Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T21:42:23.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biogeochemical formation of metalliferous laminations in surficial environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2021

Anicia Henne*
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 4072 Australia CSIRO Mineral Resources, Australian Resources Research Centre (ARRC), 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia
Dave Craw
Affiliation:
Geology Department, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
Jessica Hamilton
Affiliation:
Australian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton VIC 3168 Australia
Anat Paz
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 4072 Australia
Gemma Kerr
Affiliation:
Geology Department, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
David Paterson
Affiliation:
Australian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton VIC 3168 Australia
Jeremiah Shuster
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia CSIRO Land and Water, Environmental Contaminant Mitigation and Technologies, PMB2, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
Gordon Southam
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 4072 Australia
*
*Author for correspondence: Anicia Henne, Email: anicia.henne@csiro.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Finely laminated (cm–μm scale) metalliferous precipitates are widespread in the surficial environment, especially around mineral deposits and reflect biogeochemical processes that can pervade near-surface environments on a larger scale. Examples in this paper involve precipitates of the transition metals Fe, Cu and Mn with minor Co, Ni, V and Zn; the metalloids As and Sb; and authigenic Au. Mobility and re-precipitation are driven primarily by geochemical disequilibrium, especially with respect to pH and redox states, that arises from complex interactions between biological processes, geological processes, and variations in the surrounding environment. Different degrees of chemical disequilibrium arise on small spatial scales on time scales of days to millennia. Interactions between biota, waters and rocks in these small near-surface settings affect the biogeochemical environments. Sulfur- and iron-oxidising bacteria are common biogeochemical agents associated with sulfide-bearing lithologies, but localised reductive environments can also develop, leading to gradients in pH and redox state and differential metal mobility. In general, there is commonly a spatial separation of Fe-rich precipitates from those with Cu and Mn, and other transition metals also follow Cu and Mn rather than Fe. Metalloids As and Sb have a strong affinity for Fe under oxidising conditions, but not under more reducing conditions. However, complex biogeochemical parageneses of laminated metalliferous deposits preclude prediction of finer formation details. The textures, mineral species, and metal associations within these deposits are likely to be encountered in all facets of mineral deposit development: initial exploration activity of near-surface locations, mining of shallow portions of orebodies, especially supergene zones, and downstream environmental management with respect to discharging metalliferous waters.

Information

Type
Article - Frank Reith memorial issue
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Figure 0

Table 1. Summary of examples of laminated metal deposition from a range of aqueous environments over a range of time scales.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Laminated precipitates formed in laboratory-based biogeochemical weathering experiments. (a) General SEM view of ferrihydrite precipitate with dehydration cracks from sample preparation on a rock clast. (b) Cells of A. ferrooxidans on ferrihydrite precipitate. (c) Back-scattered electron image of a section through ferrihydrite precipitate coating the wall of a leaching column with trace fossils of A. ferrooxidans (yellow circles). (d) Back-scattered electron image of a section through laminated ferrihydrite precipitate with trace fossils of A. ferrooxidans (yellow circles and arrows) on a chalcopyrite clast. (e) XFM element-distribution maps for Fe and Cu of laminated ferrihydrite precipitate on the wall of the experimental vessel. Enhanced Cu deposition at bacterial trace fossils are indicated (white circles).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Laminated precipitates formed at historic mines. (a) SEM view of cemented tailings on a wood fragment; Waiuta orogenic gold mine, New Zealand. Laminated As-bearing Fe-oxyhydroxide precipitates (mid-grey) coat some of the clasts, with an outer layer of realgar (AsS; bright white) precipitate. (b) Magnified view of the same deposit as in (a), showing arsenolite crystals (As2O3) with overgrowths of hair-like realgar. (c) SEM view of As–Hg-bearing ferrihydrite cement in historic tailings from Macraes orogenic gold mine, New Zealand, in which Hg was used for gold extraction. The cement is laminated with differing proportions of As and different Hg contents are shown as brighter and darker layers. (d) Magnified view of the same deposit as in (c), showing precipitate lamina rich in schuetteite (Hg3[SO4]O2) and possibly preserved bacterial cells partially per-mineralised by schuetteite. Some of the smallest white dots are nanoparticulate liquid Hg droplets. (e) Photograph of laminated precipitates forming stalactites on the roof of an underground tunnel, Iron Mountain mine, California. (f) Photograph of laminated precipitates on the wall of the mine in (e).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. XFM element-distribution maps of a thin section through laminated mineral precipitates on a biofilm growing on a cobble downstream of the treated AMD at the Mt Chalmers Cu–Au mine, Australia. (a) General view of Cu contents in the laminated deposit. (b) Magnified view of the portion indicated in (a), showing relative concentrations of Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, S and As.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. SEM images of laminated secondary Sb minerals developed in an oxidised Au–As–Sb orogenic deposit, Otago Schist, New Zealand. (a) General view of contrasting redox minerals developed on primary stibnite (bottom), with secondary stibnite beneath Sb-bearing ferrihydrite and tripuhyite (FeAsO4). (b, c) Magnified view of secondary minerals in the redox gradient in (a), with secondary stibnite overgrowing secondary senarmontite crystals (Sb2O3). (d) Magnified view of secondary stibnite, showing a tubular morphology produced potentially by filamentous bacteria.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. XFM element-distribution maps of a thin section through a laminated vein formed during weathering of the Salobo IOCG deposit, Brazil. (a) Fe and Mn maps show the location of the vein (Mn rich) on the margin of oxidised rock (Fe rich). (b) Magnified view of the vein (as indicated in (a) showing laminae enriched in Mn and Cu. (c) Juxtaposed elemental sections through the vein, as indicated in (b).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Regions of interest from which Cu XANES spectra are extracted are numbered and highlighted in green, and are shown against a background map of Cu K-edge fluorescence intensity at 9.3 keV. A range of Cu(0), Cu(I) and Cu(II) standards are shown for comparison. (a) Spectra from the laminated vein and its substrate in saprolite from the Salobo mine (Fig. 5). (b) Spectra from the interior, inner and outer rim zones, and outer edge of the native copper sample from Mt Isa (Fig. 7).

Figure 7

Fig. 7. SEM images and XFM element-distribution maps of laminations observed in supergene samples from Mt Isa, Queensland, Australia. (a) Back-scattered electron image of a cross-section through Fe-oxyhydroxides in native-copper-bearing rocks organised in colloform textures. (b) Potential bacteria fossil remnant in Fe-oxyhydroxide with acicular texture. (c) Copper XFM map of laminated rims on a supergene native copper nugget. (d) Magnified view of the rim zone in (a), showing principal minerals. (e) Paired Cu and Fe XFM maps of rim layers. (f) Copper, Fe and As XFM maps of rim layers. The As map has high background from the mounting glass, which obscures a zone of As enrichment that follows the outer edge.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Lamination in an empty root channel in canga from Serra Norte, Brazil. (a) Photograph of a horizontal cross-section with laminations inside a root channel, with (b) corresponding iron distribution from XFM. (c) Back-scattered electron image of various Fe-oxyhydroxide bands in cavities and infilling cracks. (d) Back-scattered electron image of laminations composed of per-mineralised fossils and encrusted cells enveloped by partially Al-substituted goethite.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Layering on the margins of gold particles from the Otago Schist terrane, New Zealand. (a) Incident light view of laminated rim of a supergene gold nugget. (b) SEM view of layered crystalline gold on the margin of a supergene nugget. (c) Magnified view of crystalline gold laminations in (b). (d) Vermiform gold overgrowths on an alluvial gold particle close to the bedrock supergene source. (e) Magnified view of vermiform gold overgrowth in (d).

Figure 10

Fig. 10. XFM element-distribution maps showing laminations in a manganese nodule from the North Pacific Ocean floor. (a) General view of Mn distribution in a polished section through the nodule. (b) Magnified view of a strip through (a), showing Mn, Cu, Fe and Ni distributions in a combination of primary laminations and secondary (diagenetic) layers that truncate the primary laminae and locally obscure them. (c) XFM element-distribution maps showing a detailed view of primary metallic laminations of Mn, Cu, Fe, Co, Ni, Ti and Zn in an individual protrusion.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Eh–pH diagrams (from Geochemist's Workbench, Bethke and Yeakel, 2016) showing redox relationships for Fe species in surficial environments. Heavy arrows indicate typical environmental fluctuations that lead to laminated precipitates. (a) Simple system with equilibrium lines for reaction 4 (in text) for a range of dissolved Fe2+. (b) A high-sulfate system depicting fluctuations in AMD environments.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Geochemical models (from Geochemist's Workbench) showing relationships between dissolved metals and precipitates. Heavy arrows indicate typical environmental variations across equilibrium boundaries that lead to laminated precipitates. (a) Comparisons of solubility of Cu with Fe and Mn in oxidised environments (Eh = 0.7 V). Relative solubilities of Cu and Mn under more reducing conditions (Eh = 0.4 V) are indicated. (b) Eh–pH diagram for Cu. (c) Comparison of solubility of Cu with Zn and Fe in oxidised environments (Eh = 0.7 V). (d) Eh–pH diagram for Sb (for example in Fig. 4a–d).

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Eh–pH diagrams (from Geochemist's Workbench) showing redox relationships for: (a) As (for example in Fig. 2a,b); (b) Hg (for example in Fig. 2c,d); and (c) Au (for example in Fig. 9). Heavy arrows indicate typical environmental variations across equilibrium boundaries that lead to laminated precipitates.