depending on both the interaction partner and the state of the complex (Will and Gallwitz, Reference Will and Gallwitz2001; Wu et al. 2007). Affinities for protein-protein interactions can vary over several orders of magnitude, and k_off rates likewise have a broad dynamic range, both of which can confound efforts to isolate intact complexes or reliable portions thereof. Immensely powerful though they are (see for example Panigrahi et al. Reference Panigrahi, Ernst, Domingo, Fleck, Salavati and Stuart2006), affinity methods including the TAP-tag approach which use a dual affinity tag to attempt to minimise non-specific or off-target associations, suffer greatly from the prolonged period required for the pullout protocol. While facilitating the isolation of stable complexes, this can lead to loss of genuine low affinity interactions, as well as increase non-specific binding. Criticisms of other approaches to map interactions, such as yeast two hybrids, have been well rehearsed in the literature. In vitro or in vivo methods that rely on co-expression of two tagged proteins, either in a homologous system or, for example, in reticulocyte lysates, can suffer from overexpression artefacts as well as frequently non-physiological conditions and, of course, are not directed at the identification of novel factors.

One approach that avoids many of these issues is affinity isolation subsequent to cryogrinding by virtue of its rapidity, elimination of chaotropes, detergents or other factors from the generation of the initial lysate. This method preserves complexes or dynamic systems at the time of harvest, preventing mixing of components and it also reduces problems due to proteases, phosphatases or other potential factors that could degrade the sample as it is captured in liquid nitrogen. Further, inhibitors can be added to resuspension buffers when thawing the cryogrindate and gentler buffer systems can be used that potentialy preserve complexes that are disrupted under conditions where one biochemically lyses cells with stronger or high concentration detergents or chaotropes.

The method will be published in full elsewhere but, in brief, exploits a geological ball mill for the generation of a grindate under essentially native conditions, followed by pullout of the protein handle, normally a genomically-tagged C-terminal GFP fusion protein, using anti-GFP antibodies coupled to magnetic beads, and resolution by 1D SDS-PAGE (Cristea et al. Reference Cristea, Williams, Chait and Rout2005; Oberholzer et al. Reference Oberholzer, Morand, Kunz and Seebeck2006; Oeffinger et al. Reference Oeffinger, Wei, Rogers, DeGrasse, Chait, Aitchison and Rout2007; Fig. 4). This method requires substantial quantities of starting material, but can allow the isolation of very high quality complexes. The use of large quantities of starting material also allows exploration of many buffer conditions in parallel. We have successfully used this technique to extensively explore protein-protein interactions within the NPC, as well as to demonstrate interactions between the very large coiled-coil nucleoskeletal protein NUP-1 and the NPC as well as additional coiled-coil proteins that are present within the nucleus (MPR, BTC, MCF and SO, unpublished data). We have also begun to successfully apply the method to several complexes involved in membrane trafficking pathways, including clathrin coats and the exocyst complex.

Fig. 4.

Principal approach behind cyrogrinding method for determining compositions of complexes. Trypanosomes are tagged at a single genomic locus with a GFP affinity handle, in frame with the gene of interest (GOI). The localization of the resulting fusion protein is checked by microscopy to ensure faithful targeting, in this case to the nuclear pore complex. The population is then expanded, cells frozen and then ground using a ball mill to produce a cryogrindate. From the grindate the affinity handle can be used to immunoisolate the protein of interest and associated proteins. This step requires careful assessment of buffer conditions to attain isolation of the complex with minimal background. Mass spectrometric characterization of the resulting proteome may be facilitated using 1D SDS PAGE.

While requiring an in situ-tagged gene as an affinity handle, this strategy has the advantage of permitting assembly of the handle into the native complex in a minimally invasive manner as the protein is expressed to normal levels and only one of the two copies in the diploid genome is modified. Remarkably, most proteins appear to tolerate addition of GFP to the C-terminus without major impact on cell viability or function, at least as assessed by proliferation and correct targeting of the tagged protein. Coupled to the near native conditions that can be used for lysis, efficient cryogenic entrapment of complexes and the speed of isolation which aids in recovery of low affinity interactions and minimises non-specific binding, we consider the method to be highly useful and with great potental. The major downside is the quantity of material curently required which limits the number of candidate proteins that can be considered. However, the insights that are emerging from this approach auger well for the future exploration of protein complexes in trypanosomes, and the potential identification of novel trypanosome-specific complex members and interactions.