Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:39:06.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are thermophilic microorganisms active in cold environments?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2014

Charles S. Cockell*
Affiliation:
UK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK Department of Physical Science, Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research, Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
Claire Cousins
Affiliation:
UK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK
Paul T. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Science, Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research, Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
Karen Olsson-Francis
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Science, Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research, Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
Ben Rozitis
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Science, Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research, Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mean air temperature of the Icelandic interior is below 10 °C. However, we have previously observed 16S rDNA sequences associated with thermophilic lineages in Icelandic basalts. Measurements of the temperatures of igneous rocks in Iceland showed that solar insolation of these low albedo substrates achieved a peak surface temperature of 44.5 °C. We isolated seven thermophilic Geobacillus species from basalt with optimal growth temperatures of ~65 °C. The minimum growth temperature of these organisms was ~36 °C, suggesting that they could be active in the rock environment. Basalt dissolution rates at 40 °C were increased in the presence of one of the isolates compared to abiotic controls, showing its potential to be involved in active biogeochemistry at environmental temperatures. These data raise the possibility of transient active thermophilic growth in macroclimatically cold rocky environments, implying that the biogeographical distribution of active thermophiles might be greater than previously understood. These data show that temperatures measured or predicted over large scales on a planet are not in themselves adequate to assess niches available to extremophiles at micron scales.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Table 1. Major element chemical composition of basalt used in the experiments

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Temperature profiles of Icelandic rocks and relative humidity. (a) Temperature at 2 cm depth for basalt [top] (4 July 2009–27 June 2010) and obsidian [middle] for 1 year (9 June 2007–11 June 2008). The horizontal dotted line show the minimum growth temperature for growth of thermophilic isolates obtained in this study. The relative humidity from 9 June 2007 to 27 June 2008 is also shown [bottom]. (b) The temperature profile of the surface of obsidian during 5 days in June (11–16) 2008.

Figure 2

Table 2. Thermophilic isolates. The 16S rDNA GenBank identification, closest sequence match, minimum and optimum growth temperatures of thermophilic organisms isolated from Icelandic basalt rock. ‘VBas’ refers to isolates from Hekla basalt. ‘Eyj’ refers to isolate obtained from ash at the Eyjafjallajökull

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Rock weathering by a thermophilic isolate. The pH and protein concentration in flasks. (a) pH changes. A, sterile control flask 40 °C; B, flask containing a thermophilic isolate at 40 °C; C, sterile control flask 60 °C; D, flask containing a thermophilic isolate at 60 °C. (b) Protein concentration of flasks containing the thermophilic isolate, no growth was observed in sterile control flasks.

Figure 4

Table 3. Elemental release induced by thermophilic isolates. The concentration (μM) of selected elements released into solution from powdered basalt after 45 days of incubation. Biological flasks contained a thermophilic isolate, whereas control flasks remained sterile. The experiment was run in triplicate. The standard deviation of replicate flasks is given in brackets. Student's t-test was performed to determine significance differences between biological flasks and sterile controls