Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zkb6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T13:18:17.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linear impulse response in three-dimensional oscillatory boundary layers formed by periodic modulation of a rotating disk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2022

Scott Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Computing, Bridgend College, Pencoed, Bridgend CF35 5LG, UK
Christopher Davies
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
Christian Thomas*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: christian.thomas@mq.edu.au

Abstract

A numerical investigation is undertaken on the development of linear disturbances in the rotating disk boundary layer, in which a time-periodic modulation is applied to the disk rotation rate. The model gives a prototypical example of a three-dimensional oscillatory boundary layer, by adding a Stokes layer to the von Kármán flow that develops on a steady disk. The study extends the Floquet analysis of Morgan et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 925, 2021, A20), who showed that disk modulation stabilises the stationary convective instabilities found on the steady rotating disk. Using a radial homogeneous flow approximation, whereby the radial dependence of the basic state is ignored, disturbance development is simulated for several modulation settings, with flow conditions matched to both convective and absolute forms of linear instability. Disturbances excited via a stationary periodic wall forcing display behaviour consistent with that found using Floquet theory; time-periodic modulation stabilises the cross-flow instability by reducing the radial growth rate. In addition, convective and absolute instabilities, generated by an impulsive wall forcing, are both stabilised by the introduction of modulation to the disk rotation rate. Modulation establishes a significant reduction in both the temporal growth rate and the disturbance amplitude as it propagates away from the impulse origin. Moreover, greater stabilising control benefits are realised as the modulation amplitude increases.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1.Schematic sketches of the evolution of a spatiotemporal wavepacket generated by an impulse, within the radial $r$ and time $t$ plane: (a) convective instability; (b) absolute instability.

Figure 1

Figure 2.Velocity profiles (a) $F$, (b) $G$ and (c) $H$, as functions of the wall-normal $z$-direction, for Reynolds number ${{Re}} = 500$, modulation amplitude $\epsilon = 0.2$ and frequency $\varphi = 8$. Results are plotted at $t/T_m=0$ (blue solid lines), $t/T_m=0.25$ (red dashed), $t/T_m=0.5$ (yellow dot-dashed) and $t/T_m=0.75$ (purple dotted). The steady solution is given by the black dotted lines, while $T_m$ denotes one full cycle of disk modulation.

Figure 2

Figure 3.Contours of the azimuthal vorticity perturbation field $\xi _{\theta }$ for Reynolds number ${{Re}}=500$, azimuthal mode number $n=32$, and local temporal frequency $\omega =0$. Solutions are excited by a localised steady forcing centred at $r_f={{Re}}$ and normalised on their respective maximum absolute values, $\max _z|\xi _{\theta }|$. Modulation frequency is $\varphi =8$, with amplitudes (a) $\epsilon =0$, (b) $\epsilon =0.1$, and (c) $\epsilon =0.2$.

Figure 3

Figure 4.Absolute value of perturbation fields (a) $|\xi _{\theta }|$, (b) $|u_{r}|$ and (c) $|u_{\theta }|$, about a fixed radial location, for the flow conditions modelled in figure 3. Each solution is normalised on the respective absolute value of the azimuthal vorticity perturbation field at the disk wall, $|\xi _{\theta,w}|$. Modulation frequency is $\varphi =8$, with amplitudes $\epsilon =0$ (solid line), $\epsilon =0.1$ (dashed) and $\epsilon =0.2$ (dot-dashed).

Figure 4

Figure 5.Absolute value of the azimuthal vorticity perturbation field at the disk wall, $|\xi _{\theta,w}|$, for the flow conditions modelled in figure 3. Modulation frequency is $\varphi =8$, with amplitudes $\epsilon \in [0,0.4]$. Solutions normalised to unity at $r=600\equiv r_f+100$.

Figure 5

Table 1.Radial wavenumbers $\alpha$ for stationary disturbances computed via Floquet theory (Morgan et al.2021) and DNS for a steady wall forcing (4.1b).

Figure 6

Figure 6.Same as figure 5, but for (a) ${{Re}}=400$ and $n=25$, (b) ${{Re}}=600$ and $n=40$. Each disturbance was excited at $r_f={{Re}}$, and solutions normalised to unity at $r=r_f+100$.

Figure 7

Figure 7.Temporal evolution of the envelopes of the azimuthal vorticity perturbation field at the disk wall, $\pm |\xi _{\theta,w}|$, for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=32$ and $r_f={{Re}}=500$. The modulation amplitude is $\epsilon =0.1$, with frequencies $\varphi =4$ (dashed lines), $\varphi =8$ (dot-dashed) and $\varphi =12$ (dotted). Steady flow results are represented by the solid lines. Here, (a) $r=r_f$, (b) $r =r_f+25$, (c) $r =r_f+50$, (d) $r =r_f+75$, and $T =2{\rm \pi} {{Re}}$ is the non-dimensional time period for the disk rotation.

Figure 8

Figure 8.Same as figure 7, but for $\epsilon =0.2$.

Figure 9

Figure 9.Spatiotemporal development of $|\xi _{\theta,w}|$ for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=32$ and $r_f={{Re}}=500$. Contours are drawn using a natural logarithmic scaling and normalised at $t/T=0.1$. The modulation frequency is $\varphi =8$, with amplitudes (a) $\epsilon =0$, (b) $\epsilon =0.1$, and (c) $\epsilon =0.2$. (Contour levels are plotted on the logarithmic interval $[-1,7]$.)

Figure 10

Figure 10.Development of the maximum value of $|\xi _{\theta,w}|$ for disturbance wavepackets generated by impulsive excitation centred at $r_f={{Re}}=500$ for $n=32$ and variable modulation amplitudes $\epsilon$. (a,c,e) Magnitudes of the maxima, (b,d,f) radial trajectories $r_{max}$ of the amplitude maxima, for modulation frequencies (a,b) $\varphi =4$, (c,d) $\varphi =8$, and (e,f) $\varphi =12$. All disturbances are normalised so that they are equal to unity for $t/T =0.1$.

Figure 11

Figure 11.Temporal evolution of the envelopes of the azimuthal vorticity perturbation field at the disk wall, $\pm |\xi _{\theta,w}|$, for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=68$ and $r_f={{Re}}=525$. The modulation frequency is $\varphi =8$, with amplitudes $\epsilon =0$ (solid lines), $\epsilon =0.1$ (dashed) and $\epsilon =0.2$ (dot-dashed), and (a) $r=r_f-25$, (b) $r =r_f$, (c) $r=r_f+25$, and (d) $r =r_f+50$.

Figure 12

Figure 12.Spatiotemporal development of $|\xi _{\theta,w}|$ for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=68$ and $r_f={{Re}}=525$. The modulation frequency is $\varphi =8$, with amplitudes (a) $\epsilon =0$, (b) $\epsilon =0.1$, and (c) $\epsilon =0.2$. (Contour levels are plotted on the logarithmic interval $[-1,12]$.)

Figure 13

Figure 13.Temporal frequencies $f_r$ and temporal growth rates $f_i$ for the disturbances modelled in figures 11 and 12, where $n=68$ and $r_f={{Re}}=525$. The temporal development is plotted for four different radial positions: $r =r_f-25$ (solid lines), $r =r_f$ (dashed), $r = r_f + 25$ (dot-dashed) and $r = r_f + 50$ (dotted), and: (a,b) $\varphi =8$ and $\epsilon =0$, (c,d) $\varphi =8$ and $\epsilon =0.1$, and (e,f) $\varphi =8$ and $\epsilon =0.2$.

Figure 14

Table 2.Mean temporal frequencies $\bar {f}_r$ and growth rates $\bar {f}_i$ for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=68$ and variable Reynolds number ${{Re}}$ and modulation settings $\varphi$ and $\epsilon$. Mean results are calculated by averaging $f_r$ and $f_i$ over one full period of disk modulation about the radius $r=r_f={{Re}}$.

Figure 15

Figure 14.Same as figure 12 for (a) $\varphi =4$ and $\epsilon =0.1$, (b) $\varphi =12$ and $\epsilon =0.1$, (c) $\varphi =4$ and $\epsilon =0.2$, (d) $\varphi =12$ and $\epsilon =0.2$.

Figure 16

Figure 15.Temporal frequencies $f_r$ and temporal growth rates $f_i$ for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=68$ and $r_f={{Re}}=550$. The temporal development is plotted about the radial position $r =r_f$, with the modulation amplitudes $\epsilon =0$ (solid lines), $\epsilon =0.1$ (dashed) and $\epsilon =0.2$ (dot-dashed), for (a,b) $\varphi =4$, (c,d) $\varphi =8$, and (e,f) $\varphi =12$.

Figure 17

Figure 16.Spatiotemporal development of $|\xi _{\theta,w}|$ for impulsively excited disturbances with $r_f={{Re}}$, $n=68$ and $\varphi =12$, for (a) ${{Re}}=550$ and $\epsilon =0$, (b) ${{Re}}=600$ and $\epsilon =0$, (c) ${{Re}}=550$ and $\epsilon =0.1$, (d) ${{Re}}=600$ and $\epsilon =0.1$, (e) ${{Re}}=550$ and $\epsilon =0.2$, (f) ${{Re}}=600$ and $\epsilon =0.2$, (g) ${{Re}}=550$ and $\epsilon =0.3$, (h) ${{Re}}=600$ and $\epsilon =0.3$. (Contour levels are plotted on the logarithmic interval $[-1,14]$.)

Figure 18

Figure 17.Development of the maximum value of $|\xi _{\theta,w}|$ for disturbance wavepackets generated by impulsive excitation centred at $r_f={{Re}}$ for $n=68$ and variable modulation amplitudes $\epsilon$. (a,c) Magnitudes of the maxima; (b,d) radial trajectories of the amplitude maxima. The Reynolds number is ${{Re}}=550$ in (a,b), and ${{Re}}=600$ in (c,d). The modulation frequency is $\varphi =12$, and all disturbances are normalised so that they are equal to unity at $t/T=0.1$.

Figure 19

Figure 18.Mean temporal growth rates $\bar {f}_i$ as functions of Reynolds number ${{Re}}$, with (a) $(n,\varphi )=(68,4)$, (b) $(n,\varphi )=(100,4)$, (c) $(n,\varphi )=(68,8)$, (d) $(n,\varphi )=(100,8)$, (e) $(n,\varphi )=(68,12)$, and (f) $(n,\varphi )=(100,12)$. The modulation amplitudes are $\epsilon =0$ (solid line), $\epsilon =0.1$ (dashed), $\epsilon =0.2$ (dot-dashed) and $\epsilon =0.3$ (dotted). Mean results are calculated by averaging $f_i$ over one full period of disk modulation at the radius $r=r_f={{Re}}$.

Figure 20

Table 3.Same as table 2 for $n=100$.

Figure 21

Figure 19.Mean temporal growth rates $\bar {f}_i$ as functions of the modulation amplitude $\epsilon$ with frequency $\varphi =8$, and Reynolds numbers ${{Re}}=550$ (solid line), ${{Re}}=600$ (dashed), ${{Re}}=650$ (dot-dashed) and ${{Re}}=700$ (dotted), with azimuthal mode numbers (a) $n=68$, (b) $n=100$.

Figure 22

Table 4.Predictions for the critical Reynolds number ${{Re}}_c$ for azimuthal mode numbers $n=68$ and $n=100$. Calculations are based on applying linear interpolation to the solutions presented in figure 18.

Figure 23

Figure 20.Mean temporal growth rates $\bar {f}_i$ as functions of the modulation frequency $\varphi$ with Reynolds number ${{Re}}=600$, and modulation amplitudes $\epsilon =0$ (solid line), $\epsilon =0.1$ (dashed), $\epsilon =0.2$ (dot-dashed) and $\epsilon =0.3$ (dotted), and azimuthal mode numbers (a) $n=68$, (b) $n=100$.

Figure 24

Figure 21.Temporal evolution of the azimuthal vorticity perturbation field at the disk wall, $\xi _{\theta,w}$, for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=68$ and $r_f={{Re}}=600$. The modulation amplitude is $\epsilon =0.1$, and frequency is $\varphi =8$. Solutions are plotted for radial and temporal step sizes $(\Delta r, \Delta t)=(1,0.5)$ (solid lines), $(\Delta r, \Delta t)=(1,0.25)$ (dashed) and $(\Delta r, \Delta t)=(0.5,0.5)$ (dotted), for (a) $r=r_f$, and (b) $r =r_f+50$. Here, $T =2{\rm \pi} {{Re}}$ is the non-dimensional time period for the disk rotation.

Figure 25

Table 5.Mean temporal frequencies $\bar {f}_r$ and growth rates $\bar {f}_i$ for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=68$, ${{Re}}=600$, $\epsilon =0.1$ and $\varphi =8$. Mean results are calculated by averaging $f_r$ and $f_i$ over one full period of disk modulation about the radius $r=r_f={{Re}}$.

Figure 26

Figure 22.Instantaneous radial variation of the azimuthal vorticity perturbation field at the disk wall, $\xi _{\theta,w}$, for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=68$ and $r_f={{Re}}=600$. The modulation amplitude is $\epsilon =0.1$, and frequency is $\varphi =8$. The outer radial boundary is fixed at $r_{out}=1300$ (solid lines) and $r_{out}=1500$ (dashed), for (a) $t/T=1.15$, and (b) $t/T=2.3$.

Figure 27

Figure 23.Temporal evolution of the azimuthal vorticity perturbation field at the disk wall, $\xi _{\theta,w}$, for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=68$ and $r_f={{Re}}=600$. The modulation amplitude is $\epsilon =0.1$, and frequency is $\varphi =8$. Solutions are plotted for an initial impulse $\sigma =1/(20{\rm \pi} )^{2}$ (solid lines), $\sigma =1/(40{\rm \pi} )^{2}$ (dashed) and $\sigma =1/(2{\rm \pi} )^{2}$ (dotted). Solutions are normalised to unity at $t/T=0.1$.

Figure 28

Figure 24.Variation in the initial phase $\gamma$ of the unsteady base flow, for impulsively excited disturbances with $n=68$, $r_f={{Re}}=525$, $\epsilon =0.1$ and $\varphi =8$. (a) Temporal evolution of the envelopes $|\xi _{\theta,w}|$ at $r=r_f$. (b) Temporal evolution of the radial location $r_{{te}}$ of the trailing edge, associated with the spatiotemporal disturbance development, with solutions normalised to unity at $t/T=0.1$.