Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:57:16.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Past and future: vaccination against Eimeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2009

V. McDONALD*
Affiliation:
Centre for Gastroenterology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newark St, London E1 2AD, UK
M. W. SHIRLEY
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Health, Compton, Nr Newbury, Berkshire RG20 7NN, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Centre for Gastroenterology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newark St, London E1 2AD, UK. Tel: +0207 882 7202. Fax: +0207 882 2187. E-mail: v.mcdonald@qmul.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eimeria spp. are the causative agents of coccidiosis, a major disease affecting many intensively-reared livestock, especially poultry. The chicken is host to 7 species of Eimeria that develop within intestinal epithelial cells and produce varying degrees of morbidity and mortality. Control of coccidiosis by the poultry industry is dominated by prophylactic chemotherapy but drug resistance is a serious problem. Strongly protective but species-specific immunity can be induced in chickens by infection with any of the Eimeria spp. At the Institute of Animal Health in Houghton, UK in the 1980s we showed that all 7 Eimeria spp. could be stably attenuated by serial passage in chickens of the earliest oocysts produced (i.e. the first parasites to complete their endogenous development) and this process resulted in the depletion of asexual development. Despite being highly attenuated, the precocious lines retained their immunizing capacity. Subsequent work led to the commercial introduction of the first live attenuated vaccine, Paracox®, that has now been in use for 20 years. As much work still remains to be done before the development of recombinant vaccines becomes a reality, it is likely that reliance upon live, attenuated vaccines will increase in years to come.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Table 1. Effect of selection for precocious development on the prepatent time and oocyst reproduction

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Differential counts, expressed as a percentage of the total number of parasites observed, of sporozoites and second generation asexual stages of Eimeria mitis H and HP in sections of gut taken from infected chickens at 6 h intervals between 30 h and 42 h post-infection. The latent period before transformation of sporozoites into trophozoites is shortened in the precocious line and parasites of the 2nd asexual generation appear earlier (based on data from McDonald and Shirley, 1984).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Diagrammatic representation of the endogenous development of Eimeria mitis H and HP showing events that lead to decreases in reproductive capacity and pre-papatent time in the precocious line. Each generation of schizogony is represented by the numbers 1–4. Compared with the wild-type strain, the precocious first generation schizont took less time to mature (see Fig. 1) and the mature form was smaller and produced fewer merozoites. Gametes of the parent strain appeared to develop only from merozoites of fourth generation schizonts while precocious line gametes could develop from merozoites of the second or third generation schizonts (the majority). Few fourth generation schizonts were observed. (Based on data from McDonald and Shirley, 1984; McDonald and Shirley, 1985.)