Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T17:17:07.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health Care Student Perceptions of Societal Vulnerability to Disasters in the Context of Population Aging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2018

Peter Lucas Open the ORCID record for Peter Lucas [Opens in a new window] ,
Michael Annear ,
Wayne Harris ,
Helen Eyles  and
Auston Rotheram
Peter Lucas*
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania, Australia
Michael Annear
Affiliation:
International Christian University, Tokyo, Japan
Wayne Harris
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania, Australia
Helen Eyles
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania, Australia
Auston Rotheram
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania, Australia
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Peter Lucas, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia (e-mail: p.v.lucas@utas.edu.au).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This paper reports on undergraduate health care students’ perception of societal vulnerability to disasters in the context of population aging. Forecast increases in extreme weather events are likely to have a particularly devastating effect on older members of the community.

Methods

Undergraduate paramedicine and nursing students were surveyed using the Perceptions of Ageing and Disaster Vulnerability Scale (PADVS) to determine their views on the risks posed to older members of the community by disasters. Data analysis included a comparison of subscales relating to isolation, health system readiness, declining function, and community inclusiveness.

Results

Students reported a moderate level of concern about disaster vulnerability. Students who had previously completed another university degree reported significantly higher levels of concern than those without a prior degree. Australian students reported lower concern about societal vulnerability compared to a previously reported cohort of Japanese students.

Conclusion

Our study suggests current education of future health care students does not promote adequate levels of awareness of the health-related challenges posed by disasters, particularly among older members of the community. Without addressing this gap in education, the risk of negative outcomes for both unprepared first responders and older members of the community is significant. (Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019;13:449-455)

Keywords

disastersextreme weather eventshealth care studentspopulation agingvulnerability

Information

Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 449 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 

Population aging is a defining demographic trend of the 21st century. Forecasts indicate that, by 2050, the global population of individuals aged 65 and over will reach 1.5 billion, more than double the 2015 figure. 1 In Australia, in 2016, 3.7 million people were aged 65 and over, and this forecast will increase to 8.7 million by 2056. 2 Of this aging population, the oldest-old cohort, those 85 years and older, is increasing most rapidly. 1 , 3 By 2046, it is projected that there will be 1.4 million people aged 85 and over, 2 and, by 2061, those 85 years and older will account for 5% of Australia’s population. 4 The rapid growth in the 85 years and older cohort has significant consequences for health practitioners across diverse disciplines because advancing age is associated with chronic multimorbidities and geriatric syndromes,Reference Strandberg, Pitkälä and Tilvis 5 including frailty, sarcopenia, functional decline, and cognitive impairment such as dementia.Reference Arendts and Lowthian 6 - Reference Lowthian, Jolley and Curtis 8

Paramedic service providers are increasingly challenged by the effects of an aging population through increased demand for community callouts, more complicated emergency department attendance processes, and transfers between long-term care facilities and hospitals.Reference Chilton 9 , Reference Lowthian, Curtis and Stoelwinder 10 In Australia, increasing demand for paramedic services by persons aged over 85 has been identified as a significant health care workforce issue.Reference Lowthian, Jolley and Curtis 8 This increased demand is associated with a range of factors, including reduced access to primary health care services, particularly among rural and regional older adults, and lack of family and community support for aging in place.Reference Lowthian, Jolley and Curtis 8

While an aging population is inevitable in developed countries such as Australia, it need not be the so-called burden on the health sector and taxpayer as is often portrayed in the media.Reference Lundgren and Ljuslinder 11 , Reference Martin, Williams and O’Neill 12 In many instances, older adults contribute significantly to family and community. For example, recent research showed that older adults were central to community recovery efforts in the aftermath of disasters. 13 , Reference Annear, Keeling and Wilkinson 14 Older adults have been found to mobilize and generate social capital to aid recovery efforts, and their wisdom, resilience, and resources have proven effective in assisting vulnerable community members.Reference Howard, Blakemore and Bevis 15 - Reference Brockie and Miller 17 At the same time, however, vulnerable older persons are also recognized as being at greater risk of harm during and after disasters and suffer greater morbidity and mortality than younger persons. 13 , Reference Tuohy, Stephens and Johnston 18 Typically, this is due to the prevalence of one or more geriatric syndromes and lack of immediate disaster relief and caregiver assistance.Reference Flanagan, Gregory and Hallisey 19 The World Health Organization asserts that the occurrence of more disasters in an aging world means more older persons are vulnerable. 13

Although the relationship between increasing extreme weather events and climate change remains politically contested,Reference Giddens 20 such events are forecasted to become more frequent, more intense, and longer lasting in the coming years.Reference Kovats and Hajat 21 , Reference Meehl and Tebaldi 22 These events are likely to have a particularly devastating effect on older members of the community.Reference Aldrich and Benson 23 In Australia, the 2009 Black Saturday fires in the state of Victoria resulted in 173 deathsReference Howard, Blakemore and Bevis 15 and the relocation of 7,000 people.Reference Parkinson and Zara 24 During the concomitant southeastern Australian heat wave event, in the state of Victoria, there was a 46% increase in ambulance callouts, whereas emergency department admissions of people over 75 years of age due to heat-related illness increased by 37%. Mortality increased by 62% during that event with the greatest increase among those ages 65 years and over.Reference Hughes, Hanna and Fenwick 25 Mortality rates due to extreme heat are thought to be underreported, however, because deaths are often recorded as exacerbations of pre-existing medical conditions.Reference Hughes, Hanna and Fenwick 25 , Reference Hajat and Kosatky 26 New Zealand research reported prevalent psychological problems among older adults in the aftermath of major earthquakes in that country.Reference Annear, Wilkinson and Keeling 27 Elsewhere, international research has identified that Alzheimer’s disease symptoms were exacerbated in the wake of a catastrophic natural disaster in Japan.Reference Furukawa, Ootsuki and Nitta 28 Approximately 71% of people who died as a result of Hurricane Katrina in the United States were aged 60 and over, and 47% were over 75; additionally, a significant number of older people were abandoned by carer staff in the aftermath of that disaster. 29 From a paramedic perspective, ambulance callouts, hospital transfers, and community mortality typically increase during disasters, and events such as the 2009 heat wave were considered to have exceeded the capacity of emergency services to cope.Reference Hughes, Hanna and Fenwick 25 , Reference Nitschke, Tucker and Hansen 30 Paramedic and other emergency services are typically at the forefront of a community’s disaster response.Reference Bissell, Becker and Burkle 31 , Reference Chaffee 32 Paramedic services have multiple roles in disaster management, including the coordination of resources, triage, acute clinical care, and transport and evacuation of survivors.Reference Kahn, Schultz, Miller and Anderson 33 - Reference Kilner 35 Because a significant proportion of disaster victims are frail older people living in diverse settings, paramedic services typically address the immediate health care needs of this demographic. 29 During the aftermath of a disaster, paramedics must be prepared for the challenges of managing people with a range of geriatric syndromes, including frailty and functional and cognitive decline.Reference Gamble, Hurley and Schultz 36 Additionally, acute care needs of frail, older adults do not subside in the aftermath of disasters and may even be exacerbated given the added stressors of the situation.Reference Fernandez, Byard and Lin 37

Older community members should be considered a distinct population with respect to vulnerability and disaster planning. There are multiple factors that contribute to older adults being more at risk of injury, illness, or death during and after a disaster.Reference Vandentorren, Bretin and Zeghnoun 38 , Reference Watts, Adger and Agnolucci 39 Older adults often inhabit structures that were constructed with obsolete materials, and residing in these older structures has been associated with a higher risk of death for occupants during extreme weather events.Reference Vandentorren, Bretin and Zeghnoun 38 , Reference Bright, Gilbert, Winskog and Byard 40 Reliance on community health and allied care services, such as meals on wheels or domestic support by older people prior to a disaster, has also been associated with a higher risk of death.Reference Vandentorren, Bretin and Zeghnoun 38 , Reference Dirkzwager, Grievink, Van der Velden and Yzermans 41 Issues of reduced mobility, which limits capacity for escape and evacuation, and the presence of comorbidities have also been shown to negatively influence health outcomes among older adults.Reference Vandentorren, Bretin and Zeghnoun 38 , Reference Cutter, Boruff and Shirley 42 Further, the reduced thermoregulatory and heat adaptation capacity of older adults poses additional risks in light of forecasts of more frequent and intense heat waves.Reference Coates, Haynes and O’Brien 43

Given the increasing regularity and severity of extreme weather events and the growing threat of natural disasters in the aging and urbanizing Asia-Pacific region, the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) has developed a National Strategy for Disaster Resilience, 44 and the Tasmanian Government developed the 2016 Tasmanian State Natural Disaster Risk Assessment.Reference White, Remenyi and McEvoy 45 These documents identify the importance of developing community resilience to better withstand the effects of natural disasters and highlight that a coordinated multi-agency and community-based approach are fundamental. The need for multi-agency responses in times of disaster is also recognized by the Council of Ambulance Authorities. Current Paramedic Professional Competency Standards require paramedics to demonstrate the requisite knowledge and skills to participate in mass casualty incidents, including a working knowledge of the application of emergency medicine in disaster situations. 46

In response to the National Strategy for Disaster Resilience calling for the inclusion of disaster risk reduction content in relevant higher education courses, this research seeks to establish a baseline measure of students’ current understanding of disaster vulnerability. Considering that paramedics play an essential community health care role involving regular interaction with an aging demographic,Reference Lowthian, Jolley and Curtis 8 students preparing for a career in paramedicine are ideally situated to offer perspectives about disaster preparedness and vulnerability of older adults in respect to disaster preparedness and community resilience. Student paramedics can also provide an objective perspective that sits outside of professional politics or potential biases. Although a component of paramedic education and training focuses on decision-making in the complex and dynamic environments that disasters generate,Reference Cone, Serra and Kurland 47 , Reference Wilkerson, Avstreih and Gruppen 48 it is unclear what proportion focuses on the care needs of older people during such times. This research surveyed undergraduate students undertaking a Bachelor of Paramedicine degree and a cohort of practicing paramedics undertaking a “conversion” degree to upgrade their qualifications to the bachelor’s level. A cohort of undergraduate nursing students was also surveyed to determine whether differences were evident across health care disciplines. The research used a validated instrument, the Perceptions of Ageing and Disaster Vulnerability Scale (PADVS), which had previously been administered to a cohort of Japanese health care students and educators.Reference Annear, Otani, Gao and Keeling 49 This study provides an opportunity to compare perspectives on disaster vulnerability across different cultures.

METHODS

Survey Tool Development

The PADVS was developed following a review of the extant literature in the topic areas of societal vulnerability, disasters, and aging. As part of an iterative process, feedback from academic experts in Australia, Japan, and New Zealand informed development and pretesting procedures.Reference Annear, Otani, Gao and Keeling 49 The PADVS was initially developed for use with a Japanese population, where the confluence of population aging and natural disasters is pronounced, although both English and Japanese versions have been pretested with health student populations. Prior to the present research, language translation (and back translation) of the instrument between English and Japanese was tested with no loss or alteration of meaning occurring.Reference Maneesriwongul and Dixon 50 The resulting instrument was validated with 172 health students, professionals, and academics. The PADVS showed a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach’s α – 0.87) and was found to provide a reliable and valid measure to assess perceptions of societal vulnerability to disasters in the context of population aging among those who work or train in health settings.Reference Annear, Otani, Gao and Keeling 49 As discussed by Annear et al,Reference Annear, Otani, Gao and Keeling 49 the PADVS may have limitations relating to subscale reliability between differing cultural and demographic groups. Those researchers recommended that international researchers administer the scale to assess its utility across different populations of health trainees and professionals as part of ongoing development and refinement. Given the potential application of this scale to health science students, our study administered the scale to better understand its utility in the Australasian context as well as to elicit potentially useful baseline data.

The PADVS comprises 13 items, which are each scored from 0 to 5, based on respondents’ perceptions of age-related societal vulnerability. An exemplar statement from the measure (item 1) reads as follows: “Societal vulnerability to natural disasters is increased by the growing number of older adults in the community.” Respondents scored each of the 13 statements from “0” (no increase in vulnerability) to “5” (very high increase in vulnerability). Within the 13-item measure are four validated subscales, which reflect different issues associated with age-related and societal vulnerability to disasters: (1) isolation and access (4 items scored out of 20), (2) declining function (3 items scored out of 15), (3) community inclusiveness (3 items scored out of 15), and (4) health system and health worker readiness (3 items scored out of 15). Higher scores on the PADVS and each of the subscales indicate greater concerns among respondents regarding societal vulnerability.

Survey Administration

The 13-item English-language PADVS was administered electronically to 146 participants via e-mail invitation. The invitation included a link to an electronic version of the survey instrument between November 2016 and March 2017. Aligning with the aims of the research, the study sought participants who were studying community health education (paramedicine and nursing), where there was a strong focus on community care and the health needs of older adults. All students within undergraduate paramedic and nursing courses at a large public university were invited to complete the survey. Participation was voluntary, and consent for the use of aggregated data in reporting was inferred by submission of the online survey. Ethics approval for this research was obtained from an institutional Human Research Ethics Committee, No. H161669.

Data Analysis

All data analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS for Windows (version 23). Continuous data were initially screened for normality and the potential effects of outlier values, indicating the suitability of parametric tests of significance. An examination of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic returned a nonsignificant result (P=0.221), indicating that the data have a normal distribution. Further, the mean PADVS score (45.39) was very similar to the 5% trimmed mean (45.54), demonstrating negligible influence from extreme values. Descriptive statistics (percentages, frequencies, means, and standard deviations) were reported for the demographic characteristics and PADVS total scores. Analysis also included a comparison of the four validated subscales within the PADVS: (1) health system and health worker readiness, (2) declining function, (3) community inclusiveness, and (4) isolation and access. Tests of significance included the Pearson correlation and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Correlations were examined between the main outcome measure (total PADVS score) and the variables of age, gender, and prior education. An ANOVA was undertaken to assess potential differences in perceptions of disaster vulnerability among respondents from different student and occupational cohorts.

RESULTS

Research Participants

Three student cohorts comprising 87 Bachelor of Paramedicine, 42 Bachelor of Nursing, and 17 practicing paramedics undertaking a “conversion” degree to upgrade their existing qualifications to bachelor’s level accepted the invitation to participate in the study. Students were all studying in either year 2 or 3 of their degree with 38.6% having previously completed another degree. Gender across the entire cohort was evenly distributed (50.3% female, 47.6% male, and 2.1% other/preferred not to say). The mean age of participants was 31.9 years (SD=9.3). The country of birth was Australia for 84.9% of respondents, and 90.4% indicated that English was their first language.

Perceptions of Disaster Vulnerability

The total mean score on the PADVS for the response cohort was 45.39 (SD=9.06) out of 65, indicating a moderate level of concern about disaster vulnerability related to population aging. Among the 3 cohorts, nursing students scored higher than paramedic students, but the difference was not statistically significant. Additionally, there was no correlation between age or gender and total PADVS score. This suggests a degree of homogeneity in health students’ assessments of older adults’ disaster vulnerability in Australia. Across the 4 subscales, declining function and isolation and access were the areas of greatest concern for respondents. Subscale results are summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1

Absolute and Comparative Scores on 4 PADVS Subscales Addressing Issues Associated with Age-Related and Societal Vulnerability to Disasters (N=146)

* Higher subscale scores indicate greater respondent concern for issues relating to older adult disaster vulnerability in Australian society.

Respondents who indicated that they had completed a prior university degree showed significantly higher PADVS scores than those with no prior degree (r=0.22, P<0.001). According to Cohen’s criteria,Reference Cohen 51 this relationship was of medium strength. An independent samples T-test was conducted to compare the PADVS scores for respondents who had previously completed a tertiary degree and those who had not. There was a significant difference in scores for those who reported having a prior degree, M=47.93 (SD=7.73), and those without, M=43.80 (SD=9.55; t [144]=2.71, P=0.008 [two-tailed]). The magnitude of the differences in means was in the range of small to moderate (eta squared=0.03). It appears, therefore, those students who have a prior university qualification perceive older adults to be more vulnerable to disasters than respondents without a prior qualification.

DISCUSSION

This research reports on a cohort of Australian health care students’ perceptions of societal vulnerabilities to disaster in relation to older members of the community. The increased likelihood of natural disasters, particularly relating to the effects of climate change as we enter the so-called Anthropocene epoch,Reference Whitmee, Haines and Beyrer 52 means communities must prepare their health care workforces to meet the challenges that such disasters pose. The need to continually assess societal vulnerability is considered an important factor in formulating appropriate disaster responses and protecting communities from harm.Reference Annear, Otani, Gao and Keeling 49

This study has identified that, among a cohort of Australian health care students, there is a moderate, though not high, level of concern about societal vulnerability to disasters in relation to an aging population. This perception is lower than that expressed by a previously reported Japanese cohort where respondents considered population aging to be associated with a higher increase in societal vulnerability when disasters occur.Reference Annear, Otani, Gao and Keeling 49 This finding may relate to a greater awareness of disasters and their effects in Japan where earthquakes, tsunami, and typhoons occur regularly. It also suggests that there may be a level of complacency among Australian health trainees concerning their assessments of the potential for disasters in Australia and the resultant impacts on older adults. This suggests a need for increased focus on this topic in Australian health care education programs as community resilience to disasters relies on active participation and awarenessReference Bergstrand, Mayer, Brumback and Zhang 53 - 55 and our research illuminates a relative lack of awareness about vulnerability to disasters in the context of an aging population.

Many of our research participants had previous qualifications, predominantly in the health sciences, and having such qualifications was positively correlated with a higher PADVS score. That is, prior education is related to a perception of higher levels of disaster vulnerability among older adults. This is potentially due to an increased understanding of the health and social needs of older adults. It was not possible to determine whether this additional learning was accompanied by a period consolidating practice before re-entering the tertiary learning environment. As such, we cannot affirm whether it is extended and scaffolded learning that makes a difference or time spent “on the job” and contextualizing theory with regards to a perceived vulnerability associated with aging. However, our findings suggest that, for those with more training, particularly in health care, there is a better understanding of the frailty or complexity of aging bodies with reference to disaster vulnerability. This group may have also had more workplace exposure to older adults after completing their first qualification in health, although this remains to be explored in planned future research with a nationally representative sample.

As first responders, paramedics are well placed to address health problems faced by older adults during and after a natural disaster. In the often chaotic circumstances that follow a major disaster, health and social care workforces must have a capacity to operate effectively during times of social and environmental disruption,Reference Bergstrand, Mayer, Brumback and Zhang 53 such as during the aftermath of a disaster, and prepare for challenges such as managing people with dementia.Reference Furukawa, Ootsuki, Kodama and Arai 56 , Reference Furukawa, Ishiki and Tomita 57 Age-related conditions are likely to be exacerbated in a natural disaster, and the acceleration of climate change and rapid urbanization is likely to increase the vulnerability of older adults to hazardous conditions that jeopardize their health.Reference Furukawa, Ootsuki and Nitta 28 , Reference Dirkzwager, Grievink, Van der Velden and Yzermans 41 , Reference Cutter, Emrich, Webb and Morath 54 , In Australia, where a significant number of older people live in rural and regional areas and the risk of bushfires is exacerbated as a result of extreme weather events, the vulnerability of older adults is also likely to increase. Similarly, as the population of urban dwelling older adults grows as part of a broader trend of increasing urbanization across the Asia-Pacific region, 58 the risks for heat-related mortality also rise.Reference Uejio, Wilhelmi and Golden 59 Future interventions to prepare paramedics for increasing age-related vulnerability should focus on pathology and care practices for age-related physical, cognitive, and sensory issues, including frailty, dementia, and pain,Reference Lucas, Mason and Annear 60 which will be faced by practitioners with increasing frequency.Reference Cutter, Emrich, Webb and Morath 54 , Reference Costello, Abbas and Allen 61

Limitations

The findings of this research need to be considered in the context of the following limitations. First, the research involved students from two campuses of a large public university in two Australian States, as well as a cohort of students engaged in online distance education. Consequently, results may not be more broadly generalizable at this stage. The distribution in the data and a diversity of perspectives among the sample, however, suggest that the findings may be replicated with larger random samples. The results also compare favorably with pilot results obtained from health care students and educators in Japan, suggesting the reliability of our findings.Reference Annear, Otani, Gao and Keeling 49 Second, there are inherent limitations in baseline awareness among a cohort of volunteer participants. Compared to Japan, Australia has a relatively low exposure to disasters resulting in significant mortality among older adults. In 2016, the United Nations World Risk Index ranked Japan at 17 of 171 countries in terms of risk of vulnerability to disasters, whereas Australia was ranked 121.Reference Garschagen, Hagenlocher and Comes 62 This variation in vulnerability might affect baseline awareness and participation rates because Australian students may not yet appreciate the relevance of research of this nature (even as national and regional health agencies try to raise awareness and formulate disaster management strategies).

Developing Community Resilience

Both the COAG National Strategy for Disaster Resilience 44 and the Tasmanian State Natural Disaster Risk AssessmentReference White, Remenyi and McEvoy 45 identify the importance of developing community resilience to better withstand the effects of disasters. Consequently, future health care workers, including paramedics, must be conversant with societal factors that increase mortality and morbidity risk during disasters. The aforementioned documents identify the need for community-level risk assessments to inform emergency services response to natural disasters. These documents also highlight vulnerable populations, including older adults, and identify how emergency management services must adapt their responses to mitigate harm in these vulnerable groups. Additionally, the COAG National Strategy for Disaster Resilience identifies the inclusion of disaster risk reduction knowledge in relevant higher education institutions as a priority. 44 We believe that our study directly aligns with state and national strategies by identifying perceptions of disaster vulnerability that may have negative impacts on disaster resilience. In addition, this research highlights knowledge deficits that should be prioritized in designing future disaster response systems until that knowledge gap can be addressed.

CONCLUSION

This study examined health care students’ perception of societal vulnerability to disasters, with a focus on older members of the community, to inform emergency services disaster response planning processes and educational intervention. Our results indicate that Australian health care students perceive older adults as moderately vulnerable to disasters with no significant differences between nursing and paramedic student cohorts. Our research also found that students with previous degree level qualifications viewed older adults as more vulnerable to disasters than students without this prior education. Finally, our research found that Australian health care students consider their communities less vulnerable to disasters when compared to a Japanese cohort surveyed about their own aging population.Reference Annear, Otani, Gao and Keeling 49 We consider our findings indicate current education of future health care professionals does not promote an adequate level of awareness of the health-related challenges posed by disasters, which are forecast to become more frequent and more intense as we move into the Anthropocene epoch. Low levels of awareness and preparedness were evident during the Australian southeastern heat wave of 2009 in which the capacity of the community to cope with the conditions was considered to have been exceeded.Reference Nitschke, Tucker and Hansen 30 Without addressing this gap in education, the risk of significant negative outcomes to both the underprepared responderReference Anderson, Prioleau and Taku 63 and older members of the communityReference Watts, Adger and Agnolucci 39 is likely. The New Zealand earthquakes of 2010-2011 and subsequent community response showed that health care students can be a ready and willing source of volunteers to assist their communities in the aftermath of a disasterReference Hayward 64 ; however, if students are unprepared, exposure to traumatic events may have long-term negative consequences.Reference Anderson, Prioleau and Taku 63 Based on the findings of this research and the recommendations of the National Strategy for Disaster Resilience, we call for disaster vulnerability to be made a core component of geriatric education for undergraduate paramedics. We propose that outcomes of any such educational interventions be rigorously evaluated to inform future initiatives aimed at raising awareness of societal vulnerability to disaster in the context of an aging population.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors report no conflict of interests.

References

REFERENCES

1. World Health Organization. Global health and ageing. Geneva: WHO. 2011.Google Scholar
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Population ageing. 2017. http://www.aihw.gov.au/ageing/older-australia-at-a-glance/demographics/age-and-gender/. Accessed July 1, 2017.Google Scholar
3. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2015; World population ageing. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf. Accessed June 7, 2017.Google Scholar
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2013; Population projections, Australia 2012 to 2101, Cat. No. 3222.0. http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/13D196FB0DBECC3BCA257C2E00173FAD/$File/32220_2012 (base) to 2101.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2017.Google Scholar
5. Strandberg, TE, Pitkälä, KH, Tilvis, RS, et al. Geriatric syndromes – vascular disorders? Ann Med. 2013;45(3):265-273.Google Scholar
6. Arendts, G, Lowthian, J. Demography is destiny: an agenda for geriatric emergency medicine in Australasia. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25:271-278.Google Scholar
7. Ferri, CP, Prince, M, Brayne, C, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet. 2006;366(9503):2112-2117.Google Scholar
8. Lowthian, J, Jolley, D, Curtis, A, et al. The challenges of population ageing: accelerating demand for emergency ambulance services by older patients, 1995-2015. Med J Aust. 2011;194(11):574.Google Scholar
9. Chilton, M. A brief analysis of trends in prehospital care services and a vision for the future. Australas J Paramed. 2004;2(1):Article 5.Google Scholar
10. Lowthian, J, Curtis, A, Stoelwinder, J, et al. Emergency demand and repeat attendances by older patients. Int Med J. 2013;43(5):554-560.Google Scholar
11. Lundgren, AS, Ljuslinder, K. The baby-boom is over and the ageing shock awaits: populist media imagery in news-press representations of population ageing. IJAL. 2012;6(2):39-71.Google Scholar
12. Martin, R, Williams, C, O’Neill, D. Retrospective analysis of attitudes to ageing in the Economist: apocalyptic demography for opinion formers. BMJ. 2009;339:b4914.Google Scholar
13. World Health Organization. Older persons in emergencies: an active ageing perspective. Geneva: WHO. 2008.Google Scholar
14. Annear, M, Keeling, S, Wilkinson, T. Participatory and evidence‐based recommendations for urban redevelopment following natural disasters: older adults as policy advisers. Australas J Ageing. 2014;33(1):43-49.Google Scholar
15. Howard, A, Blakemore, T, Bevis, M. Older people as assets in disaster preparedness, response and recovery: lessons from regional Australia. Ageing Soc. 2015:1-20.Google Scholar
16. Muramatsu, N, Akiyama, H. Japan: super-aging society preparing for the future. Gerontologist. 2011;51(4):425-432.Google Scholar
17. Brockie, L, Miller, E. Understanding older adults’ resilience during the Brisbane floods: social capital, life experience, and optimism. Dis Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(1):72-79.Google Scholar
18. Tuohy, R, Stephens, C, Johnston, D. Older adults’ disaster preparedness in the context of the September 2010–December 2012 Canterbury earthquake sequence. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2014;9:194-203.Google Scholar
19. Flanagan, BE, Gregory, EW, Hallisey, EJ, et al. A social vulnerability index for disaster management. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2011;8(1):Article 3.Google Scholar
20. Giddens, A. The Politics of Climate Change: National Responses to the Challenge of Global Warming. London: Policy Network. 2008.Google Scholar
21. Kovats, RS, Hajat, S. Heat stress and public health: a critical review. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:41-55.Google Scholar
22. Meehl, GA, Tebaldi, C. More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science. 2004;305(5686):994-997.Google Scholar
23. Aldrich, N, Benson, WF. Disaster preparedness and the chronic disease needs of vulnerable older adults. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5(1):1-7.Google Scholar
24. Parkinson, D, Zara, C. The hidden disaster: domestic violence in the aftermath of natural disaster. Aust J Emerg Manage. 2013;28(2):28.Google Scholar
25. Hughes, L, Hanna, E, Fenwick, J. The silent killer: climate change and the health impacts of extreme heat. Canberra: The Climate Council of Australia. 2016.Google Scholar
26. Hajat, S, Kosatky, T. Heat-related mortality: a review and exploration of heterogeneity. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(9):753-760.Google Scholar
27. Annear, M, Wilkinson, T, Keeling, S. Psychological challenges among older adults following the Christchurch earthquakes. J Disaster Res. 2013;8(3):508-511.Google Scholar
28. Furukawa, K, Ootsuki, M, Nitta, A, et al. Aggravation of Alzheimer’s disease symptoms after the earthquake in Japan: a comparative analysis of subcategories. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13(4):1081-1082.Google Scholar
29. The White House. The federal response to Hurricane Katrina: lessons learned. Washington (DC). 2006. http://library.stmarytx.edu/acadlib/edocs/katrinawh.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2017.Google Scholar
30. Nitschke, M, Tucker, GR, Hansen, AL, et al. Impact of two recent extreme heat episodes on morbidity and mortality in Adelaide, South Australia: a case-series analysis. Environ Health. 2011;10(1):42.Google Scholar
31. Bissell, RA, Becker, BM, Burkle, FM Jr. Health care personnel in disaster response. Emerg Med Clin. 1996;14(2):267-288.Google Scholar
32. Chaffee, M. Willingness of health care personnel to work in a disaster: an integrative review of the literature. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013;3(1):42-56.Google Scholar
33. Kahn, CA, Schultz, CH, Miller, KT, Anderson, CL. Does START triage work? An outcomes assessment after a disaster. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(3):424-430. e1.Google Scholar
34. Lerner, EB, Schwartz, RB, Coule, PL, et al. Mass casualty triage: an evaluation of the data and development of a proposed national guideline. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013;2(S1):S25-S34.Google Scholar
35. Kilner, T. Triage decisions of prehospital emergency health care providers, using a multiple casualty scenario paper exercise. Emerg Med J. 2002;19(4):348-353.Google Scholar
36. Gamble, JL, Hurley, BJ, Schultz, PA, et al. Climate change and older Americans: state of the science. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(1):15.Google Scholar
37. Fernandez, LS, Byard, D, Lin, C-C, et al. Frail elderly as disaster victims: emergency management strategies. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;17(2):67-74.Google Scholar
38. Vandentorren, S, Bretin, P, Zeghnoun, A, et al. August 2003 heat wave in France: risk factors for death of elderly people living at home. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16(6):583-591.Google Scholar
39. Watts, N, Adger, WN, Agnolucci, P, et al. Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health. Lancet. 2015;386(10006):1861-1914.Google Scholar
40. Bright, F, Gilbert, JD, Winskog, C, Byard, R. Inadequate domestic insulation in Australia – an additional risk factor for lethal hypothermia. Pathology. 2013;45:S90.Google Scholar
41. Dirkzwager, AJ, Grievink, L, Van der Velden, PG, Yzermans, CJ. Risk factors for psychological and physical health problems after a man-made disaster. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189(2):144-149.Google Scholar
42. Cutter, SL, Boruff, BJ, Shirley, WL. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q. 2003;84(2):242-261.Google Scholar
43. Coates, L, Haynes, K, O’Brien, J, et al. Exploring 167 years of vulnerability: an examination of extreme heat events in Australia, 1844–2010. Environ Sci Policy. 2014;42:33-44.Google Scholar
44. Council of Australian Governments. National strategy for disaster resilience. Canberra: COAG. 2011.Google Scholar
45. White, CJ, Remenyi, T, McEvoy, D, et al. Tasmanian State Natural Disaster Risk Assessment. Hobart, Australia: University of Tasmania. 2016.Google Scholar
46. Council of Ambulance Authorities. Paramedic Professional Competency Standards Version 2.2. St Kilda: CAA. 2013.Google Scholar
47. Cone, DC, Serra, J, Kurland, L. Comparison of the SALT and Smart triage systems using a virtual reality simulator with paramedic students. Eur J Emerg Med. 2011;18(6):314-321.Google Scholar
48. Wilkerson, W, Avstreih, D, Gruppen, L, et al. Using immersive simulation for training first responders for mass casualty incidents. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1152-1159.Google Scholar
49. Annear, MJ, Otani, J, Gao, X, Keeling, S. Japanese perceptions of societal vulnerability to disasters during population ageing: constitution of a new scale and initial findings. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2016;18:32-40.Google Scholar
50. Maneesriwongul, W, Dixon, JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(2):175-186.Google Scholar
51. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. 1988.Google Scholar
52. Whitmee, S, Haines, A, Beyrer, C, et al. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation – Lancet commission on planetary health. Lancet. 2015;386(10007):1973-2028.Google Scholar
53. Bergstrand, K, Mayer, B, Brumback, B, Zhang, Y. Assessing the relationship between social vulnerability and community resilience to hazards. Soc Indic Res. 2015;122(2):391.Google Scholar
54. Cutter, SL, Emrich, CT, Webb, JJ, Morath, D. Social vulnerability to climate variability hazards: a review of the literature. Final Rep Oxfam Am. 2009;5:1-44.Google Scholar
55. Emergency Management Victoria. Community Resilience Framework For Emergency Management. Melbourne: EMV. 2017.Google Scholar
56. Furukawa, K, Ootsuki, M, Kodama, M, Arai, H. Exacerbation of dementia after the earthquake and tsunami in Japan. J Neurol. 2012;259(6):1243.Google Scholar
57. Furukawa, K, Ishiki, A, Tomita, N, et al. What we did and learnt in the care of the patients with dementia after the Great East Japan earthquake in 2011. Nihon Rinsho Jap J Clin Med. 2016;74(3):519-522.Google Scholar
58. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision. New York: United Nations. 2012.Google Scholar
59. Uejio, CK, Wilhelmi, OV, Golden, JS, et al. Intra-urban societal vulnerability to extreme heat: the role of heat exposure and the built environment, socioeconomics, and neighborhood stability. Health Place. 2011;17(2):498-507.Google Scholar
60. Lucas, PV, Mason, R, Annear, M, et al. Pain assessment in older adults with dementia: an exploratory pilot study of paramedic students’ perceptions of the utility of two validated assessment tools. Australas J Paramed. 2016;13(3):Article 3.Google Scholar
61. Costello, A, Abbas, M, Allen, A, et al. Managing the health effects of climate change. Lancet. 2009;373(9676):1693-1733.Google Scholar
62. Garschagen, M, Hagenlocher, M, Comes, M, et al. World Risk Report 2016. Berlin: Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft and UNU-EHS. 2016.Google Scholar
63. Anderson, D, Prioleau, P, Taku, K, et al. Post-traumatic stress and growth among medical student volunteers after the March 2011 disaster in Fukushima, Japan: implications for student involvement with future disasters. Psychiatr Q. 2016;87(2):241.Google Scholar
64. Hayward, BM. Rethinking resilience: reflections on the earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, 2010 and 2011. Ecol Soc. 2013;18(4):37-42.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Absolute and Comparative Scores on 4 PADVS Subscales Addressing Issues Associated with Age-Related and Societal Vulnerability to Disasters (N=146)