Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T02:06:42.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Missing Girls or Hidden Girls? A Comment on Shi and Kennedy's “Delayed Registration and Identifying the ‘Missing Girls’ in China”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2017

Yong Cai*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Email: caiyong@unc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent article published in this journal, Yaojiang Shi and John Kennedy suggest that China's missing girls problem is much more a statistical artefact than previously known. According to their analysis, unreported female births, or hidden girls, account for 73 per cent of the 15 million missing girls from the 1990–2010 birth cohorts in the 2010 census. Their conclusion is based in part on their fieldwork, but the numerical estimate is grounded on their understanding and analyses of Chinese census data. While the insights from their fieldwork – that China's political system leaves ample room for data manipulation and delayed registration – cannot be faulted, Shi and Kennedy's analyses of Chinese census data are questionable and their conclusion is in contradiction with the “missing girls” shown in other data sources. In this short note, I present three lines of evidence to challenge Shi and Kennedy's conclusion: one from the censuses, one from official education statistics, and one from survey data. For the sake of clarity, I use two terms to describe missing girls: nominal missing – the number of missing girls as revealed by population statistics, and truly missing – the number of missing girls excluding those hidden (unreported) girls. My conclusion backs the conventional wisdom about the missing girls phenomenon in China: the elevated sex ratios in Chinese population, or “missing girls,” is not a statistical artefact, but a real social challenge that China has to face for now and for the foreseeable future.

Information

Type
Duihua Academic Exchange
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1: Observed and Expected Sex Ratio by Birth Cohort in Chinese Censuses

Note:1. Data include military personnel. All military personnel in the age category 17 or younger are treated as 17.2. Birth cohort is based on age reported in the censuses. Because the four censuses use different standard time (1st Nov for 2000 and 2010, and 1st July for 1982 and 1990), linear interpolation is used to line up all the four censuses to 1st Nov.3. Expected sex ratio at the 2010 census is constructed using Coale and Demeny's Model Life Table (Model West), by interpolating two sets of model population sex ratio (levels 21 and 24), starting with sex ratio at birth at 105.4. “Shi and Kennedy” is calculated by adding 550,000 girls to each birth cohort.
Figure 1

Figure 2: Sex Ratio by Reporting Year and Birth Cohort in Primary Schools, China 1989–2015

Data Sources:Ministry of Education. 1989–2015. Educational Statistics Yearbook of China.