Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:06:55.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The origin of the c. 1.7 Ga gabbroic intrusion in the Hekou area, SW China: constraints from SIMS U–Pb zircon geochronology and elemental and Nd isotopic geochemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

WEI-GUANG ZHU*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 99 West Lincheng Road, Guiyang 550081, China
ZHONG-JIE BAI
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 99 West Lincheng Road, Guiyang 550081, China
HONG ZHONG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 99 West Lincheng Road, Guiyang 550081, China
XIAN-TAO YE
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 99 West Lincheng Road, Guiyang 550081, China
HONG-PENG FAN
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 99 West Lincheng Road, Guiyang 550081, China
*
*Author for correspondence: zhuweiguang@vip.gyig.ac.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The late Palaeoproterozoic to early Mesoproterozoic igneous rocks of southwestern China are characterized by a number of mafic intrusions and dykes. However, the origin and tectonic implications of these mafic intrusions and dykes remain unclear. The Hekou mafic intrusion, intruding into the Hekou Group in the Hekou area, SW China, is the biggest and most representative one. The intrusion is mainly composed of coarse-grained in the central zone (CZ) and medium- to fine-grained gabbroic rocks in the outer zone (OZ). Cameca secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) U–Pb zircon ages, and geochemical and Nd isotopic results for the intrusion are reported in this paper. SIMS U–Pb zircon ages indicate that the gabbroic rocks from the CZ and OZ were emplaced at 1735±6.5 Ma and 1736±4.0 Ma, respectively. This suggests that the Hekou intrusion originated from c. 1.7 Ga mafic magmatism in the southwestern Yangtze Block. The coarse-grained rocks in the CZ of the intrusion show fairly homogeneous major- and trace-element compositions. In contrast, the medium- to fine-grained rocks from the OZ display slightly evolved compositions, with relatively lower Mg nos, MgO, Al2O3, Cr and Ni contents, and higher SiO2, CaO and Zr concentrations than those of the rocks from the CZ. Although the gabbroic rocks of the intrusion have low total rare earth element (REE) contents (REE = 29.3–40.2 ppm) with slightly light REE (LREE)-enriched and heavy REE (HREE)-depleted patterns, they exhibit distinct trace-element and Nd isotopic features. The rocks from the CZ are characterized by slightly LREE-enriched and ‘convex upwards’ incompatible trace-element patterns with significant Th depletion and insignificant Nb and Ta depletion relative to La. However, the rocks from the OZ have relatively flatter REE patterns than those of the rocks from the CZ. In addition, the rocks from the OZ are slightly enriched in Th and depleted in Nb and Ta relative to La. The εNd(T) values of the CZ and the OZ rocks are +0.70 to +2.3 and −0.30 to +0.24, respectively. The parental magma for the Hekou gabbroic intrusion exhibits affinity with a subalkaline basaltic magma, which was possibly generated by relatively high degrees of partial melting of a slightly depleted asthenospheric mantle source. Their geochemical and isotopic variations were due to slight crystal fractionation with varying degrees of crustal contamination. The Hekou intrusion was therefore supposed to form in an anorogenic extensional environment. It is further suggested that c. 1.7 Ga is an important onset timing of widespread anorogenic magmatism in the southwestern Yangtze Block. We interpret the late Palaeoproterozoic gabbroic intrusion to represent anorogenic mafic magmatism, which was most likely related to the break-up of the Columbia supercontinent.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Simplified tectonic map showing the study area in relation to South China's major tectonic units (Li et al.2007). Numbers 1–4 indicate the Kongling Complex, the Dahongshan Group, the Tianli schists and the Kunyang–Dongchuan groups, respectively; (b) geological map of the late Palaeo- to Mesoproterozoic strata and Proterozoic intrusions in the Kangdian region, SW China (modified from Wu et al.1990; Zhao & Zhou, 2011).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) A simplified geologic map of the Hekou area, Sichuan Province, SW China; (b) a simplified stratigraphic column of the Hekou Group. Modified from the Chinese Huili 1:200000 geological map (SBG, 1967).

Figure 2

Table 1. Cameca SIMS U–Pb zircon isotopic analyses for the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion, SW China

Figure 3

Figure 3. Representative CL images of zircons from (a) sample HK1003 from the CZ; and (b) sample HK1007 from the OZ of the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion.

Figure 4

Figure 4. SIMS U–Pb Concordia diagrams of (a) sample HK1003 from the CZ; and (b) sample HK1007 from the OZ of the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion.

Figure 5

Table 2. Major-element (in wt%) and trace-element (in ppm) data for the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion

Figure 6

Figure 5. Diagrams of Y, Nb, Th, La, V, Sr, Pb, Rb and Ba v. Zr to evaluate the mobility of these elements in the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion during alteration. Solid round symbols – the central zone (CZ) of the gabbroic intrusion; Open round symbols – the outer zone (OZ) of the gabbroic intrusion.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Fenner diagrams for the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion. Symbols as in Figure 5.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Rock classification plot of SiO2 v. (Na2O + K2O) (Cox, Bell & Pankhurst, 1979) for the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion. Symbols as in Figure 5.

Figure 9

Figure 8. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns; and (b) primitive-mantle normalized incompatible trace-element multi-element plot for the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion. The normalization values of chondrite are from Boynton (1984). The normalization values of primitive mantle are from Sun & McDonough (1989). Symbols as in Figure 5. OIB – ocean island basalt; E-MORB – enriched mid-ocean ridge basalt; N-MORB – normal mid-ocean ridge basalt.

Figure 10

Table 3. Sm–Nd isotopic compositions for the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion

Figure 11

Figure 9. Plots of (a) εNd(T) v. Nb/La; (b) Nb/Th v. Nb/La; and (c) (Th/Ta)PM v. (La/Ta)PM (Ingle et al. 2002) for the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion. Symbols as in Figure 5. UCC – upper continental crust; LCC – lower continental crust.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Discrimination diagram of AlZ (percentage of tetrahedral sites occupied by Al) v. TiO2 in clinopyroxenes (Loucks, 1990) for the gabbroic rocks from the Hekou intrusion. Symbols as in Figure 5.

Supplementary material: File

Zhu supplementary material S1

Appendix

Download Zhu supplementary material S1(File)
File 228.4 KB