Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:39:33.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Amazonian forest fragmentation on the interaction between plants, insect herbivores, and their natural enemies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2008

Sarita B. Fáveri*
Affiliation:
Coordenação de Zoologia, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Avenida Perimetral 1901, Bairro Terra Firme, 66077-530 Belém, PA, Brazil
Heraldo L. Vasconcelos
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, CP 593, 38400-902 Uberlândia, MG, Brazil
Rodolfo Dirzo
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
*
1Corresponding author. Email: sfaveri@museu-goeldi.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We evaluated the effects of forest fragmentation on herbivory on central Amazonian trees. Levels of herbivory were measured on leaves from a total of 1200 saplings from 337 species. There was a positive and significant effect of forest fragment area on herbivore damage, with plants from continuous forest having twice as much damage as plants in the smallest fragments studied (1 ha). Measurements of herbivory rates on two species, however, indicate that the effect can be species-specific. Forest area had a positive and linear effect on rates of herbivory in Henriettella caudata (Melastomataceae), whereas in Protium hebetatum (Burseraceae), rates of herbivory were greater in the 10-ha fragments than in the 1-ha fragments and in continuous forest. There is no evidence that the nutritional and defensive characteristics of the leaves of the species we studied changed as a result of forest fragmentation, at least not in a manner consistent with the observed herbivory patterns. Herbivore predation levels, measured with artificial caterpillars, also showed no significant relationship with forest area. Therefore, neither of these top-down and bottom-up forces could explain the observed patterns of herbivory. It is suggested, instead, that forest fragmentation may affect the dispersal of insect herbivores, and reduce their abundances on small forest isolates. Altered patterns of herbivory on tree saplings may have important consequences for forest structure and dynamics.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
Figure 0

Figure 1. Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination of the nine forest fragments and the three continuous-forest study-plots according to composition of the tree sapling community. N = 100 tree saplings (2–7 m in height and > 1 cm in dbh) in each plot. Ordination was based on species abundance data for a total 337 central Amazonian tree species.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Effect of forest area on standing levels of herbivory (per cent of leaf area damaged) on leaves of central Amazonian tree saplings. In each forest site, herbivory was measured in 100 randomly selected saplings. Points represent the mean level of herbivory per site, and the line is the estimated regression line, where Herbivory = 4.51 + 1.19Log(Area) (r2 = 0.404, P = 0.026).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Effects of forest area on leaf herbivory rates (% damaged d−1) in saplings of Protium hebetatum (a) and Henriettella caudata (b). Points represent the mean rate of herbivory per plant species per site, and the line is the estimated regression line for H. caudata, where Herbivory = 0.076 + 0.046Log(Area) (r2 = 0.573, P = 0.011).

Figure 3

Table 1. Pearson correlation coefficients for the relationship between forest area and some nutritional and defensive characteristics of the leaves of Protium hebetatum and Henriettella caudata. For both plant species n = 10 sites for which an average value for each leaf characteristic was calculated based on the sampling of six plants (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.02).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Relationship between forest area and leaf ‘toughness’ in Protium hebetatum (a), and between forest area and the amount of condensed tannins in leaves of Henriettella caudata (b). Points represent mean values per site. Leaf ‘toughness’ = 59.1 + 3.32Log(Area) (r2 = 0.544, P = 0.015) and concentration of tannins = 0.118 + 0.041Log(Area) (r2 = 0.615, P = 0.012).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Relationship between forest area and levels of predation upon artificial caterpillars. Values represent the percentage of artificial caterpillars (n = 200 caterpillars randomly distributed in each site) showing marks of attack by ants, wasps, or birds after 24 h.