Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:08:39.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3D-printed β-TCP bone tissue engineering scaffolds: Effects of chemistry on in vivo biological properties in a rabbit tibia model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2018

Samit Kumar Nandi
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Kolkata 700037, West Bengal, India
Gary Fielding
Affiliation:
W. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2920, USA
Dishary Banerjee
Affiliation:
W. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2920, USA
Amit Bandyopadhyay
Affiliation:
W. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2920, USA
Susmita Bose*
Affiliation:
W. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2920, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: sbose@wsu.edu

Abstract

In this study, the effects of 3D-printed SiO2 and ZnO-doped tricalcium phosphate (TCP) scaffolds with interconnected pores were evaluated on the in vivo bone formation and healing properties of a rabbit tibial defect model. Pure and doped TCP scaffolds were fabricated by a ceramic powder-based 3D printing technique and implanted into critical sized rabbit tibial defects for up to 4 months. In vivo bone regeneration was evaluated using chronological radiological examination, histological evaluations, SEM micrographs, and fluorochrome labeling studies. Radiograph results showed that Si/Zn-doped samples had slower degradation kinetics than the pure TCP samples. 3D printing of TCP scaffolds improved bone formation. The addition of dopants in the TCP scaffolds improved osteogenic capabilities when compared to the pure scaffolds. In summary, our findings indicate that the addition of dopants to the TCP scaffolds enhanced bone formation and in turn leading to accelerated healing.

Information

Type
Invited Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Schematic drawing representing the powder bed 3D printing process. (b) Photo showing fully processed green scaffolds (bottom: nondepowderized; top: depowderized), Square channels are oriented 0°/90° for subsequent layers.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Photograph showing (a) exposure of proximal tibia and (b) placement of the implant in critical sized bone defect.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Surface morphology of sintered scaffolds of (a–c) pure TCP scaffold at different magnifications and (d) SiO2/ZnO-doped scaffold depicting more liquid phase sintering evident from the glassy phase.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Histological images depicting scaffolds implanted in the proximal tibia over the course of 120 days (a) TCP-2 months (1. Haversian canal, 2. Lacunae, and 3. Osteoblast); (b) Doped TCP-2 months (1. Haversian canal, 2. Lacunae, and 3. Angiogenesis); (c) TCP-4 months (1. Haversian canal, 2. Lacunae, and 3. Osteoblast); (d) Doped TCP-4 months (1. Haversian canal, 2. Lacunae, and 3. Angiogenesis).

Figure 4

FIG. 5. SEM images of implanted pure TCP (a and b) and SiO2/ZnO doped scaffolds (c and d) evaluated at 2 and 4 months after implantation. Insets show an increased magnification focusing on tissue ingrowth characteristics into the pores.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. X-ray images depicting scaffolds implanted in the proximal tibia over the course of 120 days.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Fluorochrome labeling images depicting scaffolds implanted in the proximal tibia over the course of 120 days. (a) TCP 2 months, (b) doped TCP 2 months, (c) TCP 4 months, and (d) doped TCP 4 months. Areas marked with numbers depict the different osseous tissue zones (1. Golden yellow fluorescence-new bone and 2. Sea-green fluorescence-old bone). (e) and (f) show percentage old and new bone formation calculated from fluorochrome labeled micrographs using GIMP. ** depicts extremely significant statistical relevance performed using Students’ paired t tests (P values <0.0001) and * depicts significant relevance performed by Students’ paired t-test as well (P value <0.05).