Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T01:41:15.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design and analysis of UWB antenna with quintuple band-notched and wide-band rejection characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2022

Hailong Yang*
Affiliation:
Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, China Control Science and Engineering from the Xi'an Research Institute of High-Tech, Xi'an 10024, China
Jinsheng Zhang
Affiliation:
Control Science and Engineering from the Xi'an Research Institute of High-Tech, Xi'an 10024, China
Xuping Li
Affiliation:
Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, China
Yapeng Li
Affiliation:
Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, China
Junhua Yang
Affiliation:
Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, China
Xiaomin Shi
Affiliation:
Communication Engineering Department, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an, China
*
Author for correspondence: Hailong Yang, E-mail: yanghl68@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, a compact ultra-wideband (UWB) antenna with quintuple band-notched and wide-band rejection characteristics is studied. The proposed antenna mainly consists of a rectangular radiating patch, a microstrip feeding line, and a modified rectangular ground plane. The quintuple band-notched functions with narrow stop bands are achieved at WiMAX (3.3–3.7 GHz), WLAN (5.15–5.35 GHz and 5.725–5.825 GHz), C-band IEEE INSAT/super-extended (6.7–7.1 GHz) by using three modified inverted U-shaped slots and two symmetrical rectangular slots on the radiating path. Each stop band formed in the UWB antenna can be adjusted independently, and deep reflection zeros are formed between the adjacent stop bands. The formation of reflection zeros improves the band-edge selectivity of the stop band, and the notch characteristics are more prominent. To further study the wide stop band (C-band and X-band) with good selectivity characteristics, a pair of L-shaped open slot is added to the edges of two rectangular slots. Additionally, a pair of modified Rho-shaped resonators is located near the feeding line to realize band-notched characteristic at ITU service bands (8.025–8.4 GHz), thus a quintuple band-notched UWB antenna is achieved. The shape factor (ratio of the −3 dB bandwidth to the −10 dB bandwidth) of the wide stop band is 0.56, which indicates that the antenna has excellent band-edge selectivity. To verify the performance of the proposed design, both the time-domain and the frequency-domain characteristics of the antenna have been studied and analyzed. The simulated and measured results verify the design as a good candidate for various portable UWB applications.

Information

Type
Antenna Design, Modeling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geometry of the quintuple band-notched UWB antenna. (a) Top patch of the presented antenna; (b) bottom patch of the presented antenna; (c) geometry of the inverted U-shaped slots.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The evolution of the quad and quintuple band-notched antennas. (a) Monopole antenna without notched ground plane; (b) monopole antenna with notched ground plane, UWB characteristics, and without any notched bands; (c) UWB antenna with two rectangular slots; (d) UWB antenna with three inverted U-shaped slots; (e) UWB antenna with quad band-notched characteristics; (f) UWB antenna with quintuple band-notched characteristics.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Simulated reflection coefficient for the six antennas shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. The reflection coefficient of the antenna in Fig. 2(b) with a rectangular slot of different length.

Figure 4

Table 1. Final dimensions of the proposed design

Figure 5

Fig. 5. The rectangular slot and L-shaped slot lengths on wide band-notched frequencies at C-band and X-band. (a) Changing L2 and L3, (b) fixing L2 and changing L3.

Figure 6

Table 2. The calculated correlation factors of three configurations in different cases

Figure 7

Fig. 6. The inverted U-shaped slot length and width effect on notched frequencies. (a) The slot length effect on the center frequency of WiMAX band by changing L9. (b) The slot length effect on the center frequency of lower WLAN band by changing L10. (c)The slot length effect on the center frequency of higher WLAN band by changing L11. (d) The slot width effect on the bandwidth of WiMAX band by changing W15.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. The equivalent-circuit model of the Rho- shaped resonator.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. The simulated return loss at ITU bands with different Rho-shaped size and distance from the feeding line. (a) Changing the size of Rho-shaped resonators by changing φ, (b) changing the distance from the feeding line by changing W7.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Photograph of the proposed antennas: (a) quad band-notched UWB antenna, (b) quintuple band-notched UWB antenna.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. (a) The measured and simulated return loss of the quad band-notched antenna. (b) The measured and simulated return loss of the quintuple band-notched antenna.

Figure 12

Table 3. Comparison of the achieved rejection bands and unwanted interference bands

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Simulated surface current distributions on the radiating patch of the presented antenna at the notched frequencies.

Figure 14

Fig. 12. The measured and simulated radiation patterns of the quintuple band-notched UWB antenna. (a) At 4 GHz, (b) at 6 GHz, (c) at 10 GHz.

Figure 15

Fig. 13. (a) Measured and simulated gain of the quintuple band-notched UWB antenna. (b) Measured and simulated radiation efficiency of the quintuple band-notched UWB antenna.

Figure 16

Fig. 14. Phase responses and group delay for two quintuple band-notched UWB antennas. (a) Measured group delay of two identical antennas with quintuple band-notched characteristics. (b) Measured phase S21 of two identical antennas with quintuple band-notched characteristics.

Figure 17

Table 4. Comparison of competitive reference antennas performance