Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:39:54.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The addition of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and antioxidants (glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase) in extenders to epididymal sperm cryopreservation in bulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2018

João D.A. Losano
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
Daniel S.R. Angrimani*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
Bruno R. Rui
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
Luana C. Bicudo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
Andressa Dalmazzo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
Bárbara C.S. Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
Carlos H.C. Viana
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
Camilla M. Mendes
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
Mayra E.O.A. Assumpção
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
Valquiria H. Barnabe
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
Marcilio Nichi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil
*
All correspondence to: Daniel S.R. Angrimani. Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87-05508-270, São Paulo, Brazil. Tel: +55 11 30917914. Fax: +55 11 30917914. E-mail: angrimani@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The cryopreservation of epididymal sperm is an important technique that allows genetic material to be preserved, even post mortem. However, cryopreservation leads to increased oxidative stress and impaired sperm viability. Polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation may improve certain sperm characteristics, but it also makes sperm more susceptible to oxidative stress, therefore adding antioxidants that counteract oxidative stress has become an option. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of the interaction between docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and antioxidants on the quality after the cryopreservation of epididymal bull sperm. Twenty epididymides were collected after slaughter, and epididymal sperm was cryopreserved with bovine extender supplemented with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). We verified an improvement in motility in the group that was treated only with DHA 5 µM and a concentration-dependent effect on susceptibility to lipid peroxidation that was associated with DHA concentration (1 µM, 5 µM or 10 µM). Moreover, treatment with DHA (5 µM) and SOD (20 IU/ml) resulted in higher sperm motility. Thus, the association between DHA (5 µM) and SOD (20 IU/ml) appears to be an option for increased epididymal sperm features in bulls.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Effect of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) concentration in the response variables motility (A) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) as susceptibility to oxidative stress index (B) in sperm collected from the bovine cauda epididymis and submitted to cryopreservation. a,bDifferent letters indicate statistical difference between treatments (LSD test; P < 0.05).

Figure 1

Table 1 Effect of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) concentration in the response variables motility, vigour, plasmatic and acrosomal membranes, mitochondrial activity (DAB I, II, III and IV) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) as susceptibility oxidative stress index in sperm collected from the bovine cauda epididymis and submitted to cryopreservation

Figure 2

Table 2 Effect of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) concentration associated with the antioxidants glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) combined or not, in the response variables motility, vigour, plasmatic and acrosomal membranes, mitochondrial activity (DAB I, II, III and IV) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) as susceptibility oxidative stress index in sperm collected from the bovine cauda epididymis and subjected to cryopreservation

Figure 3

Figure 2 Effect of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) concentration associated with the antioxidants glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) combined or not, in the response variables motility (B) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) (A) as susceptibility index of oxidative stress in sperm collected from the bovine cauda epididymis and subjected to cryopreservation. a,bDifferent letters indicate statistical difference between treatments (LSD test; P < 0.05).